1 / 19

Innovative Sidewalk Travel Solution Development

Join Christina Fenn, Patrick Wheeler, and the team to revolutionize urban transportation with a more cost-effective and efficient alternative to the Segway HT. Our mission is to create a portable device that enables eco-friendly sidewalk travel, offering speed and maneuverability in congested city environments. Explore our technical goals, preliminary schedule, project timeline, budget report, challenges, accomplishments, and improvement strategies. Let's shape the future of urban mobility together!

odessa
Download Presentation

Innovative Sidewalk Travel Solution Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transportation Group Christina Fenn Patrick Wheeler Rob Benkovic Brian Brown Vince Crossley Ryan Botzler Nick Lynch

  2. Segway HT • Changed the way we think about sidewalk travel • Provided a cheaper, environmentally safe alternative to automobiles • Uses revolutionary new technology to balance and control a 2 wheeled vehicle

  3. Our Mission • To design and construct a significantly cheaper and more efficient alternative to the Segway HT

  4. Goals for the Project • Make sidewalk travel in a city environment much easier • Provide an environmentally safe alternative to automobiles • Allow people to travel at up to 3 times the speed of walking • Maintain a “user-friendly” control system • Allow for easy maneuverability through crowed areas • Keep lightweight and portable

  5. Technical Goals • 2 front drive wheels with either 1 or 2 heavy-duty casters in the back • 2 independent reversible motors allowing for a 0 degree turning radius • Rechargable 12 or 24 volt batteries • Handgrip operated accelerator/decelerator controls • Aluminum frame

  6. Preliminary Schedule • 1/15-2/12 Initial Planning • 2/12-2/19 Order Scooter • 2/19-2/25 Take Apart Scooter…Order Wheels, axels, gears, speed controllers • 2/26-3/1 Continue analyzing scooter…organize parts and materials • 3/2-3/11 Spring Break • 3/12-3/18 Finalize design plans…Order framework, bearings, bolts, plating • 3/19-3/26 Begin building motor/wheel/battery setup • 4/3-4/9 Build framework, incorporate drivetrain • 4/10-4/17 Finish construction, test and fine-tune product • 4/18 FINISH

  7. Actual Project Timeline • 1/15-2/25 Project Planning (1 week behind) • 2/26-3/1 Order scooters (1 week behind) • 3/2-3/11 Spring Break • 3/12-3/18 Analyze Scooters…Organize Parts and Materials (2 weeks behind) • 3/19-3/26 Modify scooter frame, develop new project design, meet with Prof. Haller about motor control, order motor controls • 4/3-4/9 Finalize Design, begin build wheel/gear setup, order aluminum plating (2 weeks behind) • 4/10-4/17 Continue wheel/gear construction, attach handlebars, purchase final parts, build throttle controls, put together wiring harness • 4/18-4/24 Attach caster, bolt together frame, attach motor, speed controls • 4/25 Fine tune and test, FINISH (1 week behind)

  8. Initial Budget

  9. Expense Report

  10. Project Components

  11. Challenges • Limited timeframe • Limited technical knowledge • Needed lots of research • Problems finalizing design • Difficulty finding necessary components • Difficulty scheduling meeting times

  12. Accomplishments • Capable of both forward and reverse motion • Accomplishes 0 degree turning radius goal • Semi-portable, can be lifted by one person (approx. 50-60 lbs.) • About shoulder width and only 17” long, allowing for easy maneuverability through crowds • 11” Platform allows user to see above crowds

  13. Needs Improvement • Slow acceleration and reaction time by motors • Gear ratio does not provide enough power • Single caster can become unstable at higher speeds • Inefficient use of space • Forced to put motor controls outside of the body

  14. How to Improve • Spend more time testing and analyzing strengths and weaknesses • Enable more direct control of wheel speeds • Cut back on weight allowing for quicker acceleration • Design and build a more efficient frame • Incorporate charging capability

More Related