380 likes | 470 Views
Explore neutrino masses, leptogenesis, and cosmic mysteries. Understand neutrino properties, experiments, and implications for the universe's composition and origins. Delve into Majorana neutrinos, standard model violations, and subatomic puzzles. Join the quest for answers in neutrino science.
E N D
The Incredible Foresight of ETTORE MAJORANA Haim Harari Erice, September 1, 2006 Neutrino Masses, Leptogenesis and Beyond
The Foresight Can you tell a neutrinofrom an anti-neutrino? MAJORANA n may be its own antiparticle !
Is nMassless or Very Light? “Direct” experiments m (ne) < few eV Theory No good reason for massless n. Simple argument for very light n. n is the only “chargeless” particle. All quarks and leptons “Dirac Mass” n also “Majorana Mass”
0 m m L Is nMassless or Very Light? M1 ~ O(L) M2 ~ O(m2/L) “See-Saw” L m n Majorana Mass Gell-Mann, Ramond, Slansky, Yanagida
Solar Neutrinos The sun emits 1038n per second. 1029 go to direction earth. Per 100 ton detector - 40 hits per month Homestake n + Cl37 e +A37 400 ton C2Cl4 Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein
Kamiokande Super - Kamiokande Kamiokande n+ n e + p 50,000 ton/clean water
GALLEX n + Ga71e +Ge71 30 ton
GALLEX n + Ga71e +Ge71 30 ton SNO 1000 ton D2O (+2 ton Salt) 10,000 phototubes ne + d e + p + p (charged Current) nx + dnx + p + n (Neutral Current) nx + e nx +e (Elastic Scattering) Count total n – flux and ne - flux
Solar Model is Right! Neutrinos Oscillate Neutrinos have Mass m(nm) ~ 8 meV q12Large
Kamland – Japan R R KAM R R L ~ 180 km E ~ O (MeV) Probe: ∆m2<<eV2
KAMIOKANDE: N(nm) N(ne) = 1.2 !!! m(nt) ~ 50 meV Cosmic Radiation Energetic protons arrive p Pions created in atmosphere In p-decay: N(nm) N(ne) atmosphere p = 2 m e ne nm nm earth
The Universe 70% Dark Energy 25% Dark Matter 4% H, He 0.5% Heavy Nuclei 0.5% Neutrinos m(nt) ~ 50 meV m(nm) ~ 8 meV m(ne) ~ smaller Large angles! Also K2K, MINOS,others
meV meV eV keV MeV GeV TeV -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2nd 3rd Generation 1st Q c u t 2/3 s d b -1/3 Quarks ne? nm? nt? 0 m t e -1 Leptons ( ) ( ) ( ) u d c s t b “The Standard Model” ( ) ( ) ( ) ne e nm m nt t
meV meV eV keV MeV GeV TeV -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2nd 3rd Generation 1st Q c u t 2/3 s d b -1/3 Quarks nt nm ne? 0 t e m -1 Leptons ( ) ( ) ( ) u d c s t b “The Standard Model” ( ) ( ) ( ) ne e nm m nt t
Why are we here? B-Violation (also L-Violation) CP-Violation Non-equilibrium (also no “wash-out”) Sakharov-1967 B-Violation (and L-Violation) p-decay GUT scale or higher Not seen (but SN87A!) n-oscillations and mass CP-Violation KM phase for quarks (requires 3 generations) CP-violation in leptons (requires 2 generations) WHEN AND HOW DID IT HAPPEN?
Why are we here? At Big Bang: B=0 , L=0 (also B-L=0) We need to create a nonzeroB (also B-L?) “Leptogenesis”(other theories: GUT, electroweak) : If we could create a nonzero L and then trade B for L, we could create a positive B. IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO TRADE B for L WE MUST ALSO CREATE B-L
B – L is conserved (and must be nonzero) B + L is violatede.g. D(B + L) = 6 is allowed B and L violation in the standard model (but no B-L) (qiqjqk) (qiqjqk) (qiqjqk) (ℓiℓjℓk) “instanton” terms: i,j,k = generations “SPHALERON”: Connecting degenerate ground states L and B can change (together) each by 3 UNITS (for Ng =3) THE STANDARD MODEL CREATES (together) B AND L
Note: • ↔ n is possible u d d u n e- Neutrino oscillations m(n) ≠ 0, very small m2 M 0 m m M Seesaw mechanism: m(n) ~ Hence: n is a Majorana neutrino <nn> ≠ 0, n-nmixing, heavy neutrino with mass M L=0 AT BIG BANG BUT DL ≠ 0 PROCESSES ARE ABUNDANT ! The universe is made of QUARKS and LEPTONS e+ n
The particle, which is its own antiparticle, is responsible for having more particles than antiparticles in the universe LEPTOGENESIS At BigBang: B = L = 0. Majorana: DL≠0 and D(B-L)≠0are allowed. Hence, the universe has L≠0 and B-L≠ 0 . LEADING TO B≠0 !!! (Elaborate quantitative estimates). e.g. Buchmueller-Peccei-Yanagida NEUTRINO COGITO ERGO SUM
And in 2056 – for Majorana’s 150th birthday . Perhaps it all happens at the subparticle level !? Warning No evidence for subquarks and subleptons. No reasonable dynamical theory
Why q and ℓhave simple charge ratios? ( +2/3, -1/3 ) (0, -1) The Quark - Lepton Connection Why p and e+ have same charge? Why SQi = 0 for q’s and ℓ’s in one generation? [ SQi = (-1) + (0) + 3(+2/3) +3(-1/3) = 0 ] Why three colors and three generations? PREONS? TOY MODELS?
Q SU(3) SU(3) N N 3(B-L) V H T C T 3 3 1 0 1 + 1/3 V 0 3 3 0 1 -1 V 0 3 3 0 -1 1 - 1/3 T 3 3 -1 0 -1 color color n d u e- VVV VVT VTT TTT (0) (- 1/3) (- 2/3) (-1) 1 3 3 1 e+ u d n TTT TTV TVV VVV (+1) (+2/3) (+1/3) (0) 1 3 3 1 “Antimatter” “Matter” e- TTT e+ TTT p TTT(TT)(VV)(VV) p TTT(TT)(VV)(VV) HH+Seiberg Rishons SU(3)H Singlets Anomaly cancellation: NH = NC = NG = 3 Buchmann+Schmid
HH+Seiberg Q SU(3) SU(3) N N 3(B-L) V H T C T 3 3 1 0 1 + 1/3 V 0 3 3 0 1 -1 V 0 3 3 0 -1 1 - 1/3 T 3 3 -1 0 -1 color color n d u e- VVV VVT VTT TTT (0) (- 1/3) (- 2/3) (-1) 1 3 3 1 e+ u d n TTT TTV TVV VVV (+1) (+2/3) (+1/3) (0) 1 3 3 1 “Antimatter” “Matter” Rishons SU(3)H Singlets TO BREAK B-L WE NEED TO BREAK N Simplest J=0, Q=0, SU(3)H – singlet, SU(3)C – singlet IS <VVVVVV> : BREAKS L, HENCE CREATES B V <VVVVVV>≠0 ERGO SUM
Measuring Masses and Angles Clues for Theory “Beyond the Standard Model” Neutrino Astronomy UHE Cosmic Neutrinos Dark Matter Z nn nin Nucleosynthesis - Less Double-Decay n- Decays n -Magnetic Moments Heavy n Sterile n
ETTORE MAJORANA WAS NO FOOL WAS BRILLIANT !!! Neutrino Masses, Leptogenesis and Beyond