1 / 20

Midterm evaluation of teaching

Midterm evaluation of teaching. Get out a piece of paper Keep it anonymous What should Ron: Start doing -- new things that might work Stop doing -- things that aren’t working Continue doing -- things that are working. Outline. Midterm Essay Question Balance of Power theory

osgood
Download Presentation

Midterm evaluation of teaching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Midterm evaluationof teaching • Get out a piece of paper • Keep it anonymous • What should Ron: • Start doing -- new things that might work • Stop doing -- things that aren’t working • Continue doing -- things that are working

  2. Outline • Midterm Essay Question • Balance of Power theory • World War I: history and explanation • World War II: history and explanation • War and its causes • Nuclear weapons

  3. Balance of Power theory • Three definitions of “balance of power” • Description of distribution of existing power between states • Conscious policy and set of principles intended by states to achieve a balance of power • Unintended consequence of international system structure • “Secondary states … flock to the weaker side” (Waltz) • States sometime bandwagon rather than balance

  4. Characteristics of polarity and balancing • Number of poles: • unipolar (hegemony) • bipolar • multipolar • Degree of polarization: • tightness • discreteness of poles • level of animosity • Relationship to war • imbalances cause war, equilibrium causes peace

  5. World War I and its causes • Deep causes: • Increasing power of Germany • Less flexible alliance structure. • Intermediate causes • Concerns about encirclement and expansionist policies • Serb nationalism threatening to Austro-Hungary • Domestic German politics => adventurism and expansionism • Complacency about need to balance (as conscious policy) • Proximate causes • Poor leadership and diplomacy of Austro-Hungary, Russia, and Germany • Assassination came at bad time

  6. GavriloPrincip killing Archduke Francis Ferdinand 6/28/1914 Illustration from Italian newspaper.http://www.npr.org/2014/03/06/285893848/how-bad-directions-and-a-sandwich-started-world-war-i

  7. Rising Nationalism Rising popular participation Collapse of Austria-Hungary Domestic class conflict Aggressive German Policy Rise in German power Bipolarity of Alliances Loss of moderation in system process Escalating Crisis War in 1914 Source: Nye 2011, p. 93

  8. World War II and its causes • Systemic level causes • Effects of First World War • WWI treaties too harsh and too lenient • State level causes • Poorly planned policies • Stalin pact with Hitler ignores downside risks • Strong nationalism in Germany and Japan • Economic collapse of Great Depression • US isolationism • Individual level causes • Hitler’s aggressive, expansionist, nationalist ideology • Appeasement and misperceptions by Chamberlain, et al. • Poor theory of Wilson and League of Nations • Japanese miscalculation of power vis-à-vis US

  9. Causes of war (Farnsworth, 1992) • Human nature • Balance of power theory – imbalances cause war • Efforts by states to build up own forces because they feel threatened • Number of states in system • Demands of domestic system • Nationalism • Bad leadership and policy choices

  10. Strategic Nuclear Weapons: 1997 vs. 2014 1997: http://www.cdi.org/issues/nukef&f/database/nukestab.html and 2014: http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat

  11. Tactical Nuclear Weapons: 1997 vs. 2014 1997: http://www.cdi.org/issues/nukef&f/database/nukestab.html and 2014: http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat

  12. Effects of nuclear weapons • Decreased likelihood of total war • Increased devastation should war occur • Increased likelihood of regional wars

  13. Pre-Nuclear World

  14. Nuclear World

  15. Explaining Cold War Peace

  16. A nuclear taboo? • Logic of consequences: decisions as cost-benefit calculation from available means • Logic of appropriateness: decisions as "what is right in current situation, given social identity state desires" • Tannenwald: • Bush 1: nuclear weapon use not considered because not “right” thing for Americans to do • There WERE previous nuclear threats

  17. Nuclear vs. chemical and biological weapons • How do they differ? • Ease of acquisition: availability of components and know-how, known likelihood of success • Ease of use • Magnitude and type of impacts • Why do we consider some worse than others?

More Related