1 / 22

Jose G. Guillem, MD, MPH Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Defining the Colorectal Surgeons role in patients with colorectal cancer and limited metastatic disease. Jose G. Guillem, MD, MPH Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Great Debates & Updates in GI Malignancies March 28-29, 2014. Case.

odelia
Download Presentation

Jose G. Guillem, MD, MPH Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defining the Colorectal Surgeons role in patients with colorectal cancer and limited metastatic disease Jose G. Guillem, MD, MPH Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Great Debates & Updates in GI Malignancies March 28-29, 2014

  2. Case • 58M with 10lb weight loss, rectal pain/tenesmus, bleeding • PMH: unremarkable • DRE: palpable tethered mass with distal margin at 8cm from AV, 5cm above ring • Flex sig: circumferential, ulcerated bulky near-obstructing mass • CT scan: liver metastases

  3. Stage IV Rectal Cancer

  4. Stage IV Rectal Cancer

  5. Management Options in Metastatic Rectal Ca • Systemic Chemotherapy alone • Stent and Chemotherapy • Divert and Chemotherapy • Resect and Chemotherapy • Chemotherapy and Resect • Chemotherapy, Chemoradiation and Resect

  6. Central Issues • Benefit of surgical resection over stent/diversion alone • Alleviation of bleeding, pain, tenesmus • Morbidity and mortality of resection • Delay in administering systemic chemo

  7. Metastatic Rectal Cancer • Bulky symptomatic primary with extensive liver mets • Bulky symptomatic primary with limited liver metastases • Non-bulky asymptomatic primary with extensive liver mets • Non-bulky asymptomatic primary with limited liver mets

  8. Palliation of malignant rectal obstruction with self-expanding metal stents • 33 successful stents out of 34 pts (97%) Stent migration x 3 Intractable pain x 2 Incomplete stent expansion x 1 Incontinence x 1 Rectovesical fistula x 1 Incontinence x 1 Overall, 18% required surgery because of stent complications Hünerbein M et al. Surgery. 2005

  9. Malignant rectal obstruction within 5cm of the anal verge: is there a role for expandable metallic stent placement? • Group A: obstruction ≤ 5cm from AV • Group B: obstruction > 5cm from AV • Tx: PU or PTFE covered retrievable stents Song HY et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008

  10. Radical resection of rectal cancer primary tumor provides effective local therapy in patients with stage IV disease • N=80 with rectal CA resection without radiotherapy • 12 (15%) surgical complications • 1 death • 4 reoperations • 15 (19%) required colostomy at initial resection • 5 (6%) local recurrences • Median time to local recurrence = 14 mos • Median survival = 25 mos • 11 patients died within 6 mos Nash GM et al, Annals of Surg Oncol, 2002.

  11. Radical resection of primary in stage IV rectal cancer patients – who benefits? • <50% liver replacement • Complete or near complete response of primary to first chemo regimen • Able to receive subsequent aggressive, post-operative chemo Nash GM et al, Annals of Surg Oncol, 2002.

  12. Would modern, combination chemotherapy obviate the need for resection of the primary rectal cancer?

  13. Combination chemotherapy without surgery as initial treatment • 233 patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer • 93% of patients who received upfront chemotherapy never required palliative surgery for primary tumor • 89% required no direct symptomatic management for intact primary tumor Poultsides et al. J Clin Oncol 2009

  14. Combination chemotherapy without surgery as initial treatment Poultsides et al. J Clin Oncol 2009

  15. Would modern, combination chemotherapy obviate the need for resection of the primary rectal cancer? In some, initially yes, but if combinational chemotherapy converts unresectable liver mets to resectable, in the long run we may need to address the primary rectal cancer in more.

  16. Anastomotic leak following low anterior resection in stage IV rectal cancer is associated with poor survival • N = 123 pts resected with curative intent 3y OS 72% Multivariate analysis for overall survival 3y OS 32% Factors identified as significant in univariate analysis for Overall Survival (OS) Overall leak rate 6.5% Smith JD et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013

  17. Management Dilemma Morbidity Efficacy

  18. Treatment Pathway Stage IV Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases Obstructed Non-obstructed No Extrahepatic Metastases Extrahepatic Metastases Resect Stent Divert Resectable Liver Metastases Nonresectable Liver Metastases Chemotherapy Isolated, Single, or Peripheral Bilobar or Multiple Resect metastases and rectum if possible Resect Liver Chemotherapy Resectable Rectum Nonresectable Rectum Resect Rectum Chemoradiation Therapy

  19. Treatment Pathway Stage IV Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases Obstructed Non-obstructed No Extrahepatic Metastases Extrahepatic Metastases Resect Stent Divert Resectable Liver Metastases Nonresectable Liver Metastases Chemotherapy Isolated, Single, or Peripheral Bilobar or Multiple Resect metastases and rectum if possible Systemic vs. HAI Resect Liver Chemotherapy When, and in what order? Resectable Rectum Nonresectable Rectum Synchronous vs. Staged Chemotherapy first, then radiation? Short-course vs. long-course? Resect Rectum Chemoradiation Therapy

  20. Management Options in Unresectable Metastatic Rectal Ca • If symptoms of primary (bleeding, pain, tenesmus) are formidable and volume of liver mets limited (<50%) : Resect primary • If patient cannot tolerate rectal resection: Laparoscopic diversion • Defer stenting rectal cancer as last resort

  21. Metastatic Rectal CA – Chemotherapy, Radiation, Divert, Stent or Resect First? • Multidisciplinary approach throughout • Colorectal surgeon: Bulk/lumen of primary, CRM, sphincter preservation, co-morbidities? • Liver surgeon Resectability of mets, status of liver parenchyma, co-morbidities • Medical/Radiation Oncologist Co-morbidities, volume:primary vs mets

  22. Metastatic Rectal Cancer – Chemotherapy, Radiation, or Surgery First? Individualize, Individualize, Individualize

More Related