1 / 40

BHS Plan to increase Literacy and the Performance Level on State, National and Career Exams

BHS Plan to increase Literacy and the Performance Level on State, National and Career Exams. Created by Mardi Loman 5/2011 Critiqued by BHS English Department. A Literacy Plan for Bloomfield High. CAPT. Students who cannot read, cannot pass CAPT

oral
Download Presentation

BHS Plan to increase Literacy and the Performance Level on State, National and Career Exams

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BHS Plan to increase Literacy and the Performance Level on State, National and Career Exams Created by Mardi Loman 5/2011 Critiqued by BHS English Department

  2. A Literacy Plan for Bloomfield High

  3. CAPT • Students who cannot read, cannot pass CAPT • Students who can read well, benefit from CAPT Prep All content teachers must be trained and made responsible for teaching literacy and CAPT skills

  4. High School Reading Issues Most high schoolers do not have the literacy skills needed in information age Elementary and middle schools seldom prepare students for higher level reading and thinking High School teachers not trained to teach reading; they teach content Source 1 - “Reading in High School”

  5. High School Reading Issues Reading instruction not owned by any department so it’s left to English Department Content teachers want to provide reading skills instruction, but want training and need supported practice High School Reading usually remedial Lack of funds, materials and support for H.S. reading programs Source 1 - “Reading in High School”

  6. Falling Literacy and HS Graduation Rate • EU • US • BHS Source 1 - “Reading in High School”

  7. Literacy problem in Great Britain Generation ago teens preferredTo Kill a Mocking Bird – Harper Lee RL=9 Wuthering Heights – Emily Bronte RL=11 Today’s Favorites Harry Potter series –J.K. Rowling RL=5.5 – 7.2 Twilight series -Stephanie Meyer RL=4.5 – 4.9 Source 3 - “Dailymail”

  8. Despite these obstacles • BHS students are improving in reading comprehension

  9. 2011 SDRT Grade 9

  10. But we are not nurturingour new growth

  11. Standard 5.1 3.4 2.9 4.8 9.1 11.1 Honors 10 7.6 4.0 6.6 3.9 More Homogeneous 5.2 Academic Less Heterogeneous AP Most Homogeneous

  12. Our heterogeneous classes are too diverse. 2.4 7.2 3.9 3.1 6.7 5.3 4.0 Per 5 Freshmen English

  13. What does the research show? Mixed-ability grouping also has problems, particularly that the academic curriculum may be diluted in an effort to teach a wide range of students. Source 5 - Adam Gamoran 2002

  14. Our grade level textbooks are way beyond frustration level for most. 11 2.4 7.2 3.9 13 3.1 6.7 5.3 4.0 Per. 7 U.S. History

  15. Our students don’t read and write enough at home

  16. Students must read, write, speak and think in class every day.

  17. Students must work as hard as their teachers

  18. Students read high school leveled text Per 7 Biology Per 1 Biology Per. 2 Biology R.L. 3 - 4 R.L 9 - 11 R. L. 5 - 6

  19. For Various Levels: • Content Curriculum, Big Ideas, Essential Questions the same • The Reading Skills and strategies the same, but may be presented differently • Writing and thinking skills the same, but may be presented differently • The Common Core State Standards/ embedded CAPT skills the same

  20. For Various Levels: • The content is what students are reading about in order to obtain the skill

  21. The Next Idea is Controversial!!

  22. R.L. = 13 Students will advance to the next class when their reading level has surpassed the designated class level. Flexible Reading Ability Grouping R.L. = 12 R.L. = 11 R.L. = 10 R.L.. = 9 R.L. = 8

  23. Climbing to the Next Rung • Teacher observation • Perfect or nearly perfect Reading skills CFA’s • Literacy Specialist tests and makes recommendation • Moves to next leveled textbook • Same or different class

  24. What does the research say? “Students who report being assigned to different tracks in high school become more unequal in their achievement over time, and the increase in inequality is greatest in schools where students rarely change tracks.” Source 2 – Gamoran 1992 Educational Leadership

  25. Literacy Specialists • Will be 3 next year • Will divide existing 6 Reading Classes • Will work with SRBI tier II and III students • Will teach, and monitor implementation of CAPT, reading, writing and thinking skills and strategies with content area teachers • Create, correct CFA’s, gather data • PD, New Teacher Institute, etc.

  26. Solving More Severe Reading Problems - SRBI Model Students with severe reading deficiencies beyond what can be remediated in Tier II - Students fix reading deficiencies with longer lasting Literacy Specialist support Scientific Researched Based Intervention Students with reading deficiencies beyond what can be remediated in Tier I content area classes - Students fix problems with temporary Literacy Specialist support Majority of BHS students - Common Core Standards infused into Reading in the Content area methodology

  27. Solving Classroom Discipline Problems - SRBI Students who have not fixed their documented discipline problems continue with Thursday Discipline Classes Scientific Based Research Intervention Students with discipline problems that disrupt learning must attend Tier II discipline classes - Students fix documented problems at temporary Discipline Classes Thursdays 12:40 – 2:15. Curriculum: meditation, yoga – think outside box Majority of BHS students – Reading in the Content area taught by the core teachers

  28. Inservice Accountability Model Literacy Specialist Identify literacy focus area Develop workshop lesson and scripts Train the trainers (PD committee) Trainers conduct interdisciplinary and department workshops All Implement literacy skills in the classroom Instructional leaders monitor and support teachers use of literacy focus Source 1 - Harvard Achievement Gap Conference Report 2009

  29. Inservice Accountability Model VP’s set up calendar for: Dept heads “walk thru” observe new focus area implementation Dept heads gather samples of corrected work and rubric Dept head discusses w/ VP rubrics, grading, teacher responses Teacher receives feedback VP includes literacy as part of teacher evaluation Source 1 - Harvard Achievement Gap Conference Report 2009

  30. Inservice Musts The Skillful Teacher Course – common language RBT Model – Higher Order Thinking Skills Teacher leaders attend workshops, etc. they train others Trainers present all workshops to new teachers Source 1 - Harvard Achievement Gap Conference Report 2009

  31. Which department will be exempt from our BHS Literacy Plan? • Nada niks (Afrikaans)لا شيء (Arabic) • asgjë(Albanian) 沒有 (Belarusian) none • Rien niente (Italian) 何(Japanese) • kitu (Swahili) không (Vietnamese)גאָרנישט (Yiddish)

  32. We can lead our school to success … other schools have

  33. A High School Transition Success Story

  34. 2009 High School Demographics 4,029 students 300 staff 56% Black 11.7 % Hispanic 69.4 free lunch “In one year, students’ failure rate on the ELA portion of the MCAS dropped from 44 percent to 23 percent, and the failure rate has since dropped to 5 percent. “ Source 1 - Harvard Achievement Gap Conference Report 2009”

  35. BHS Student Majority ADVANCED GOAL WE CAN DO THIS…. YES WE CAN!

  36. Accountablity • Exemplary High School - Brockton High • http://video2.harvard.edu:8080/ramgen/AGI/BrocktonAGIJune2009.rm

  37. Bibliography 1. Reading in High School http://oemanagement.com/data/_files/readinghs.pdf 2. Educational Research Journal Vol. 14 No. 2, Pages 301-313, Winter 1999

  38. Bibliography 3. March 3, 2011, Teenage literacy in steep decline as schoolchildren shun the classics and choose “easy books”, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1362459/Teenage-literacy-steep-decline-schoolchildren-favour-books-expected-reading-age.html#ixzz1MKxxMKV3

  39. Bibliography 4. Educational Research Journal,Vol. 14 No. 2, Pages 301-313, Winter 1999 5. Adam Gamoran Educational Leadership October 1992 | Volume 50 | Number 2 Untracking for Equity Pages 11-17 Synthesis of Research / Is Ability Grouping Equitable?

  40. Bibliography 6. http://www.conntesol.net/documents/ConnTESOL%20RTI%20presentation.pdf 7. The Achievement Gap Initiative at Harvard, How High Schools Become Exemplary, 2009 Conference Report, http://www.agi.harvard.edu/events/2009Conference/2009AGIReport.php 8. Langer, J. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 837–80.

More Related