Loading in 5 sec....

Thursday 29 October 2002 William H. Hsu Department of Computing and Information Sciences, KSUPowerPoint Presentation

Thursday 29 October 2002 William H. Hsu Department of Computing and Information Sciences, KSU

- By
**orli** - Follow User

- 92 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Thursday 29 October 2002 William H. Hsu Department of Computing and Information Sciences, KSU' - orli

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Introduction to Reinforcement Learning:

Q Learning

Thursday 29 October 2002

William H. Hsu

Department of Computing and Information Sciences, KSU

http://www.kddresearch.org

http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~bhsu

Readings:

Sections 13.3-13.4, Mitchell

Sections 20.1-20.2, Russell and Norvig

- Readings: Chapter 13, Mitchell; Sections 20.1-20.2, Russell and Norvig
- Today: Sections 13.1-13.4, Mitchell
- Review: “Learning to Predict by the Method of Temporal Differences”, Sutton

- Suggested Exercises: 13.2, Mitchell; 20.5, 20.6, Russell and Norvig
- Control Learning
- Control policies that choose optimal actions
- MDP framework, continued
- Issues
- Delayed reward
- Active learning opportunities
- Partial observability
- Reuse requirement

- Q Learning
- Dynamic programming algorithm
- Deterministic and nondeterministic cases; convergence properties

- Learning to Choose Actions
- Performance element
- Applying policy in uncertain environment (last time)
- Control, optimization objectives: belong to intelligent agent

- Applications: automation (including mobile robotics), information retrieval

- Performance element
- Examples
- Robot learning to dock on battery charger
- Learning to choose actions to optimize factory output
- Learning to play Backgammon

- Problem Characteristics
- Delayed reward: loss signal may be episodic (e.g., win-loss at end of game)
- Opportunity for active exploration: situated learning
- Possible partially observability of states
- Possible need to learn multiple tasks with same sensors, effectors (e.g., actuators)

Example:TD-Gammon

- Learns to Play Backgammon [Tesauro, 1995]
- Predecessor: NeuroGammon [Tesauro and Sejnowski, 1989]
- Learned from examples of labelled moves (very tedious for human expert)
- Result: strong computer player, but not grandmaster-level

- TD-Gammon: first version, 1992 - used reinforcement learning

- Predecessor: NeuroGammon [Tesauro and Sejnowski, 1989]
- Immediate Reward
- +100 if win
- -100 if loss
- 0 for all other states

- Learning in TD-Gammon
- Algorithm: temporal differences [Sutton, 1988] - next time
- Training: playing 200000 - 1.5 million games against itself (several weeks)
- Learning curve: improves until ~1.5 million games
- Result: now approximately equal to best human player (won World Cup of Backgammon in 1992; among top 3 since 1995)

- Interactive Model
- State (may be partially observable), incremental reward presented to agent
- Agent selects actions based upon (current) policy
- Taking action puts agent into new state in environment
- New reward: reinforcement (feedback)
- Agent uses decision cycle to estimate new state, compute outcome distributions, select new actions

- Reinforcement Learning Problem
- Given
- Observation sequence
- Discount factor [0, 1)

- Learn to: choose actions that maximize r(t) + r(t + 1)+ 2r(t + 2)+ …

- Given

State

Reward

Action

Reinforcement Learning:Problem Definition

Agent

Policy

Environment

Quick Review:Markov Decision Processes

- Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)
- Components
- Finite set of states S
- Set of actions A

- At each time, agent
- observes state s(t) S and chooses action a(t) A;
- then receives reward r(t),
- and state changes to s(t + 1)

- Markov property, akaMarkov assumption: s(t + 1) = (t + 1) and r(t) = r(s(t), a(t))
- i.e., r(t) and s(t + 1) depend only on current state and action
- Previous history s(0), s(1), …, s(t - 1): irrelevant
- i.e., s(t + 1) conditionally independent of s(0), s(1), …, s(t - 1) given s(t)
- , r: may be nondeterministic; not necessarily known to agent

- Variants: totally observable (accessible), partially observable (inaccessible)

- Components
- Criterion for a(t): Total Reward – Maximum Expected Utility (MEU)

- Performance Element
- Execute actions in environment, observe results
- Learn action policy : state action that maximizes expected discounted rewardE[r(t) + r(t + 1)+ 2r(t + 2)+ …] from any starting state in S
- [0, 1)
- Discount factor on future rewards
- Expresses preference for rewards sooner rather than later

- Note: Something New!
- Target function is : state action
- However…
- We have no training examples of form <state, action>
- Training examples are of form <<state, action>, reward>

- First Learning Scenario: Deterministic Worlds
- Agent considers adopting policy from policy space
- For each possible policy , can define an evaluation function over states:
where r(t), r(t + 1),r(t + 2), … are generated by following policy starting at state s

- Restated, task is to learn optimal policy *

- Finding Optimal Policy

0

100

90

100

0

0

90

100

0

G

0

G

72

81

G

G

81

0

0

0

0

0

81

90

0

81

90

100

100

81

90

100

0

0

72

81

Value Function

r(state, action)

immediate reward values

Q(state, action) values

V*(state) values

One optimal policy

- Idea
- Might have agent try to learn evaluation function V* (abbreviated V*)
- Could then perform lookahead search to choose best action from any state s, because:

- Problem with Idea
- Works well if agent knows
- : state action state
- r : state action R

- When agent doesn’t know and r, cannot choose actions this way

- Works well if agent knows

What to Learn

- Solution Approach
- Define new function very similar to V*
- If agent learns Q, it can choose optimal action even without knowing !

- Using Learned Q
- Q: evaluation function to be learned by agent
- Apply Q to select action
- Idealized, computed policy (this is your brain without Q-learning):
- Approximated policy (this is your brain with Q-learning):

Q Function

- Developing Recurrence Equation for Q
- Note: Q and V* closely related
- Allows us to write Q recursively as
- Nice! Let denote learner’s current approximation to Q

- Training Rule
- s’: state resulting from applying action a in state s
- (Deterministic) transition function made implicit
- Dynamic programming: iterate over table of possible a’ values

Training Rule to Learn Q

- (Nonterminating) Procedure for Situated Agent
- Procedure Q-Learning-Deterministic (Reinforcement-Stream)
- Reinforcement-Stream: consists of <<state, action>, reward> tuples
- FOR each <s, a> DO
- Initialize table entry

- Observe current state s
- WHILE (true) DO
- Select action a and execute it
- Receive immediate reward r
- Observe new state s’
- Update table entry for as follows
- Move: record transition from s to s’

Q Learning forDeterministic Worlds

- Example: Propagating Credit (Q) for Candidate Action
- glyph: denotes mobile robot
- Initial state: s1(upper left)
- Let discount factor be 0.9
- Q estimate

- Property
- If rewards nonnegative, then increases monotonically between 0 and true Q

90

72

100

100

aright

81

81

G

G

63

63

Updating the Q Estimate

s1

s2

s1

s2

Initial state: s1

Next state: s2

- Claim
- converges to Q
- Scenario: deterministic world where <s, a> are observed (visited) infinitely often

- Proof
- Define full interval: interval during which each <s, a> is visited
- During each full interval, largest error in table is reduced by factor of
- Let be table after n updates and n be the maximum error in ; that is,
- For any table entry , updated error in revised estimate is
- Note: used general fact,

Convergence

- Second Learning Scenario: Nondeterministic World (Nondeterministic MDP)
- What if reward and next state are nondeterministically selected?
- i.e., reward function and transition function are nondeterministic
- Nondeterminism may express many kinds of uncertainty
- Inherent uncertainty in dynamics of world
- Effector exceptions (qualifications), side effects (ramifications)

- Solution Approach
- Redefine V, Q in terms of expected values
- Introduce decay factor; retain some of previous Q value
- Compare: momentum term in ANN learning

Nondeterministic Case

- Q Learning Generalizes to Nondeterministic Worlds
- Alter training rule to
- Decaying weighted average
- visitsn(s, a): total number of times <s, a> has been visited by iteration n, inclusive
- r: observed reward (may also be stochastically determined)

- Can Still Prove Convergence of to Q [Watkins and Dayan, 1992]
- Intuitive Idea
- [0, 1]: discounts estimate by number of visits, prevents oscillation
- Tradeoff
- More gradual revisions to
- Able to deal with stochastic environment: P(s’ | s, a), P(r | s, s’, a)

Nondeterministic Case:Generalizing Q Learning

- Reinforcement Learning (RL)
- RL: learning to choose optimal actions from <state, reward, action> observations
- Scenarios
- Delayed reward: reinforcement is deferred until end of episode
- Active learning: agent can control collection of experience
- Partial observability: may only be able to observe rewards (must infer state)
- Reuse requirement: sensors, effectors may be required for multiple tasks

- Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)
- Markovity (aka Markov property, Markov assumption): CI assumption on states over time
- Maximum expected utility (MEU): maximum expected total reward (under additive decomposition assumption)

- Q Learning
- Action-value functionQ : stateaction value
- Q learning: training rule and dynamic programming algorithm for RL

- Control Learning
- Learning policies from <state, reward, action> observations
- Objective: choose optimal actions given new percepts and incremental rewards
- Issues
- Delayed reward
- Active learning opportunities
- Partial observability
- Reuse of sensors, effectors

- Q Learning
- Action-value function Q : stateaction value (expected utility)
- Training rule
- Dynamic programming algorithm
- Q learning for deterministic worlds
- Convergence to true Q
- Generalizing Q learning to nondeterministic worlds

- Next Week: More Reinforcement Learning (Temporal Differences)

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..