Loading in 2 Seconds...

Selecting the Appropriate Statistical Distribution for a Primary Analysis

Loading in 2 Seconds...

- By
**omer** - Follow User

- 336 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## Selecting the Appropriate Statistical Distribution for a Primary Analysis

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Selecting the Appropriate Statistical Distribution for a Primary Analysis

P. Lachenbruch

A Study of Xeroderma Pigmentosa (XP)

- A characteristic of XP is the formation of Actinic Keratoses (AK s )
- Multiple lesions appear haphazardly on a patient’s back
- The rate of appearance may not be the same for different patients

Background

- Analysis: Rank Sum test.
- Late in study the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) was amended to use Poisson regression
- Unclear if stepwise selection of covariates was planned a priori

Study Results

- Poisson regression analysis showed highly significant treatment difference (p=0.009) adjusting for baseline AK, age, and age x treatment interaction (stepwise selection)
- All these effects were highly significant.
- Substantial outlier problem

Assumptions

- Each patient has the same incidence rate, per area unit.
- Chance of more than one AK in small area unit is negligible.
- Non-overlapping lesions are independent, that is, lesions occurring in one area of the body are not affected by those occurring in another area.

Outliers

- Outliers are observations that are jarringly different from the remainder of the data
- May be multiple outliers
- If frequency is large, this may be evidence that we have a mixture distribution.
- Can substantially affect analysis

Analyses

Two-Sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test

trt | obs rank sum expected

--------+---------------------------------

0 | 9 158 135

1 | 20 277 300

--------+---------------------------------

Combined| 29 435 435

unadjusted variance 450.00

adjustment for ties -15.07

----------

adjusted variance 434.93

Ho: ak12tot(trt==0) = ak12tot(trt==1)

z = 1.103

Prob > |z| = 0.2701

Distribution of AK Data at Baseline (Stem and Leaf)(Yarosh et al, Lancet)

Lead | Trailing digits

0* | 00000000000000000011223335

//

4* | 27

//

10* | 0 oops!

Distribution of 12 Month AK Total Data (Stem and Leaf)

. stem ak12tot,w(10)

Lead| Trailing digits

0* | 000000001111222233457

1* | 00345

2* |

3* | 7

//

7* | 1

8* | 9

//

19*| 3 same patient - in placebo group

Results of Poisson Analyses

Poisson regression Number of obs = 29

LR chi2(3) = 1044.65

Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

Log likelihood = -127.46684 Pseudo R2 = 0.8038

----------------------------------------------------------

ak12tot | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

---------+------------------------------------------------

age | .017 .0056 3.00 0.003 .0058 .0276

trt | .532 .167 3.20 0.001 .2061 .859

akb | .045 .0019 23.10 0.000 .0409 .0485

_cons | .658 .219 3.00 0.003 .2282 1.0878

----------------------------------------------------------

- G-O-F in control group, 2 =1222.5 with 8 d.f.
- G-O-F in treatment group, 2 =682.5 with 19 d.f.

Permutation Test

- Procedure: Scramble treatment codes and redo analysis. Repeat many (5,000?) times.
- Count number of times the coefficient for treatment exceeds the observed value.

Command and Output

. permute trt "permpois trt ak12tot age akb" rtrt=rtrt rage=rage rakb=rakb ,reps(5000) d

command: permpois trt ak12tot age akb

statistics: rtrt = rtrt

rage = rage

rakb = rakb

permute var: trt

Monte Carlo permutation statistics Number of obs = 30

Replications = 5000

----------------------------------------------------------

T | T(obs) c n p=c/n SE(p)

-------------+--------------------------------------------

rtrt | .5324557 2660 5000 0.5320 0.0071

rage | .0167116 3577 5000 0.7154 0.0064

rakb | .0446938 1118 5000 0.2236 0.0059

----------------------------------------------------------

Note: c = #{|T| >= |T(obs)|}

I deleted the confidence intervals for the proportions

Permutation Tests (2)

- Poisson with 5000 Replications
- Treatment: p = 0.57
- Age: p = 0.62
- AK Baseline: p = 0.28
- All significant results disappear

Results of Poisson Analysis

- Sponsor found that all terms were highly significant (including the treatment x age interaction).
- We reproduced this analysis.
- We also did a Poisson goodness-of-fit test that strongly rejected the assumption of a Poisson distribution.
- What does a highly significant result mean when the model is wrong?

Conclusions

- The data are poorly fit by both Poisson and Negative Binomial distributions
- Permutation tests suggest no treatment effect unless treatment by age interaction is included
- Justification of interaction term by stepwise procedure is exploratory
- Outliers are a problem and can affect the conclusions.

Conclusions (2)

- The results of the study are based on exploratory data analysis.
- The analysis is based on wrong assumptions of the data.
- Our analyses based on distribution free tests do not agree with the sponsor’s results.
- The results based on appropriate assumptions do not support approval of the product.

Suggestions

- Conduct a phase II study to determine appropriate covariates.
- Need to use appropriate inclusion / exclusion criteria.
- Stratification.
- a priori specification of full analysis

Reference

Yarosh D. et al., "Effect of topically applied T4 endonuclease V in liposomes on skin cancer in xeroderma pigmentosum: a randomised study" Lancet 357:926-929, 2001.

+-------------------------+

| sex trt akb ak12tot|

|-------------------------|

| F 0 0 5 |

| M 0 0 1 |

| F 0 0 1 |

| F 0 0 0 |

| F 0 1 15 |

|-------------------------|

| M 0 0 3 |

| F 0 100 193 |

| M 0 0 2 |

| M 0 2 13 |

| M 1 47 71 |

|-------------------------|

| F 1 0 0 |

| F 1 0 1 |

| F 1 0 0 |

| F 1 42 37 |

| F 1 2 0 |

|-------------------------|

+-------------------------+

| sex trt akb ak12tot|

+-------------------------+

| F 1 3 2 |

| F 1 0 10 |

| M 1 0 0 |

| F 1 0 2 |

| M 1 0 0 |

|-------------------------|

| F 1 0 0 |

| F 1 3 10 |

| F 1 1 0 |

| F 1 0 4 |

| F 1 5 3 |

|-------------------------|

| M 1 0 0 |

| F 1 0 2 |

| F 1 0 7 |

| F 1 3 14 |

| M . . . |

+-------------------------+

The DataNegative Binomial Model

- Need a model that allows for individual variability.
- Negative binomial distribution assumes that each patient has Poisson, but incidence rate varies according to a gamma distribution.
- Treatment: p = 0.64
- Age: p = 0.45
- AK Baseline: p = 0.0001
- Age x Treat: p <0.001
- Main effect of treatment is not interpretable. Need to look at effects separately by age.

Negative Binomial Results

- This model shows only that the baseline AK and age x treatment effects are significant factors.
- It also gives a test for whether the data are Poisson; the test rejects the Poisson Distribution: p<0.0005
- A test based on chisquare test (obs - exp) suggests that these data are not negative binomial.

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..