joint exchange interop work group test workgroup n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 99 Views
  • Uploaded on

Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup. Eric Heflin/Judith Huntman /Ed O’Connor. Aug 8, 2012. Agenda. Roll Call – Admin Announcements – Eric (5 mins ) ‘Round-the-Room for Harmonized Specs – Eric (10 mins )

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup' - osanna


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
joint exchange interop work group test workgroup

Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup

Eric Heflin/Judith Huntman/Ed O’Connor

Aug 8, 2012

agenda
Agenda
  • Roll Call – Admin
  • Announcements – Eric (5 mins)
  • ‘Round-the-Room for Harmonized Specs – Eric (10 mins)
  • Phased Approach to Harmonization for Remaining Specs – Judith/Ed (10 mins)
  • ‘Round-the-Room for Phasing Approach – Eric (10 mins)
  • Test Execution and Test Architecture – Ed (10-15 mins)
  • Definition of Done – Ed (5 mins)
  • Test Case Metrics – Ed (7 mins)
  • Open Discussion – All
  • Wrap Up - Eric
  • RFP Schedule Review - Eric
announcements
Announcements
  • Harmonized PRL (PD/QD/RD/MP/AF) Tests Are Drafted
    • No objections were received and are now candidates for “final” status
    • Future changes are possible, but will be incorporated into the next phase of test cases design and implementation
    • We will do a ‘round-the-room next on the status
    • Vote next week to consider the harmonized Phase I test specs final
  • RFP
    • Has 5 respondents
    • Bidder interviews have been conducted top few vendors
    • Analysis is nearing completion
round the room
‘round-the-room

Can we vote next week to consider the harmonized test specifications (presented over the last few weeks) as final?

The scope of this question is the harmonized specifications for Patient Record Lookup (aka Patient Discovery, Query for Documents, and Retrieve Documents + Messaging Platform and Authorization Framework).

harmonization phases
Harmonization Phases

Unified Test Process – Has Been Proposed

phase ii work plan direct test specs
Phase II Work Plan: Direct Test Specs

* More detailed status will be posted on the Wiki

phase iii work plan secondary specs
Phase III Work Plan: Secondary Specs
  • Secondary Methods, Service Discovery, & Provider Directories
round the room1
‘round-the-room

What are your thoughts about the phased approach for harmonization? Do you object to the proposed approach?

test case execution
Test Case Execution
  • Manual: Step-by-step instructions are included in written test packages
  • Draft tracking worksheet for execution methods
  • What tests are the best candidates for tooling?
  • SOAP UI as a component, review different uses of it
  • Other utilities/components to research?
  • What about the conformance checklists?
architecture review
Architecture Review
  • Refresh on Reference Toolkit concept
  • Check-in on feedback to high-level Toolkit architecture
  • Assumptions on prioritization at utility level
    • Message simulation for High test cases in PD/QD/RD
    • Proof of concept of lightweight orchestration (BDD layer)
    • Integration of NIST content tools (c32 then CCDA)
  • Ideas/volunteers for utilities, modules, or approaches?
  • Definition of “done”
  • Metrics for SOAP UI scripts
open discussion
Open Discussion

Other topics?

rfp schedule review
RFP Schedule Review
  • RFP released — July 2nd 
  • Questions received by 6 organizations
  • Answers distributed — July 13th
  • Bids due — July 20th
  • Expected award — August 15th
  • Contract start — TBD

We are here