1 / 10

Pakistan WASH Information Management LESSON LEARNT

This article discusses the lessons learned and challenges faced in managing WASH information in Pakistan, including data cleaning, quality control, and follow-up actions. It also highlights the importance of accurate and timely reporting and suggests improvements for future data management.

nwebster
Download Presentation

Pakistan WASH Information Management LESSON LEARNT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PAKISTAN • WASH • CLUSTER Pakistan WASH Information ManagementLESSON LEARNT

  2. Data management • E-mail/Google Group management • Wednesday – 3W files from Hubs • Data Cleaning/Quality Control • Check the Excel Spreadsheet for missing information/inconsistencies • Follow-Up by email/phone calls to IMs • Data Compilation-Sindh and Balochistan • Calculate number of individuals with household size of each with 7.

  3. Data Analysis • Number of beneficiaries reached of and activities – NDMA, OCHA & UNICEF • Water: Hands Pump Installed, Hands Pump Repaired, DWSS, WTUs • Sanitation: Dry Pit Latrine, Emergency Latrine, Flush/Pour Latrine, VIP • Hygiene: Hygiene Promotion • NFIs: Hygiene Kits

  4. 3W Maps • WASH coverage by District/Taluka • WASH Active IPs • WASH activity Maps (HP/DWSS/WTUs/Latrines etc) • Request on Provincial needs

  5. 3W reporting

  6. Revised 3W (Oct 2011)

  7. Challenges • Missing Information/blank records (start and end date, geographical locations, units, beneficiaries etc • Multiple names in one row (IPs, geographical locations Taluka, UCs etc) • Duplication/double reporting (same activity with same geographical location, units, beneficiaries etc • Low frequency of reporting on 3W • Qc: 3W records-14,500

  8. Missing Information/blank records

  9. Multi IPs/Geographical locations in one row

  10. Looking Forward • Clean and qualitative/quantitative data (IMs will support the IPs) • One row for one activity/IP/geographycal location • Report on revised 3W (Project code and title) • Weekly reporting, only the new activities to avoid duplication. • IPs active on the ground are encourage to report on 3W for the clear picture.

More Related