1 / 28

Top-down Budgeting A Tool for Central Resource Management

Top-down Budgeting A Tool for Central Resource Management. John M. Kim Korea Inst. of Public Finance jhrv@kipf.re.kr. Outline. What is Top-down Budgeting? Historical Background Issues in Implementation Prerequisites Conclusion. Outline. What is Top-down Budgeting? Historical Background

onslow
Download Presentation

Top-down Budgeting A Tool for Central Resource Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Top-down BudgetingA Tool for Central Resource Management John M. Kim Korea Inst. of Public Finance jhrv@kipf.re.kr

  2. Outline • What is Top-down Budgeting? • Historical Background • Issues in Implementation • Prerequisites • Conclusion

  3. Outline • What is Top-down Budgeting? • Historical Background • Issues in Implementation • Prerequisites • Conclusion

  4. Top-down vs. Bottom-up • Top-down Bottom-up • Problems of Bottom-up Budgeting • Difficult to control aggregate spending • Sectoral allocations may not be optimal • Hard to keep multi-year perspective • Inefficient formulation process • Game-playing between budget office and line ministries • Ministries’ expertise under-utilized

  5. Top-down: Procedurally Defined • Budgeting in 2 Steps • Ceilings (aggregate numbers) • Decide total spending & deficit levels (agg. ceiling) • Inter-sectoral allocation among major policy areas (sectoral ceilings: about 30) • Intra-sectoral allocations (details) • Ministry/agency budgets

  6. Top-down: Functionally Defined • Division of Roles/Responsibilities • Ceilings (aggregate numbers) • Final decision by PM & Finance Minister • Focus on • Aggregate fiscal management • Medium-term perspective (multi-year ceilings) • Policy priorities • Intra-sectoral allocations (details) • Ministries formulate their own budgets • But must follow rules

  7. Benefits of Top-down Budgeting • Effective for fiscal consolidation • Easier to integrate with MTEF (MTBF) (ceilings are usually multi-year limits) • Ensures spending is aligned with priorities • Efficient in time and effort • Utilizes ministries’ expertise

  8. Outline • What is Top-down Budgeting? • Historical Background • Issues in Implementation • Prerequisites • Conclusion

  9. Fiscal Crises as Motivation • Huge deficits ca.1990 in OECD countries top-down introduced as tool for fiscal consolidation + prevent reoccurrence

  10. A Different Motivation (Korea) • Top-down adopted as key part of 4 fiscal reforms (multi-year, top-down, performance, program budgeting) • Emphasis on longer-term perspective Need to control anticipated spending growth in social welfare, etc. • Efficiency • Need to focus on broader policy priorities • Eliminate unproductive games in budget negotiations • Utilize ministries’ expertise • Need to focus on performance management, rather than controlling inputs

  11. Top-down & Bottom-up Compared • Bottom-up • Top-down - Ministry by ministry analysis that - Aggregate fiscal analysis that largely ignores economic forecasts takesinto account economic forecasts - Annual - Multi-year - Time consuming - Delegated authority - Ownership of proposals is more - Creates joint ownership of agency- specific proposals - Reactive - Proactive

  12. Complementary Approaches • Top-down approach should be complemented by bottom-up methods: • Information for evaluating new initiatives • Program reviews for monitoring programs/activities Approaches to Determining Expenditure Ceilings ○ : actively used, △ : used as reference, - : not used

  13. Outline • What is Top-down Budgeting? • Historical Background • Issues in Implementation • Prerequisites • Conclusion

  14. Determining Spending Ceilings • Overall Ceiling • Prudent Economic Assumptions (Growth, etc.) • Sensitivity analysis • Independent panel or private sector forecasting • Built-in bias toward lower growth forecast • Fiscal Rules for Good Discipline • Sweden: structural surplus of 2% GDP • Chile: Structural surplus of 1% GDP • UK: Balance current budget over econ. cycle • Surplus automatically goes to repaying debt

  15. Determining Spending Ceilings • Sectoral Ceilings • Must not affect overall ceiling • Usually overlap with ministerial boundaries (good program budget design) • New initiatives may be required to be funded by savings from existing programs

  16. Issues in Setting Ceilings • Operating vs. Capital Ceilings • Ministries tend to favor operating expenses • Denmark: separate ceilings for current & capital expenses • Sub-ceiling for salaries within operating ceiling • UK • Current expenses: Golden Rule • Capital expenses: Sustainable Investment Rule

  17. Issues in Setting Ceilings • Number of Ceilings • Korea (200+) vs. Sweden (27) • Optimal number is around 30 • More ceilings make budgeting decisions politically difficult • Need to give ministries room to exercise autonomy to ensure their proactive participation • This means Budget Office needs better tools: • Performance management • Information system to monitor execution • Enhanced analytical capacity for policy assessment

  18. Issues in Setting Ceilings • Buffers against Contingencies • Built-in buffers in prudent forecasts  Windfalls (repay debt, tax cuts, etc.) • Budget Margin • Overall Ceiling = Sect. Ceilings + Budget Margin • Covers unexpected changes (forecasts errors, etc.) and institutional reforms after ceilings were fixed • Usually does not cover new policy initiatives

  19. Issues in Setting Ceilings • Expenses Included in Ceilings? • Discretionary expenses usually included • Mandatory expenses (social security entitlements, etc., mandated by law) • Sweden, Korea, Chile, Netherlands: included • Canada, Denmark: excluded • Interest on debt • Sweden, Denmark: excluded • Chile, Netherlands, Korea: included

  20. Issues in Setting Ceilings • Funding for New Policy Initiatives • Sweden: must come from existing ceilings • Most countries have review process to judge new initiatives  adjust ceilings • Australia, Canada: Cabinet committees • Netherlands, Denmark: simply verify fit with coalition agreement • Chile: pooled “Bidding Fund” from savings on obsolete or poorly performing programs

  21. Outline • What is Top-down Budgeting? • Historical Background • Issues in Implementation • Prerequisites • Conclusion

  22. Prerequisites for Success • Good monitoring system to compensate for delegation of authority to ministries • Performance & program reviews • Information system to monitor execution • Policy capacity + Behavioral change • Budget Office: better forecasts & projections, need to defend fiscal rules aggressively, but work better together with line ministries • Ministries: need to learn internal allocation decision-making

  23. Prerequisites for Success • Strong PM & Finance Minister • Must be able to enforce ceilings • Commitment to rule-based budgeting • Remove arbitrariness in budgeting decisions, but leave room for flexibility and judicious discretion/autonomy • Support from the legislature

  24. Outline • What is Top-down Budgeting? • Historical Background • Issues in Implementation • Prerequisites • Conclusion

  25. Conclusion • Top-down budgeting is an effective approach to fiscal consolidation • Political will comes foremost; Top-down provides effective framework/tools • Framework fits well with multi-year fiscal discipline & rules-based budgeting • But, discipline tends to slacken as public finances improve • Many countries find it useful to have: • About 30 sub-ceilings for optimal inter-sectoral allocations • Separate ceilings for operating and capital expenditures • Budget margins as buffers against contingencies • Some flexibility in adjusting ceilings for new policy initiatives • Exclusion of mandatory spending differs by country

  26. Conclusion • Prerequisites for Success • From the Budget Office • Willingness to defend fiscal rules aggressively • Good monitoring + evaluation of spending programs • Better analytical capacity & ability to work together with ministries • From Line Ministries • Ability to prioritize and make own budgeting decisions • From PM & Finance Minister • Commitment to rule-based budgeting • Willingness/ability to enforce ceilings • From the Legislature • Support for rules and ceilings

  27. Conclusion • Despite common features & principles, practices differ by country. Some balance needs to be struck between strict discipline and flexibility, especially at initial stage. • Top-down system by itself does not guarantee good results • Political willingness to honor rules & principles is essential • Capacity of budget office (staff + systems) is also a major factor • Behavioral change must follow • But, overall, has delivered desired results in countries that have adopted it

  28. End of Presentation

More Related