Effective court practice for abused elders
Download
1 / 28

Effective Court Practice for Abused Elders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 211 Views
  • Uploaded on

Effective Court Practice for Abused Elders. Deana Piazza, Senior Research Analyst Center for Families, Children & the Courts Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) Conference, Long Beach October 17, 2008. Study Overview.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Effective Court Practice for Abused Elders' - oshin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Effective court practice for abused elders l.jpg

Effective Court Practice for Abused Elders

Deana Piazza, Senior Research Analyst

Center for Families, Children & the Courts

Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) Conference, Long Beach

October 17, 2008


Study overview l.jpg
Study Overview

  • Two-year research project funded by Archstone Foundation

  • Profiles of four study courts

  • Statewide survey on court response to elder abuse

  • Court curriculum



Judicial involvement in elder abuse matters l.jpg

Criminal Cases

Civil Fraud and Conversion

Domestic Violence

Personal Injury

Unlawful Detainer

Lawsuits Against Facilities

Adult Adoptions

Probate

Mental Health Commitment

APS Initiated Proceedings

Domestic Relations

Cases Regarding Health Care Decisions For Incapacitated Person

Civil Harassment

Conservatorship

Judicial Involvement in Elder Abuse Matters


Limited administrative data on elder abuse in courts l.jpg
Limited Administrative Data on Elder Abuse in Courts

  • Elder abuse restraining order petitions increased 59% between 2001-02 and 2005-06

  • Conservatorships under court’s control increased 15% between 2002 and 2006


File review characteristics of elderly litigants l.jpg
File Review: Characteristics of Elderly Litigants

  • Mostly female (2/3 to 3/4)

  • More than half 80+ years old

  • Most likely to be living in own home

    • More likely to be living with others than living alone

  • More than 3/4 of cases had outside agency involvement

  • Physical disabilities, memory loss, cognitive impairment


File review description of abuse l.jpg
File Review: Description of Abuse

  • Types of abuse:

    • Many cases involved more than one type of abuse

    • Financial abuse most common in conservatorships; Emotional abuse most common in restraining orders

  • Alleged abusers:

    • Mostly family members (esp. adult children)

    • More likely to be male



Specialty courts calendars l.jpg
Specialty Courts & Calendars

  • Consolidation: Elder abuse comes to court in multiple case types

  • Coordination with service providers: Victims & abusers often have health & social problems related to abuse

  • Judicial monitoring: Many abusers are family members & victims want to maintain contact


Specialty courts calendars10 l.jpg
Specialty Courts & Calendars

  • 16% of courts had specialized/consolidated calendars exclusively for EA

    • Primarily for restraining order cases


Alameda county elder protection court l.jpg
Alameda County Elder Protection Court

  • Collaboration with system partners (APS, DA, victim/witness, Legal Assistance for Seniors); Elder Access Committee

  • Case manager

    • Service referrals; assistance with court documents; background checks


Alameda county elder protection court12 l.jpg
Alameda County Elder Protection Court

  • Identification and tracking of cases across departments

  • Late morning calendar to accommodate fluctuations in capacity

  • Direct calendaring


Florida elder justice centers l.jpg
Florida Elder Justice Centers

  • Dedicated court facility with co-location of agencies serving elders

    • Coordination of service referrals

  • Availability of enhanced communication devices and large-font pleadings

  • Public education and outreach


Other calendaring practices l.jpg
Other Calendaring Practices

  • Ventura County

    • Pro per conservatorship calendar; volunteer attorneys available to provide courtroom assistance

    • Elder abuse cases filed under PC 368 heard in Family Violence Court

  • San Francisco County: EAROs heard on DV calendar, elder cases called first

  • Orange County: One judicial officer hears all EAROs, elder cases called first


Crafting orders sentencing l.jpg
Crafting Orders & Sentencing

  • Protect abused person & other individuals

  • Protect assets

  • Maintain independence

  • Maintain relationship between victim & abuser

  • Link parties to appropriate services

  • Make victim whole (restitution, return of property)

  • Monitor compliance


Services accommodations l.jpg
Services & Accommodations

  • Physical accommodations (e.g., assistive listening devices)

  • Flexible scheduling to accommodate fluctuations in capacity

  • Expedite elder abuse cases on calendar

  • Hearings in alternate settings; closing courtroom to public

  • Testimony & cross-examination via videotape/CCTV

  • May also encompass self-help services


Services accommodations20 l.jpg
Services & Accommodations

  • Alameda County EPC: Mid-morning calendar, telephonic appearances

  • Ventura County

    • Probate judge steps down from bench, shakes hands, uses plain language

    • Planning to expand self-help to elder law (L.A. also has elder law clinic)

  • Stetson University College of Law’s Eleazer Courtroom


Community partnerships l.jpg
Community Partnerships

  • Multidisciplinary teams: Better case coordination, investigation, evidence collection

    • Direct court participation or court support

  • Task forces and coordinating councils


Community partnerships22 l.jpg
Community Partnerships

  • Half of courts not involved in any partnerships related to elder abuse

  • One in five involved in community education and outreach or participate on MDTs

  • Common referrals: Public guardian, legal services, DV shelters or programs

    • Courts more likely to make than receive referrals


Community partnerships23 l.jpg
Community Partnerships

  • Alameda County EPC highly dependent on network of agencies & service providers

    • Elder Access Committee examines systemic issues

  • Ventura County

    • Court spearheaded development of Elder Law Coordinating Council

    • Court staff participate on Financial Abuse Specialist Team


Volunteer pro bono programs l.jpg
Volunteer & Pro Bono Programs

  • Scarce resources combined with need for specialized knowledge

  • Orange County Model Program for Unbefriended Elderly

  • Ventura County volunteer auditor program

  • San Francisco County: Conservatorship classes for non-professionals taught by PFAC volunteers

  • Recommendation for court ombudsman program


Training l.jpg
Training

  • Identification/recognition of elder abuse cases

  • Ways to effectively respond to elder abuse cases

  • Beneficial to court staff as well as judicial officers


Common training needs l.jpg

Judges

State laws concerning EA (46%)

Capacity issues (30%)

Community resources (29%)

Crafting orders (29%)

Court Staff

Communicating w/ individuals w/ capacity issues (57%)

Types of cases involving EA (55%)

Case management & procedural innovations (43%)

Common Training Needs


Other key training topics l.jpg
Other Key Training Topics

  • Dynamics of elder abuse and family violence

  • Physiological and social aspects of aging

  • Undue influence

  • Adult Protective Services


For more information l.jpg
For More Information

www.courtinfo.ca.gov/programs/cfcc

[email protected]

415-865-8997


ad