slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 335 Views
  • Uploaded on

Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri Applying information and lessons learned from the 2001 Farmer Cooperatives Conference to Our Cooperative Thomas D. Larson Executive Vice President Member and Public Affairs

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri' - omer


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Restructuring for Troubled Times5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives ConferenceNovember 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri

Applying information and lessons learned from the 2001 Farmer Cooperatives Conference to Our Cooperative

Thomas D. LarsonExecutive Vice PresidentMember and Public Affairs

today s discussion
Today’s Discussion
  • Review 2001 value creation concept
  • What and how CHS implementing
  • What and how implementing local co-op
  • Performance management module
overview
Overview
  • Current co-op financial performance unacceptable
  • Ag supply has many untapped opportunities
  • Winning in future food landscape will be critical
  • Need to execute against a 5-part success model
value creation is a key metric
Value creation is a key metric

Return on

invested capital*

Value created

Cost of capital

Invested capital

=

X

ROIC

Annual return of investment above that expected given risk level

Rate of return required to compensate investors for risk

* Impact of extraordinary items excluded

value creation
Value Creation
  • Industry
  • Regional co-ops
  • Local co-ops
most ag segments destroy value

ESTIMATE

Most ag segments destroy value

Contribution to GDP, $ billions, 1999

Feed

Seed

Financing

Fuel and electric

Equipment

Ag chem

Fertilizer

Farm services

16.4% of U.S. GDP

Secon-daryproces-sing

Ag inputs

Farm produc-tion

Primary proces-sing

Food distri-bution

Input Distri-bution

Cost of capitalPercent

11.1

10.9

10.4

10.9

10.8

10.6

Value createdPercent, share of invested capital

-2.0

-7.0

-5.4

-1.1

-2.3

0.1

financial performance of distribution particularly poor
Financial performance ofdistribution particularly poor

ESTIMATE

Value created

$ Millions

Value created/ invested capital

Percent

Revenue

$ Billions

ROIC

Percent

Machinery

7.9

19

-2.5

-187

Feed

8.5

-53

16

-1.3

Fertilizer

9.1

-3.5

11

-122

12.6

Chemicals

0.1

11

2

-360

Total

57

-2.0

9.1

Input Distribution

-2,519

-7.0

138

3.9

regionals struggled to create value in 1999

ESTIMATE

Regionals struggled to create value in 1999…

Value created

$ Millions

Value created/ invested capital

Percent

Revenue

$ Billions

ROIC

Percent

-0.6

Farmland

11

Dairy Farmers of America

8

5.2

Cenex Harvest States

6

4.1

6

Land O’Lakes

1.6

1

Agrilink

5.2

value created across local co ops

Value created/ invested capital

Percent

Cost of capital

Percent

Value created**

$ Thousands

ROIC

Percent

Revenue**

$ Millions

Quartile*

1

14.2

24

5.1

9.2

248

2

6.3

27

-3.0

9.3

-169

3

26

-7.8

1.8

9.5

-424

4

-9.3

9.4

14

-18.7

-559

Total

-4.8

23

4.6

9.4

-227

Value Created Across Local Co-ops

* Segmented by value created/invested capital

** Mean values for co-ops in quartile

Source: Member co-op survey; team analysis

chs value creation eva
CHS Value Creation (EVA)
  • Mid 1990s
  • Executive management and board
  • Operating management
  • Financial measurement
  • Recognition program
eva economic value added
EVA(economic value-added)

Earnings minus (equity x minimum acceptable rate of return)

  • EVA recognizes there is no free capital
  • Equity represents an investment
  • Investor expects a return
chs co op performance measurements
CHS Co-op Performance Measurements
  • Profit
  • EVA
  • Cash Flow
  • ROI
  • Investment Grade
local co op value creation
Local Co-op value creation
  • 4% above cost of borrowed capital
  • 9 - 12% ROE
  • Numerous meetings
  • Benchmarking
slide14

% Greater than

Rate of # % of % of Local % of 50% Term Debt/

Return Accts. Sales Savings Accounts Local Equity

9%+ 216 52% 96% 39% 37%

5-9% 110 15% 15% 20% 16%

0-5% 108 17% 6% 20% 27%

Below 11716%(17%) 21% 49%

0%

Return on Local Equity Analysis

slide15

Cooperative System

Ag Supply Grain $ Sales

$(0-10) $(10-25) $(25-50) $(50-75) $(75-100) $(100+) Volume

--------------------------------------------

278 accounts

63% savings

--------------------------------------------

49 accounts

49% savings

9%+

5-9%

0-5%

Below

0

# accts. 216

savings- 96%

203 accounts

(10%) savings

23 accounts

(2%) savings

Summary

# accounts 481 # accounts 72

% savings 53% % savings 47%

Return on

local equity

pfp success model

2

4

Pursue operational excellence

Drive customer integration

5

Create performance obsession

1

3

Leverage

horizontal scale

Exploit vertical opportunities

PFP success model

Strategy

Structure

Existing

Emerging