1 / 15

Reflective Practice

Reflective Practice. Leadership Development Tool. Context. recognised that a key differentiator between places where people wanted to work and places where people did not want to work was “Leadership” staff with varying degrees of training ie short courses to Masters

nusa
Download Presentation

Reflective Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reflective Practice Leadership Development Tool

  2. Context • recognised that a key differentiator between places where people wanted to work and places where people did not want to work was “Leadership” • staff with varying degrees of training ie short courses to Masters • staff with varying degrees of experience

  3. Context • needed ongoing development approach to maintain skill development • needed approach which provided opportunity for staff to reflect on whether “words matched actions” • needed approach which facilitated learning from each other

  4. The Project – ‘Using Reflective Practice and action learning as strategic management tools’ • a twofold purpose: • make a contribution to the skill development of a group of managers at Northern Health Service (NHS) • produce data that could be used to develop better ways of using RP approaches in the health industry • action research was the research methodology used

  5. Action Research • a family of research methodologies involving: • a collaborative problem solving relationship between researcher and client aimed at solving problems, building skills and generating new knowledge • this involves the researcher and client in collaborative cycles of planning, taking action, observing, reflecting and evaluating (Cherry, 1999, Dick, 1991 & Coglan & Brannick, 2001)

  6. Reflective Practice • an approach to management and organisation development that integrates or links thought and action with reflection • ‘…a process of disengaging from or stepping back from an experience and taking time to deliberately and carefully review it, think about it and construct meaning from it’ (Doyle & Young, 2000, p. 18) • requires participants to assume the perspective of an external observer, to identify assumptions & feelings underlying their practice, how these impact their practice & determine if they need to change to be more effective

  7. Reflective Practice Groups • they create a space different from the everyday activities of managers where participants can help one another, through cycles of reflection & action, explore the events, issues and feelings that stem from their roles, under the guidance of an experienced facilitator • can positively affect professional growth & development – leading to greater self-awareness • enable managers to distinguish their espoused theory & theory-in-use so their actions more closely reflect their intent • generate new knowledge about professional practice • can also be time-consuming & involve some personal risk as practice is questioned • require participants to be open to potentially sensitive aspects of their practice – beliefs, values and feelings

  8. Project Design - what we did • the RPG’s: • agreement between RMIT and NHS to proceed based on previous work • ethics approval from RMIT & NHS • invitation to all managers at TNH & BHS • information sessions conducted • interested staff allocated to a group (6 in total) • RMIT staff member allocated to a group

  9. What we did • Evaluation • 5 focus groups were conducted by an RMIT staff member who did not facilitate the group • 5 interviews were undertaken with senior managers whose staff had taken part • an interim and final report was provided to the NHS Executive with findings and recommendations • Analysis • data was transcribed and analysed using a modified form of grounded theory • Ethics approval was obtained from RMIT & NHS ethics committees

  10. Findings – Focus Groups (1) • overwhelmingly a place where managers felt supported, could trust others when exploring issues & discussing risky/confidential matters, in a non-judgemental setting • enjoyed being challenged, opportunity for feedback, a much needed opportunity for time out to reflect on events, issues & feelings stemming from their roles • noticed modest but significant changes: • specific changes to behaviour eg. dealings with staff • need to develop support systems for selves as managers • more likely to stop and think & felt they had more options • more strategic • better able to delegate & handle difficult interpersonal situations

  11. Focus Groups (2) • Contributing factors: • positive group dynamics – listening, developing trust, being non-judgemental • the presence of a skilled facilitator was important to: • manage the group • model appropriate behaviours • offer ideas based on practical & theoretical knowledge • provides an outsider perspective • Improvements • these focussed on meeting frequency (fewer/longer), group composition (similar levels in hierarchy & site based, mixed regarding professional background) and group size (not too small)

  12. Senior Management Interviews (1) • assessment of the impact of RPG’s based on conversations with members & direct observations • some limitations in opportunities to observe direct reports • reported a number of general benefits & particularly noted that participants had more insight into the impact of their own behaviour, especially those with no formal management training • RPG participants reported the value of time & space to discuss issues especially related to managing staff • capacity to network with peers they previously had little contact with • work in RPG’ contributing positively to other change efforts

  13. Senior Management Interviews (2) • changes they observed focussed on general improvements in a broad range of skills especially communication & interpersonal skills and the capacity to take more initiative • at least three of the groups planned to continue to meet • wanted to see RPG’s implemented more strategically (to increase the pace of change) & broadly (in the longer term) • participation should be part of a mgt development activity • managers have an important role in helping staff involved consolidate their learning • senior managers needed to commit to RPG’s if they expected staff to • preference for groupings based on similar levels in hierarchy and mixed in terms of professional backgrounds

  14. The collaboration • the staff from NHS and RMIT designed, conducted and evaluated the project collaboratively – owning it and shaping it jointly • we met as a RPG throughout • research, learning, organisational action and reflection were integrated • organisational benefits & impacts are beginning to be felt, learnings about the doing of reflective practice in busy organisational contexts are developing and research/knowledge outcomes emerging for both parties • relationships strengthened

  15. Where to now? • include reflective practice as part of an overall leadership development strategy • complement reflective practice with opportunities for leadership training, seminars and tertiary education • facilitate reflective practice sessions explore organisational identified issues and participant identified issues

More Related