1 / 13

Magnetized stellar envelopes and buoyant flux ropes II: 3-d simulations

Magnetized stellar envelopes and buoyant flux ropes II: 3-d simulations. Bertil F. Dorch (1, 2) Copenhagen University Library, The Royal Library The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University. Menu. The general idea Summary of last years results (2-d)… 3-d low resolution, toy model

odetta
Download Presentation

Magnetized stellar envelopes and buoyant flux ropes II: 3-d simulations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Magnetized stellar envelopes and buoyant flux ropes II: 3-d simulations • Bertil F. Dorch (1, 2) • Copenhagen University Library, The Royal Library The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  2. Menu • The general idea • Summary of last years results (2-d)… • 3-d low resolution,toy model work-in-progress • Conclusions • Todo… Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  3. The general idea: Buoyant flux rope • The current solar-like dynamo paradigm •  - type: poloidal fields ↔ toroidal fields via the -effect, -loops and the so called -effect • Flux tube dynamos • R-T instability  buoyant magnetic flux tubes = twisted flux ropes (done this 12 years ago) • Ropes work well within this framework… … but there are many questions – and skeptisism is healthy • How is the twist generated ? • How much twist is necessary ? • Is this picture at all correct ? • Here: How will a poloidal field affect the rise of toroidal ropes? And what about the twist ? Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  4. Back of the envelope • “Poloidal” layer in convection zone: • Define fundamental parameters χ Brope / Bcz ε Bcz / Bφ • So that χε = f(Ψ) constant for varying Bcz • Primary parameters are χ and sign of twist • The Sun has χ๏ > 100 kG / Beq ≈ 10 • Toy rope • Textbook buoyant rope making dent in transverse layer χ > χc = √ (γ 2 Hp0/R) …for the rope to ascend… Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  5. Making a simple model • Numerical full MHD simulations: Idealized model • 2.5-d (last year): For higher resolution (2048² points) and for simplicity + speed • 3-d: For low resolution (200100200) toy experiments with long rope: λ = 25 Hp • Idealized “convection zone” (2.3 Hp) • Polytrop, stable stratification • High buoyancy for speed: β ~ 100 « solar large scale • Textbook twist pitch angle ~35°  ÷kink ÷R-T • R ~ 0.14 Hp0 χc = 5 and χε ~ 4 Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  6. 2-d: Bz in reference model and χ ~ 20 Reference modelanti-twist (-) χ ~ 20 The qualitative differences are clear ! Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  7. 2-d: Magnetic field vectors (anti-twisted rope) Current sheet  Current sheet can carve away twisted field (flux)… Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  8. 3-d: Buoyant loop ascending into magnetic layer Anti-parallel twist (-) χ = 9 Similarities to photospheric and coronal flux emergence B² Qualitatively rope is naturally influenced by the magnetic CZ! Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  9. 3-d: Bz in reference model and χ ~ 9 Apex No CZ field: Reference model Anti-parallel twist (-) χ = 9 Parallel CZ field (+) χ = 9 Feet The rope’s apex is skewed for both signs: More so when anti-twisted Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  10. 3-d: Flux rope height as a function of time 2-d ref. model 3-d ref. model 3-d non- magnetic • Stronger anti-parallel twist are ascending more efficiently… … below a certain limit (too strong CZ field damp rise anyway) Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  11. Conclusions Flux rope dynamics • Rise speed and amplitude depend on strength and sign of the poloidal field: • Anti-parallel twisted ropes reach higher, faster • χ > χc = √ (γ 2 Hp0/R) holds approximately, but slightly better for 3-d Flux rope topology • The geometrical shape of ropes depends on the poloidal field: • Anti-parallel twisted ropes are flatter • Skewness of rope shape (depending on sign) Flux rope twist • Reconnection reduces twist of anti-parallel ropes • i.e. effect should vary if alternating cycles… Other 3-d effects • Draining • Buoyant acceleration • Motion of CZ field along the rope (parting of field lines) • Horizontal tension • Resolution effects ? 2048³ is currently impossible ! Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  12. TODO: What will the future bring? • Todo • 3-d with Klaus Galsgaard & Vasilis Archontis ! • Higer resolution: Possibly with the AN-MHD code.. ? • With deep stratified convection ! • With self-consistent poloidal field (dynamo) ! Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

  13. Reklame… www.scholarpedia.org Session III, DFS Årsmøde 2007, Nyborg

More Related