140 likes | 243 Views
Dive into the 7th Annual Performance Report Scorecard evaluating agency reports, focusing on transparency, public benefits, and leadership. Discover rankings, improvements, challenges, and insights on agency accountability.
E N D
7th Annual Performance Report Scorecardby Maurice McTigue, Henry Wray, and Jerry Ellig AGENDAWelcome Hon. Maurice McTigueStudy Results Dr. Jerry ElligRemarks and Awards Hon. Maurice McTigue and Hon. David WalkerQ&A Hon. Maurice McTigue
How we score the reports1-5 rating scale 3 Categories Transparency Public Benefits Leadership 4 criteria in each category
A caveat … This Scorecard evaluates only the quality of agency reports, not the quality of the results they produced for the public. Actual agency performance may or may not be correlated with report rankings in this Scorecard.
Big movements • Most improved criterion: Accessibility (#1) • Most deteriorated criterion: Linkage of results to costs (# 8) • Biggest improvers: Treasury, Defense, Ag • Biggest drops: Justice, NSF, Social Security
New this year • Scorecard vs. OMB’s PART • Budget-weighted scores • Guidance for fiscal 2006
Scorecard vs. PART • 75% of spending covered by reports scoring below 8 on Public Benefits • 10% of PARTed spending is “results not demonstrated”
For more information Mercatus guidance for fiscal 2006 reports: www.governmentaccountability.org/scorecard/guidelines Detailed scoring notes for each report: www.governmentaccountability.org/scorecard/agencies New Mercatus analysis of PART: www.governmentaccountability.org/PART2007