1 / 45

Eric Vazquez 2012 APS-Division of Nuclear Physics Conference

Control study of surface bias emission in 2-particle correlations in Au+Au at √ s NN = 200 GeV in PHENIX . Eric Vazquez 2012 APS-Division of Nuclear Physics Conference. Probing the quark gluon plasma. RHIC: Heavy-ion collisions at √ s NN = 200 GeV :

nuri
Download Presentation

Eric Vazquez 2012 APS-Division of Nuclear Physics Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Control study of surface bias emission in 2-particle correlations in Au+Au at √sNN = 200 GeV in PHENIX Eric Vazquez 2012 APS-Division of Nuclear Physics Conference

  2. Probing the quark gluon plasma • RHIC: Heavy-ion collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV: • Evidence of strongly interacting colored medium • Strongly interacting medium induces parton energy loss 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  3. Probing the quark gluon plasma • Nuclear modification factor (RAA) was first crude indicator of energy loss. • Compare final state particle production with a “control” system ( scaled proton-proton collisions ) • However, little sensitivity to precise energy loss mechanism 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Significant energy loss

  4. Probing the quark gluon plasma • Nuclear modification factor (RAA) was first crude indicator of energy loss. • Compare final state particle production with a “control” system ( scaled proton-proton collisions ) • However, little sensitivity to precise energy loss mechanism • 2-particle correlations provide a probe associated with jets that is sensitive to path length traversed in strongly interacting medium. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  5. 2-particle correlations at RHIC • Triggering on events with high-pT tracks is an efficient way to probe jet production. “trigger” high-pT track Df 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting “associated” lower-pT track

  6. 2-particle correlations at RHIC • Triggering on events with high-pT tracks is an efficient way to probe jet production. “trigger” high-pT track Df 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting “associated” lower-pT track

  7. Jet measurements at RHIC • Both PHENIX and STAR have provided a wealth of measurements providing insight into jet-quenching at RHIC. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  8. Jet measurements at RHIC • Both PHENIX and STAR have provided a wealth of measurements providing insight into jet-quenching at RHIC. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Both experiments observe jet-quenching for away-side pairs!!

  9. Surface bias emission • However…. • Why is the away-side jet quenched while the near-side jet is not? 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  10. Surface bias emission • However…. • Why is the away-side jet quenched while the near-side jet is not? 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Unmodified pair production Strongly interacting medium

  11. Surface bias emission • However…. • Why is the away-side jet quenched while the near-side jet is not? 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Unmodified pair production Modified pair production Strongly interacting medium

  12. Surface bias emission • Can we reduce the “surface bias”? • Some proposals to reduce “surface bias” • 2+1 correlations: require two high-pT “triggers" high-pT track Unmodified pair production 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Modified pair production Strongly interacting medium

  13. Surface bias emission • Can we reduce the “surface bias”? • Some proposals to reduce “surface bias” • 2+1 correlations: require two high-pT “triggers“ high-pT track Reduction surface bias high-pT track 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Strongly interacting medium

  14. Surface bias emission • Can we reduce the “surface bias”? • Some proposals to reduce “surface bias” • 2+1 correlations: require two high-pT “triggers“ • g-h correlations: Colorless probe high-pT track Reduction surface bias high-pT track 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Strongly interacting medium

  15. 2+1 di-hadron correlations 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  16. Conditionally triggered events • 2 high-pT track requirement “trigger” high-pT track Df = p 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting high-pT track “conditional”

  17. Conditionally triggered events • 2 high-pT track requirement • Both high-pT tracks separated in azimuth by: “trigger” high-pT track Df = p Dftc 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting high-pT track “conditional”

  18. 2+1 correlations pair distribution • Pair distribution is constructed from a high-pT trigger relative to other lower pT fragments “trigger” high-pT track Dfta “associated” tracks 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting high-pT track “conditional”

  19. 2+1 di-hadron correlations • 2006 p+p at √sNN = 200 GeV 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  20. 2+1 di-hadron correlations • 2007 Au+Au at √sNN = 200 GeV 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  21. Background subtraction • Subtraction is done under the two-source model assumption: • Flow modulated background is modeled by convoluting three single particle flow distributions “background” “correlation” “jet” 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  22. ZYAM procedure • To determine background level, the Zero Yield at Minimum (ZYAM) procedure is employed. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  23. ZYAM procedure • To determine background level, the Zero Yield at Minimum (ZYAM) procedure is employed. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  24. Jets: 2+1 di-hadron pair distributions • 2006 p+p at √sNN = 200 GeV 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  25. Jets: 2+1 di-hadron pair distributions • 2007 Au+Au at √sNN = 200 GeV 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  26. Jet yields • Can extract the yield due to jets from 2+1 correlations 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  27. Jet yields • Can extract the yield due to jets from 2+1 correlations Integrate near-side from –p/3 to p/3 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  28. Jet yields • Can extract the yield due to jets from 2+1 correlations Integrate away-side from 2p/3 to p 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  29. Ratio: near-side to away-side • Define ratio: 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  30. Ratio of Integrated Yields(Near-side to Away-side) • Ratio of near-side to away-side integrated yields 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Harder fragments in the direction of higher pT track

  31. Ratio of Integrated Yields(Near-side to Away-side) • Ratio of near-side to away-side integrated yields 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  32. Ratio of Integrated Yields(Near-side to Away-side) • Ratio of near-side to away-side integrated yields 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  33. g-h correlations 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  34. The “golden channel” • Photons are “colorless” probes: (i.e. DO NOT interact with strongly interacting colored medium) • Use as photon as calibration for modified away-side jet 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  35. g-h correlations • Comparison of Au+Au to p+p correlations • Extract yields by integrating away-side correlation. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  36. g-h correlations • Comparison of Au+Au to p+p correlations • Extract yields by integrating away-side correlation. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  37. Fragmentation yields vs. zT 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting Suppression at highzT(low x)

  38. Modification significant? • Define different integration regions and compare results. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  39. Modification significant? • Define different integration regions and compare results. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  40. Modification significant? • Define different integration regions and compare results. • Suppression significant regardless of integration region!! 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  41. Conclusion • A modification is seen in Au+Au to the topology of the 2+1 correlations. • Harder fragments tend to be biased in the direction of the highest pT track. • Ratio of near-side to away-side yields show significant modification relative to 2006 p+p collision system • Are we reducing surface bias with 2+1 correlation measurement? • Further studies are needed to determine source of modification • Modification is seen in g-h correlations at high zT. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  42. BACK UP 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  43. 2007 PHENIX detector • Measuring hadrons: • Tracking done via drift chambers and pad chambers • Ring imaging Cerenkov detector allows us to segregate hadrons from electrons below 5 GeV 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  44. Measuring 3 tracks in PHENIX • Remind ourselves that the 2+1 correlation is really a 3-particle measurement. • PHENIX previously published methodology for measuring 2-particle correlations in a limited acceptace detector through event-mixing. • Key point: Can recover physics correlations as long as pair efficiencies can be approximated by single particle efficiencies. 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

  45. Measuring 3 tracks in PHENIX • Extend logic to three tracks: • The single particle efficiencies are given by event-mixing which leads to a three event-mixing technique (similar to two event-mixing technique used in 2-particle correlations) 2012 APS-DNP Fall Meeting

More Related