1 / 28

Biofuels Sustainability Qs: towards solutions Njeri Wamukonya

Biofuels Sustainability Qs: towards solutions Njeri Wamukonya. Presented at the High-level Biofuels Seminar in Africa, Addis Ababa, 30July-1 August 2007 . A fast growing market…. Worldwide investment in bioenergy in 2005 were US$2.66 billion, in 2006 it was US$ 21 billion.

osbourne
Download Presentation

Biofuels Sustainability Qs: towards solutions Njeri Wamukonya

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Biofuels Sustainability Qs: towards solutionsNjeri Wamukonya Presented at the High-level Biofuels Seminar in Africa, Addis Ababa, 30July-1 August 2007

  2. A fast growing market… Worldwide investment in bioenergy in 2005 were US$2.66 billion, in 2006 it was US$ 21 billion. Governments in developed and developing countries are putting into place bioenergy targets. Main drivers for bioenergy uptake are energy security, climate change and development concerns.

  3. … with huge potential But risks

  4. Food security 4 cumulative dimensions: Availability, Access, Stability, Utilization

  5. Water scarcity

  6. Issues/realities • The biofuel industry will prevail due to the forces/incentives and drivers in place • Drivers are multifaceted (CC underlying- but it is MITIGATION –(who has the mitigative obligations?))– and that’s all its about from a CC perspective • What are the risks posed by this driver: is there danger of solving one env problem while creating other env problems

  7. Issues/realities • Stakeholders interests can be conflicting (large companies vs women subsistence farmers) • What experiences can and should be transferred? • What pitfalls should be avoided based on past cash-crop experiences? • How can potential threats be circumvented?

  8. Challenges (two-fold) • 1: it is important that environmental and social criteria for production of the biomass are met • 2: this criteria should be flexible to achieve maximum yield for biofuels production (but not compromising)

  9. Challenges • Hence UNEP and partners are setting up a process for establishing stds for biofuels (starting with vehicles) ; policy guidelines also needed ; enforcement mechanisms/self regulatory • Agreement on a criteria or principles is necessary • Target stakeholders: producer andconsumer • Tool : certification

  10. Certification • assures customers that the product they purchase is produced in a sustainable manner • Certification steps: • Application of Stds - locally relevant but also comply with international stds/good practice • Inspection (audit) –assessment to ensure stds are met • Evaluation and results of audit –tracing product to source • Issuance of the certificate if compliance is met - after receiving accreditation then products can be labeled with ‘seal of approval’

  11. Team activities towards stds goal • Gather info on existing certification systems that could be adapted `for establishing sustainable biomass production system • 12 different labels were screened in Forestry, Agric, bioenergy for heat and electricity production and trade sector – examining indicators that cover social, economic, ecological and general criteria

  12. General findings • Agric: - no certification system for biomass production specifically for bioenergy • Existing systems emphasis on: • Organic farming – prohibits use of agrochemicals eg mineral nitrogen fertilisers and pesticides • Integrated agric – farming in an economically viable way while respecting ecological demands

  13. General findings • Forestry: certification ensures management and proper logging practices are adhered to • Considers social, economic and env benefits for both producer and consumer of products • There are 20 forest certification organizations and stds in operation • 2 major forest certification umbrellas – • Programme for endorsement of forest certification schemes • Forest stewardship council

  14. General findings • Bioenergy for heat and electricity production : deals with criteria for sustainable energy from biomass sources • 2 systems – • European Green Electricity Network (EUGENE) • Green gold certificate • 3rd relevant system focusing on principles and criteria for palm oil production – Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)

  15. General findings • Trade : can benefit the economy But can also create inequities • Eg: 49 LDCs rep---10% of world’s pop--- contribute only 0.4% of global exports • Incoperating trade criteria provides better trading opportunities and ensures producers especially poor and disadvantaged producers benefit from biofuels (not repeat the LDC scenario)

  16. Can certification work? • Common agenda / shared goals • Commitment to goal and partners • Overall : accountability/enforcement mechanisms/commitment and political will • Flexible and lean/simple inst structure • examples

  17. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) • Ensures palm oil production is done in a sustainable manner • Started in 2001 WWF got consultant to explore possibilities • 2003 : WWF organised consultative meeting -200 participants from 16 countries • 2004 RSPO formally established under the Swiss Civil Code • Association seats in Zurich but sec currently based in Kuala Lumpur

  18. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) • Funding • ordinary membership fees at Euro2000/yr • Affiliate membership fees at Euro 250/yr • Structure • Managed by EB comprised of 16 members designated by general assembly for 2 years • Members : oil palm growers, palm oil producers, palm oil processors and traders, consumer goods manufacturers, env ngos, retailers, banks/investors, social/dev ngos • decisions made on consensus basis

  19. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) • STDs and the respective principles • Social Dev: • Responsible consideration for employees, individuals and communities affected by growers or mills • Econ Dev: • Commitment to long term econ and financial viability • Env Dev: • Env responsibility and conservation of natural resources and biodiversity

  20. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) 4. Generic Stds • Env responsibility and conservation of natural resources and biodiversity • Compliance with applicable laws and regulations • Responsible dev of new plantings • Commitment to continuous improvement in key areas of activity Accreditation : independent

  21. Firetrade Labelling Organisation • For such products as coffee and cocoa • Purpose: improve position of poor and disadvantaged producers in the developing world • Labeling initiatives and members encourage industry and consumers to support fairer trade and purchase products

  22. Firetrade Labelling Organisation • Funding: • license fees from Labeling Initiatives • Premiums from consumers • Certification paid by producers and traders • Structure : Board of Directors (11 members for 3 years) . A Director runs the organization • 3 sets of stds: • for small farmers • Laborers on plantations and factories • Traders

  23. Firetrade Labelling Organisation • Label criteria: • Minimum and progress requirements for Stds • Producers business unit –suppo • Certification areas: 560 orgs in 75 countries in africa, asia, and LA (their effectiveness in africa is questionable given 0.4% share of trade among LDCs!!)

  24. Does Africa need such an approach - stds/criteria? • Status and stages of dev in African countries differ • Level and extent of involvement will differ • External stakeholders diversified – approaches individual or community or country • No level playing field between ‘external’ players and local (includes gov) eg external players are financially and information advantaged • Past experiences with cash crops call for caution A policy makers choice!!

  25. Basis for development • Social Dev : not compromise/compete with food, (water, land, labor etc)

  26. Does the country meet food demand locally • What is the share towards food security does local production meet? • Is the country under food security threat?

  27. Guiding approaches ?? • Areas under food production should not shift to biofuels • Areas with high-medium production potential should not be used for biofuels • Marginal land: used only if not under threat to severe unrecoverable degradation • Clear forest land/wetlands for biofuels • What type of national support to provide for biofuels? How does this compete with other food security needs?

  28. Asanteni Sana

More Related