1 / 43

INTERIOR PLANTS FOR SUSTAINABLE FACILITY ECOLOGY AND WORKPLACE PRODUCTIVITY

INTERIOR PLANTS FOR SUSTAINABLE FACILITY ECOLOGY AND WORKPLACE PRODUCTIVITY. Margaret Burchett Fraser Torpy & Jane Tarran Plants and Indoor Environmental Quality Group Faculty of Science University of Technology, Sydney. Outline. Basics of human ecology Human ecology comes to town

orpah
Download Presentation

INTERIOR PLANTS FOR SUSTAINABLE FACILITY ECOLOGY AND WORKPLACE PRODUCTIVITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INTERIOR PLANTS FOR SUSTAINABLE FACILITY ECOLOGY AND WORKPLACE PRODUCTIVITY Margaret Burchett Fraser Torpy & Jane Tarran Plants and Indoor Environmental Quality Group Faculty of Science University of Technology, Sydney

  2. Outline • Basics of human ecology • Human ecology comes to town • Need for healthy facility ecology • Urban problems: • Air pollution, • Chronic stress, & • Scarcity of green oases • Urban plantings alleviate problems • Values of indoor plants to improve IEQ: • Indoor air quality (IAQ) • Occupant wellbeing and productivity • Urban/indoor plants helping enabling sustainable communities

  3. Human ecology - 0.5 to 2 million years www.virtualtourist.com

  4. ‘Hunter/gatherer’ diet -GATHERING - PLANTS • Fruit, including: -Cereal grains -Soft fruit (including also most ‘vegetables’) -Nuts • Roots • (A few leaves) -HUNTING - ANIMALS • Mammal / bird / fish protein - when hunt was successful • And it hasn’t changed much since

  5. Human settlement - 10 thousand years Planting Fencing herds Housing

  6. Human plant needs For ‘Body’: • Food / Drink • Fodder / Fences • Fuel / Fire • Fibre / Ropes • Fabrics • Remedies (herbals) • Shade / Shelter • Timber (tools, weapons, buildings, boats) • [O2 (lungs of planet) / CO2 & pollution sink]

  7. More Human plant needs For ‘Mind and Spirit’: • Beauty • Perfumes • Pleasure & leisure • Peace and calm • Poetry / mysticallity • Piety / spirituality • Glimpses of Paradise

  8. Ancient city-state economies - 3 to 4 thousand years • Irrigation • Palaces /kings • Temples/ priests • Religious monuments • Leisure Google images

  9. The move to ‘metropolis’ - 200 years (And, air pollution increases!)

  10. Towards enabling sustainable urban communities - Questions: How well adapted are we to our ‘urban ecology’? And/or How can we adapt ‘urban ecology’ to fulfil our fundamental needs?

  11. Pros of urban living Better education Less strenuous manual labour More employment Better public health (sewage & waste disposal) Much lower mortality from infectious diseases More available health services More entertainments Longer life expectancy

  12. Cons of urban living • Dependence on distant food sources • ‘Ecological footprint’ far larger than obvious • More additives/preservatives for food ‘keeping’ • Chronic sedentary diseases • Obesity • Diabetes • Cardiovascular dysfunctions • Mental health problems • Stress • Depression • Violence Air • Air pollution health risks • ‘Nature / Plant / Escape / Restoration’ - deprivation

  13. Continued need of links with ‘nature’ ‘Location, location, location!’ Property values Who get the offices with the window views? Most popular ‘family’ websites: -Gardening -Fishing -Weekend get-away info -(Recipes! Food, glorious food)

  14. Urban air quality- the situation • 80% Australians live in cities • Urban air quality is a health concern • Air pollution kills ~1,400 p.a. in Sydney • Spend ~90% of our time indoors • Indoor air quality is a health concern - and • Indoor air pollution is ~always higher than outdoors

  15. Outdoor urban air pollutants From burning fossil fuels- -Primary emission products -Carbon oxides (CO2) (CO) -Nitrogen oxides (NOx) -Sulfur oxides (SOx) -Metals -Air toxics - ie organics (‘BTEX’, PAHs) -Fine particulates’(PM10 / 2.5) -Secondary (photochemical) -More NOx -Ozone (O3) -Peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) -Smog/haze

  16. Urban air pollution health risks Short-term • Asthma • Strokes • Heart attacks • Sudden infant death syndrome Long-term • Low birth weights • Some cancers • Other cardiovascular problems • Mental illnesses NY / www.pollutionissues.com

  17. Indoor air pollution Outdoor pollution load plus - Sometimes- -More NOx, SOx & CO (with gas appliances) Generally- -Higher CO2 levels Always- -House dust -Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from: -furniture, fabrics, fittings -paints, glues -computers, printers -solvents, detergents -shampoos, cosmetics; etc. (www.morganlovell.co.uk / m3mary.com / dragonflyoffice.co.uk)

  18. Added risks from indoor air pollution Can cause ‘Sick -building syndrome’- VOCs - even at imperceptible levels, can cause- -Short-term -Loss of concentration -Headaches, ‘Woozy-head’ -Dry eyes, nose, throat -Nausea -Long-term -Chronic health problems - as for outdoor sources Elevated CO2 -Stuffiness, drowsiness, loss of concentration

  19. Indoor plants improve IAQ - Reducing levels of- -NOx -SOx - Air toxics and VOCs -Dust Stabilising -Humidity -Temperature -Noise Hence helping improve -Staff wellbeing -Productivity (reduction in sick leave)

  20. Our laboratory studies on VOC removal

  21. Test design • Eleven plant species • Four VOCs -Benzene, toluene, xylene, n-hexane • Test conditions - Continuous light - Initial dose - Daily top-up doses - VOC disappearance rates measured - Continuous dark - rate effects? - Doubled dose - rate effects? - Plant removed, potting-mix tested

  22. Test-chamber findings • Rate of VOC removal accelerates after initial dose • After 4-5 d >10 times initial rates • Once ‘induced’, top-up doses removed in ~24 h • Works as well in light or dark (24/7) • With low or high doses • Potting-mix bacteria main removal agents • Plant roots nourish pot-mix microorganisms • So - removal depends on ‘plant-potting-mix microcosm’ • All species tested work equally well

  23. Xylene removal with Dracaena ‘Janet Craig’ -Effects of increasing dosages

  24. OK -But -what about the real-world? Our office field-study Design • 3 UTS buildings (2 with & 1 without air-conditioning) • Dracaena ‘Janet Craig’ & Spathiphyllum ‘Sweet Chico’ • 3 planting regimes (+ ‘reference’ offices - 0 plants) • Two 5-9 week sampling periods • Total 60 offices (12 per treatment)

  25. Office study - weekly samplings • Measured- -Total VOCs (TVOCs) -Temperature -Humidity -Carbon dioxide (CO2) -Carbon monoxide (CO) • Passive monitors identifed- -Individual VOCs

  26. Floor specimens ofD. ‘Janet Craig’ (0, 3 or 6 pots)

  27. Office VOC findings - summary • No-plants - TVOC loads ~80-400 ppb • When TVOCs rose >100 ppb- any planting reduced levels to <100 ppb • Worked as well + air conditioning • 3 plants as effective as 6; so:- • Minimum needed is less than we used • No jungle needed to reduce TVOCs

  28. CO2 and CO removal - mechanisms Green plants make their own food out of CO2 6CO2 + 6H2O **light energy** → (C6H12O6) + 6O2 & chlorophyll Sugar Plants & potting-mix microorganisms: -Also absorb and use CO

  29. Office study - CO2 &CO removal Effects of 3 Dracaena ‘Janet Craig’, + air-conditioning. (Outdoor CO2 ~ 370 ppm)

  30. Urban plants for wellbeing and productivity Plant physio-psychological benefits In urban green-spaces (oases) Views from the window Bringing the plants inside

  31. Value of urban green-spaces aviewoncities.com

  32. How nearby plants ‘work’ for wellbeing Research by Kaplan & Kaplan (1993) found that: • Plants relieve ‘attention fatigue’, and thus- • Provide a ‘restorative environment’- • By providing 4 qualities: • Attracting ‘effortless attention’ ( or ‘fascination’) • Feelings of temporary ‘awayness’ or ‘escape’ • ‘Extendingscope’ of consciousness • ‘Flowing with one’s inclinations’ (of rest, calm) www.amazon.co.uk

  33. Plant views help occupants’ wellbeing fotosearch.com

  34. Healing benefits of plant views Moore (1981) -Prisoners: • Showed less disruptiveness • Requested less medication Ulrich (1984) - surgical patients: • Left hospital ~2 days earlier • Fewer painkillers • Savings - $ millions

  35. Benefits of indoor plants www.superplants.co.uk

  36. Health benefits of indoor plants Various studies show: • Coughing & fatigue down 37% • Ear, nose and throat symptoms down 23% • Sick-leave down from 15.9 to 5.6% ( >60% reduction) • Children’s sick-leave down in primary classroom • Perception of pain reduced • Blood pressure reduced • Anxiety, depression, hostility reduced • Perceptions of calm and pleasure increased All these effects mean: • Better health for occupants • Significantly improved productivity

  37. Performance benefits of indoor plants Studies show better performance on tests: • Computer manipulations • Card-sorting tasks • Creative thinking on test words • Only a few moments ‘rest’ on plant remedied ‘attention fatigue’ These effects mean: -Enhanced job performance -Less fatigue -Better job satisfaction -Improved productivity

  38. Effects of indoor plants on‘Business Image’ Study with170 respondents- All agreed indoor plants give perception that business is: • Warm and welcoming • Stable and balanced • Well-run • Comfortable to work with • Patient and caring • Concerned for staff welfare • Prepared to spend money on added beauty • Not mean • Providing a healthier, cleaner atmosphere These effects mean smoother business, better sales

  39. Cost-benefit analysis of indoor plants Approximate Costs $ p.a Scenario 1 • 1 floor plant 200 • 1 new staff member 50,000 • If plant gives -> 12% • inc. in productivity 6,000 • Staff member now worth 56,000 • (Or, provide 30 more plants) Scenario 2 • Plant brings retention of- • 1 staff member - so • Save cost of hiring/training new one - > 5,000 • (Or, provide 20 more plants)

  40. Conclusions • Healthy ‘facility ecology’ must- • Enable and encourage continued human/plant linkages • Indoor plants represent an: -adaptive, self-regulating -portable, flexible -relatively low-cost -sustainable, beautiful -biofiltration and biorestoration system for healthy facility ecology • Helping satisfy the ‘triple bottom line’ of: -environmental -social, & -economic considerations • Towards the goal of ‘enabling sustainable communities’

  41. Acknowledgements External funding support *National Interior Plantscape Association (NIPA) *Horticulture Australia Ltd (HAL) *Rentokil Tropical Plants *The Container Connection UTS colleagues *Ms G Armstrong, Mr J Brennan *(Former colleagues Drs R Wood, R Orwell)

  42. Species UTS lab-tested to date Aglaonema modestum Dracaena ‘Janet Craig’ Dracaena marginata Howea forsteriana (Kentia palm) Epipremnum aureum (Pothos) Philodendron ‘Congo’ Sansevieria trifasciata (Mother-in-law’s tongue) Schefflera ‘Amate’ (Qld. Umbrella Tree) Spathiphyllum ‘Petite’ (Peace Lily) Spathiphyllum ‘Sensation’ Zamioculcas zamiifilia (Zanzibar)

  43. Whyfly/org Google images

More Related