600 likes | 682 Views
Collaborative project between Florida DOE and USF to identify academic and behavioral problems in students. Utilize benchmark and peer data for problem analysis and intervention development. Explore replacement behaviors for effective Response to Intervention. Follow Problem-Solving Process steps to implement Tier I interventions successfully.
E N D
Tier I Data Sources / Problem ID A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida FloridaRtI.usf.edu
Perceptions of Skills Survey Your project ID is: • Last 4 digits of SS# • Last 2 digits of year of birth
Advanced Organizer Day Two— • Problem Identification • Tier 1 Data Sources • Problem Solving Process Step 1: Problem Identification Worksheets/Activities • Wrap-up/Next Steps
Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Of longer duration • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Problem ID Academic Systems Behavioral Systems 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90% Horner & Sugai
Problem ID In order to identify a problem, you’ve got to start with three pieces of data- • Benchmark level of performance • Student level of performance • Peer level of performance
Peers Benchmark Student Problem ID
Peers Benchmark Student Problem ID
Benchmark Peers Student Problem ID
Progress Monitoring & Reporting Network (PMRN) • State database administered by the Florida Center for Reading Research (FCRR) • Capacity to store data for five big ideas of reading • Potential measures • DIBELS • Maze probes • SAT-10 • FCAT • PPVT
PMRN cont. • Data reports available for • Individual students • Intervention groups • Classrooms • Grade Levels • Schools • District
Tier I Question • How effective is the core curriculum for all students?
Tier I Question • How effective is the core curriculum for subgroups of students?
Tier I Question • Which first grade classrooms may require Tier I intervention?
Tier I Question • Which students may require additional intervention?
www.swis.org Tier 1, 2, or 3 problem? A week before Christmas break, a student gets a referral for disrespect at 10:15 in his science class.
www.swis.org Tier 1, 2, or 3 problem? A student is found to have a weapon in the locker room at 2:45 p.m. on June 2nd.
NCLB/AYP • http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/ • Click on • Search School Accountability Reports • Choose - AYP, School, county, all years, all grades • Continue • Choose school • Click Submit • Click Detailed Report
Exercise • Review data for your school • Complete the worksheet • Identify any Tier 1 weaknesses
Problem-Solving and Response to Intervention: Skill Training ModuleProblem Identification
Problem Solving: Levels of Implementation • Can be applied to the student, classroom, building, district, and problem levels • Student- academic and/or behavior problem • Classroom-discipline, returning homework • Grade Level-low academic skill performance • Building- bullying, attendance • District- over-/under-representation • System-problem common to students in building
Results Monitoring Addl. Diagnostic Assessment Instruction All Students at a grade level Individualized Intensive Individual Diagnostic Intensive 1-5% As necessary Small Group Differen- tiated By Skill Supplemental 5-10% Group Diagnostic Behavior Academics Approximately monthly Core Bench- Mark Assessment Annual Testing ODRs Monthly Bx Screening None Continue With Core Instruction Grades Classroom Assessments Yearly Assessments 80-90% How Does it Fit Together? Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 1
Steps in the Problem-Solving Process • PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION • Identify replacement behavior • Data- current level of performance • Data- benchmark level(s) • Data- peer performance • Data- GAP analysis • PROBLEM ANALYSIS • Develop hypotheses( brainstorming) • Develop predictions/assessment • INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT • Develop interventions in those areas for which data are available and hypotheses verified • Proximal/Distal • Implementation support • RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RtI) • Frequently collected data • Type of Response- good, questionable, poor
Steps in the Problem-Solving Process: Problem Identification • PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION • Identify replacement behavior • Data- current level of performance • Data- benchmark level(s) • Data- peer performance • Data- GAP analysis
REPLACEMENT BEHAVIORS • State what you WANT the student to be able to do. • Behavior should reflect competencies to improve adaptation • Behavior should attract reinforcement • Behavior must be measurable, observable or reportable
REPLACEMENT BEHAVIORS • Robert is reading below grade level • Robert needs to improve his reading fluency rate from 42 wcpm to 75 wcpm. • Sally is aggressive to her peers • When provoked, Sally will use appropriate words, walk away or ask for help • Rafael is disrespectful to adults • Rafael will improve compliance to directions • Rafael will respond to teacher questions or statements with positive words (define)
Worksheet on Replacement Behaviors • Complete individually • Cross Check with table-mate • Compare to “answer” sheet
Data Required for Problem Identification • Replacement Behavior • Current Level of Functioning • Benchmark/Desired Level • Peer Performance • GAP Analysis
Example- ORF • Current Level of Performance: • 40 WCPM • Benchmark • 92 WCPM • Peer Performance • 98 WCPM • GAP Analysis: • Benchmark/Target Student 92/40= 2+X difference SIGNIFICANT GAP • Benchmark/Peer 92/98= <1 X difference NO SIGNIFICANT GAP • Is instruction effective? Yes, peer performance is at benchmark.
Example- Behavior • Current Level of Performance: • Complies 35% of time • Benchmark (set by teacher) • 75% • Peer Performance • 40% • GAP Analysis: • Benchmark/Target Student 75/35= 2+X difference SIGNIFICANT GAP • Benchmark/Peer 75/40= 1.9 X difference SIGNIFICANT GAP • Peer/Target Student 40/35= 1.1X difference NO SIGNIFICANT GAP • Is behavior program effective? No, peers have significant gap from benchmark as well.
Referral Analysis • 42% Noncompliance • 30% Off-Task/Inattention • 12% Physical/Verbal Aggression • 6% Relational Aggression • 10% Bullying