the status of school leadership in arkansas n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Status of School Leadership in Arkansas PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Status of School Leadership in Arkansas

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 31

The Status of School Leadership in Arkansas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 112 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Status of School Leadership in Arkansas. 2008 University of Arkansas and RAN. Study Intent. Original Intent: Was there a shortage of school leaders (specifically principal’s) in Arkansas? Study Expanded: If there is a shortage. What is the cause? . What Did We Do?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Status of School Leadership in Arkansas' - oshin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the status of school leadership in arkansas

The Status of School Leadership in Arkansas

2008

University of Arkansas and RAN

study intent
Study Intent
  • Original Intent: Was there a shortage of school leaders (specifically principal’s) in Arkansas?
  • Study Expanded: If there is a shortage. What is the cause?
what did we do
What Did We Do?
  • Reviewed the Literature.
  • Determined our questions. Identified our subjects.
  • Surveyed and then analyzed.
  • Drew conclusions.
methodology
Methodology
  • Developed Survey Instruments:
    • Love Dissertation (2000)
    • ERS Study (1998)
      • 11 factors
    • Zeitoun & Newton (2002)
      • Alternative Organizations
who was surveyed
Who Was Surveyed
  • Superintendents
    • 197 respondents with 80% return rate.
  • Teachers
    • Leaders, not interested in Administration!
    • 397 responded from 139 different school districts. Good representation from throughout the state.
is there a shortage
Is There a Shortage?
  • Yes and No!
  • A lot depends on how you look at it.
  • If you have one great applicant for the job, is there a shortage?
change over time 15 years
Change over Time. 15 Years.
  • Experienced Superintendents. What is the difference today and 15 years ago for Principal Applicants?
  • 15 Years ago = 14.8 applicants.
  • Today = 8.7 applicants.
    • Highest in NW = 12.6
    • Lowest in NE = 4.9
    • Highest in Dist. +5,000 = 11.1
    • Lowest in Dist. 0-499 = 6.2
mean number of applicants and applicants who met interview criteria
Mean Number of Applicants and Applicants Who Met Interview Criteria
  • Overall:
    • Mean # of Applicants = 9.5
      • Lowest in 0-499 = 7.9 SE = 5.4
      • Highest in 5000+ = 14.0 Central = 11.3
    • Mean # of Applicants – Interview = 4.7
      • Lowest in 1000-1999 = 4.2 SE = 3.2
      • Highest in 5000+ = 7.0 Central = 5.7
are you satisfied with people you hired
Are You Satisfied with People You Hired?
  • Met Most or Met All Expectations:
    • Size
      • Highest 0-499 = 100%
      • Lowest 5,000+ = 73.5 %
    • Geographical Area
      • Highest NW = 93.9%
      • Lowest SE = 71.4% (No responses in “Met All Expectations)
number of principal vacancies in the last three years
Number of Principal Vacancies in the Last Three Years
  • Elementary = 196
  • Middle School = 174
  • High School = 194
  • (Note: this doesn’t represent all vacancies, only the 80% of respondents. ADE Reports 600 elementary schools, 201 middle schools and 311 high schools.)
superintendents perception of shortage of qualified candidates
Superintendents Perception of Shortage of Qualified Candidates
  • No Shortage & Some Shortage:
    • Overall = 49.2%
    • Lowest Shortage in NW = 54.6%
    • Lowest Shortage 0-499 = 76.5%
  • Significant Shortage & Extreme Shortage:
    • Overall = 20.6 %
    • Highest Shortage in Central = 22.8%
    • Highest Shortage in 5000+ = 28.6%
teachers reason against admin
Teachers – Reason Against Admin.
  • Testing/Accountability Pressures 3.72
  • Job Too Stressful 3.70
  • Too Much Time Required 3.48
  • Societal Problems/ Can Educate 3.18
  • Demands of Parents and Comm. 3.12
  • Salary Not Sufficient 2.62
  • Schools Aren’t Funded Well 2.53
  • Job Not as Satisfying as In Past 2.38
  • Bad Press and PR 2.34
  • Job Security 2.03
  • Openings Not Publicized 1.67
sample comments representative of the group
Sample Comments – Representative of the Group
  • “Administration is very demanding and a high stress job situation. Administrators spend too much time dealing with complaints and not enough time on education.”
  • “I feel being a principal is a highly stressful job. Our principals work overtime, all the time, and usually it is a thankless job. I feel many teachers, like myself, feel the stress and effort are too much.”
  • “Today the principal has to be four to five people rolled into one. The job has changed a lot. Students and parents have changed. The job is very difficult and the pay is not equal to the job.”
more comments
More Comments
  • “The main reason I haven’t chosen to go into administration and the reason I feel others don’t chose to move is because of time. Being a teacher alone consumes so much time that I don’t feel adding to those responsibilities would be a very wise decision.”
  • Etcetera!
superintendents reasons against
Superintendents Reasons Against
  • Testing/Accountability Pressures 3.72 4.35
  • Job Too Stressful 3.70 4.36
  • Too Much Time Required 3.48 4.45
  • Societal Problems/ Can Educate 3.18 4.18
  • Demands of Parents and Comm. 3.12 4.12
  • Salary Not Sufficient 2.62 3.99
  • Schools Aren’t Funded Well 2.53 3.47
  • Job Not as Satisfying as In Past 2.38 3.77
  • Bad Press and PR 2.34 3.51
  • Job Security 2.03 3.15
  • Openings Not Publicized 1.67 2.15
superintendents solutions
Superintendents Solutions
  • Raise Compensation 4.20
  • Improve Training at IHE’s 3.83
  • Redefine the Principalship 3.64
  • Aspiring Principal Workshops 3.43
  • IHE’s Improve Recruiting 3.36
redefining the role
Redefining the Role
  • No Interest = 1……….. High Interest = 5
  • Co-Principal Model 3.35
  • Prin./Bus. Manager 2.94
  • Prin./Ed. Specialist 2.80
  • Prin./Assoc. Principal 2.79
  • Multi-Principal 2.72
  • Prin. Teacher/Admin. Model 2.67
co principal
Co-Principal
  • "Sharing the duties would help to ease the everyday stresses.“
  • "I am very attracted to the idea of an instructional based administrator or one who is primarily in charge of the faculty and their instructional needs while a co-principal might manage behavioral/budgeting needs.“
principal business manager model
Principal/Business Manager Model
  • "Typically the principal has to maintain the dual role of manager and curriculum - instructional leader. This model appeals to me because it divides these responsibilities.“
  • "I thought the principal/business manager model was attractive because as ACSIP Chair I see this as a way to divide responsibilities that would work well in my current school.“
principal educational specialist model
Principal/Educational Specialist Model
  • "I like the idea of having a principal in charge of instruction and one in charge of management and scheduling issues. I think principals are weighted down with so many tasks that there is little time left over to be a leader to teachers and instruction.“
  • "This would allow me to avoid many of the more unattractive duties of the principal. I don't want all the headaches.“
  • "This allows the principal to focus on instructional issues rather than building management.
principal associate principal model
Principal/Associate Principal Model
  • “This model is effective because you have one focused on all phases of instruction and the other responsible for management.“
  • "I believe this model allows for more direct communication between students and administration and allows principals to focus on areas instead of dealing with everything.“
multi principal model
Multi-Principal Model
  • "You could work as a team and all responsibility wouldn't be placed on one persons shoulders. It would allow for grade specific principals for more focus on student achievement.“
  • "Dividing responsibilities eases pressure on each principal.“
  • "I believe this model is most attractive. There could be real value in the "looping" of grade level principals. I would even adda counselor to that model that would loop all four years.
principal teacher administrator model
Principal Teacher/Administrator Model
  • "Most principals are going to be better suited for one particular area and this item really lets a principal job candidate move toward the area he/she is most comfortable in."
  • "I like this because it places the principal in a position of being the instructional leader.“
follow up question
Follow-up Question
  • 15 Respondents were called and given a follow-up question.
  • “All the Alternative Models are possible under the current staffing at most schools, why not just use the existing staff to re-organize?”
here s a sample of what was said
Here’s a Sample of What Was Said
  • “Just making the assistant principal a co-principal won’t change anything. They are both overloaded as it is. They need more help. You just can’t change job titles.”
  • “Since we don’t have a business manager, I thought we’d add that position to support the principal and vice principal.”
  • If there wasn’t additional help I wouldn’t be interested in the job, no matter how you organized it.”
other interesting stuff
Other Interesting “Stuff”
  • Job Less Satisfying as It Was in Past
    • 0-5 years exp. = 1.99
    • 16-20 years Exp. = 2.92
  • Too Much Time Required
    • 0-5 years exp. = 2.99
    • 6-10 years exp. = 3.41
    • 11-15 years exp = 3.67
    • 16-20 years exp. 3.73
    • 26+ years exp. = 3.65
interesting stuff cont
Interesting Stuff (Cont.)
  • No significant difference between “Regular Teachers” and “Teachers with Leadership Responsibilities” on any measure.
  • Gender showed a difference only on “Job Generally Too Stressful” (.001 level)
    • Males 3.13 Females 3.88
    • Females, generally scored every reason for not becoming an admin. Higher than males.
conclusions
Conclusions
  • Rate the Admin. Shortage as Moderate.
    • Candidate pool is shrinking.
  • Massive Turnover of Principalships in Arkansas. Musical Chairs?
  • Pressure, Stress and Time are the reasons teachers don’t want to be principals.
  • Teachers are interested in being principals, but not the current job.
study available at http cied uark edu principalstudy2008 pd f
Study Available at: http://cied.uark.edu/PrincipalStudy2008.pdf