1 / 47

National Trauma Data Standard: Everything you’ve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask!

National Trauma Data Standard: Everything you’ve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask!. N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS. Objectives. Need for a National Registry The State of State Registries Variability in Data Quality Development of the NTDS Implementation of NTDS.

oshin
Download Presentation

National Trauma Data Standard: Everything you’ve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Trauma Data Standard: Everything you’ve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask! N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS

  2. Objectives • Need for a National Registry • The State of State Registries • Variability in Data Quality • Development of the NTDS • Implementation of NTDS

  3. Need for a National Registry • Provide a national resource for clinical benchmarking, process improvement, and patient safety • Characterize all patient care • Provide baseline measures for enhancing disaster preparedness • Develop better injury scoring and outcome measures • This is not necessarily surveillance

  4. States with Statewide Registries Planning – CA, DC, ID, KY, LA, ME, MA, MI, NE, NM, TN, WV, WI Technical Difficulties – ND, SD No Plans – HI, IN, NH, NJ, RI, VT

  5. States with Registries • 27/32 require hospitals to report • 11 states…all acute care hospitals • 15 states…only designated centers • 1 state…only participating hospitals • 5/32 request hospitals report • 2 states…all acute care hospitals • 1 state…only designated centers • 2 states…partial registries

  6. Variation in Case Acquisition

  7. Threats to Data Integrity • Mandatory/elective Submission • Completeness of Case Capture • Difference in Case Definition • Difference in Coding Conventions

  8. Are Registries Comparable?

  9. Variability in Case Definition Inclusion CriteriaNumberExclusion CriteriaNumber Abuse 4 Abuse 3 Blisters, contusions, Blisters, contusions, abrasions 3 abrasions 11 Drowning 13 Drowning 15 Smoke inhalation 7 Smoke inhalation 2 Foreign bodies 5 Foreign bodies 17 High altitude sickness 0 High altitude sickness 1 Lightning 5 Lightning 0 Same level fall 2 Same level fall 18 Poisoning 2 Poisoning 13

  10. Variability in Case Definition • Variability in “same-level fall” exclusion • Same level fall AND age > 55 yrs old • Same level fall AND age > 65 yrs old • Same level fall AND isolated hip fracture (ICD-9 820) • Same level fall AND fracture of the vertebral column (ICD-9 805) • Same Level fall AND isolated fracture of the pelvis (ICD-9 808.2) • Same level fall AND superficial injury (ICD-9 910-924) • Same level fall AND age > 65 yrs old AND isolated hip fracture (ICD-9 820) • Same level fall AND age > 65 yrs old AND isolated extremity fracture (no ICD-9 codes listed)

  11. Variability in Coding Conventions Glasgow Coma Score in ED • 15 states………..……initial GCS • 8 states……..initial and last GCS • 1 state………………...worst GCS • 1 state………………… best GCS • 1 state……..initial and worst GCS

  12. Variability in Coding Conventions Time of Injury Coding ConventionNumber of States Report “Not documented” 10 Report EMS dispatch time 8 Report 5 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time 2 Report 15 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time 1 Report 5 to 20 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time depending on call location and general scene info 1 Report EMS dispatch time only if MVC§ 1 Report EMS arrival time 1 Report in categories (< 1 hour, 1-6 hours, 7-12 hours, 13-24 hours, or >24 hours) 1

  13. Data Needs for Registries • All States with Trauma Registries • Complete Data Capture • Common Subset of Variables • Uniform Data Definitions and Values • Standardized Coding Conventions • Common Definition of Injury • Uniform Inclusion Criteria

  14. Existing National Registry • Annual Report • NTDB Pediatric Report • NTDB Slide Kits • Hospital Benchmark Reports • Trauma Center Data Report Cards • ACS Bulletin Articles

  15. 2007 • NTDB contains over 2.7 million records • From 900 US trauma centers • Annual Report Version 7.0 released

  16. National Trauma Data Standard 2.2

  17. The “Bank” The “Currency”

  18. Standard Inclusion Criteria Standard Data Definitions Standard Source Hierarchy Standard Comorbidities Pediatric specific additions Auto-Calculated Fields Edit Checks The “ Validator” National Trauma Data Standard

  19. Ensuring Common Variables • Common Subset of Variables • Evaluate variable frequency across registries • Consider importance at national level • Seek consensus from experts

  20. Variable Schema Primary Variable Supportive Variable Autogenerated Variable Secondary Variable

  21. Auto-generated Variables • FIPS - like code (location code) • Trauma Type (blunt, penetrating, burn) • Injury Intentionality (using CDC matrix) • Total EMS Response Time • Total EMS Scene Time • Total EMS Time • Revised Trauma Score in the Prehospital Setting (adult and pediatric) • Revised Trauma Score in ED (adult and pediatric) • Abbreviated Injury Scale (six body regions) • Injury Severity Score • International Classification Injury Severity Score • Functional Capacity Index • Total ED Time • Total Length of Hospital Stay

  22. Choosing Inclusion Criteria Uniform Inclusion Criteria • Collect all state inclusion/exclusion criteria • Assess criteria for commonalities • Look for least common denominator? States Criterion

  23. NTDS Inclusion Criteria

  24. Improving Data Quality

  25. NTDS Edit Checks

  26. Development of the Validator

  27. National Trauma Data Standard THE “VALIDATOR” “Hasta La Vista Bad Data”

  28. “Validator” External Server NTDS Outcomes “Validator” Benefit of a Common XML NTDB NEMSIS

  29. Improving Data Usability

  30. On Line Data Submission

  31. Facility Demographics • Expanded Facility information screens • Hospital type • Hospital teaching status • Verification level • Bed Inventory • Inclusion criteria • Transfers in or out • Age of pediatric patients • Comorbidities and complications • Number of registrars • Number of surgeons • Software product utilized

  32. Verification Requirement Annual NTDB participation Officially in effect with new green book Centers received waivers in 2007 as needed Year round data submission started in 2008

  33. Data Submission

  34. Call for Data 2008 First NTDB call for data based on NTDS version 1.2 Map current registry fields to the new standard 2009 Second NTDB call for data based on NTDS version 1.2 Updated software from vendors that incorporates all the new data fields and allows for direct data entry.

  35. We need your support! • National Trauma Data Standard will: • Allow for seamless participation in NTDB • Describe severe trauma nationally • Characterize treatment and outcome • Assess trauma systems attributes • Link to standardized EMS data • Vendors are also interested in your commitment!

  36. Tasks Seem Overwhelming?

  37. Technical Assistance • Visit the website • Join the NTDS Google Group • Talk with your software vendors • Utilize resources at the ACS and NEMSIS TAC

  38. www.ntdsdictionary.org/

  39. Join the NTDS Google Group!

  40. www.ntdb.org

  41. For More Information… • www.ntdb.org • www.ntdsdictionary.org • www.ntdbdatacenter.com

  42. Additional Questions • Contact • N. Clay Mann clay.mann@hsc.utah.edu (801) 585-9161 • Melanie Neal MNeal@facs.org (312) 202-5536

  43. How do we get here from there?

  44. Questions

More Related