1 / 18

Global economic crisis and Brüning‘s government, 1929-32 Lecture 11 17 April 2012

HIST2133. The Weimar Republic through Documents, 1918-1933. Global economic crisis and Brüning‘s government, 1929-32 Lecture 11 17 April 2012. The Crisis of Democracy, 1929-32: 3 factors. 1) Mass unemployment (≥ 6 million) + 2) Art. 53 of Weimar Constitution

nyoko
Download Presentation

Global economic crisis and Brüning‘s government, 1929-32 Lecture 11 17 April 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HIST2133. The Weimar Republic through Documents, 1918-1933 Global economic crisis and Brüning‘s government, 1929-32 Lecture 11 17 April 2012

  2. The Crisis of Democracy, 1929-32:3 factors 1) Mass unemployment (≥ 6 million) + 2) Art. 53 of Weimar Constitution → ‘Presidential government under Brüning ► First step into an authoritarian regime ► Weimar democracy already at stake + 3) NSDAP election results = Successive dissolution of Weimar Republic

  3. ‘Black Friday’: 25 Oct 1929 • Collapse of NY Stock Exchange due to long US overproduction • US credits to G redrawn + US protective customs • Depression tendency in G accelerated = G industrial production decreased to 1903-4 levels ► Rapid decline of salaries & living standards ► Massive unemployment: 1,2 Mill. (1929) → 6 Mill. (Jan 1932)

  4. Results • Fall of Chancellor Müller’s SPD & DVP government over economic & social issues (Mar 1930) ► ‘Self-acquittal’ of SPD from power • New CP Brüning government as ‘presidential cabinet’ appointed by Reich President (art. 53) ► Hindenburg’s concession to Brüning to make use of art. 48 (state of emergency) if needed = Major turn in WR politics+ power

  5. Reichstag election, Sep 1930 Decisive break-through of NSDAP: • High voters’ turn out • Decline of DNVP • Voters from lower middle-class + various other strata of society • Financial subsidies from big industry much less important than Hitler’s own charisma

  6. 1928 - 1930: SPD 29,8 - 24,5 % NSDAP 2,6 - 18,3 % KPD 10,6 - 13,1 % DNVP 14,2 - 7,0 % DVP 8,7 - 4,5 % DDP 4,9 - 3,8 % July – November 1932 NSDAP 37,3 - 33,1 % SPD 21,6 – 20,4 % KPD 14,3 – 16,9 % DNVP 5,9 – 8,3 % DVP 1,2 – 1,9 % DDP 1,0 – 1,0 % NSDAP in Reichstag elections

  7. NSDAP after re-founding in 1925 • Munich branch effectively party headquarter • Hitler’s claim for absolute leadership + personal orders to sub-leaders ☺ ≠ Strasser’s bureaucratic structure ☻ • Hitler’s concept of SA as party force ☺ ≠ Röhm’s concept as military force ☻ • 30-36 districts lead by Gauleiter (district leaders) + local party branches leaders • Special party organisations + professional associations as wider mass networks

  8. NSDAP characteristics • Internal symbols of Hitler’s charismatic rule: A) Super-power position B) Embodiment of heroism + sacred mission + greatness + devotion C) Decision-making as ‘action and example’ without formal limitations • External symbols of Führer cult: • Heil Hitler’, Hitler Youth, propaganda (Goebbels) • Sub-leaders in ‘blood brotherhood’ with feudal loyalty to Hitler • Führer myth → ‘Hitler Party’

  9. NSDAP agitation + propaganda • Rites + symbols, parades of NS organisations • Rallies: 1926 Weimar, since 1927 Nuremberg • Election campaigns: Mass rallies, flags, films, Hitler’s flights through Germany = Omnipresence, actions, dynamism, technical modernity, H’s charisma → Movement of the ‘Young-and-fresh’ = Flag consecrations, martyr cult for fallen Nazis, oaths for loyalty + sacrifice, terror + attacks on political enemies → ‘Fighting Movement’ ► Actionist ‘movement’ style + irrational heroism ≠ rational discourse, compromise, pluralism, democracy

  10. Hitler’s Way to Power:8 explanations • Political: Versailles Treaty • Economic: Economic crises • Institutional: Weimar constitution • Sociological: Lower middle class • Ideological: Authoritarian tradition • Marxist: Necessary crisis of capitalism • Mass psychology: Propaganda • Personality: Hitler

  11. Brüning government Oct 1930-May 1932 • Over 40% of Reichstag deputies from NSDAP + KPD + DNVP after Sep 1930 elections • No coalition possible between pro-Republican parties due to ideological divisions • No new election wished due to anticipated further rise of NSDAP + KPD + DNVP → Toleration of Brüning government by SPD: “Brüning the lesser evil than Hitler”

  12. Brüning’s deflation policy • Strong cuts in government’s spending esp. in civil service • Massive increase of + introduction of new taxes → To raise competitiveness of G products abroad → To demonstrate to Allies willingness to pay reparations = Deflation policy with clearly foreign policy intentions

  13. Results • After major bank crisis → G’s severe financial crisis (spring 1931) ☺ Final end of all reparations (Jun/Jul 1932) ☻ No end of economic crisis → Deflation policy cuts government expenditures in economy + lowers buying- power of people = Self-destructive mechanism ≠ J.M. Keynes’ idea of temporarily expanded public debts

  14. Economic crisis 1931-2 • Huge unemployment • Decrease of unemployment subsidies • More people receive only welfare subsidies = No active government plan to fight but only to manage crisis ► Strong decline of trust in government ► Brüning’s public appeals no longer believed ► Hopes faded for improvement of situation

  15. Presidential elections 1932 • Pro Hindenburg: SPD, Centre Party, BVP, DDP, DVP (not DNVP) • No absolute majority in 1st round: 49,6% for Hindenburg, 30,4% for Hitler • Absolute majority in 2nd round: 53% for Hindenburg, 36,9% = Hindenburg regarded lacking support of DNVP as ‘personal humiliation’ → Increasing lack-of-trust in Brüning’s political skills

More Related