1 / 34

LIFE ENVIRONMENT 2005 DEMONSTRATIVE PROJECT

Berlin, 14 th – 15 th January, 2006. LIFE ENVIRONMENT 2005 DEMONSTRATIVE PROJECT. SAPID Strategy for Agricultural Products Identity Defence Wide Area Protection of Agriculture Products Identity from GMO Pollution. Dr. Gaetano Sinatti ASSOCIAZIONE TERRE DELL’ADRIATICO

nova
Download Presentation

LIFE ENVIRONMENT 2005 DEMONSTRATIVE PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Berlin, 14th – 15th January, 2006 LIFE ENVIRONMENT 2005 DEMONSTRATIVE PROJECT

  2. SAPIDStrategy for Agricultural Products Identity DefenceWide Area Protection of Agriculture Products Identityfrom GMO Pollution Dr. Gaetano Sinatti ASSOCIAZIONE TERRE DELL’ADRIATICO via C. Pisacane, 32  60019 SENIGALLIA (AN)  ITALY tel. 0039-071-7930864http://www.adrialand.it

  3. Project typology LIFE ENVIRONMENT 2005 demonstrative project Specific aim 5.2 “reduction of environmental effects during the utilization stage of products and services” see: • Regulation (CE) n. 1682/2004 of September the 15th, that changes the Regulation (CEE) n. 1655/2000 of July the 17th, 2000 concerning the financial tool for the environment (LIFE); • Request of the European Commission for proposals for LIFE Programme 2004-2005 (2004/C 252/07) C 252/9 of October the 12th, 2004. 3

  4. Aim of the project IDENTIFY METHODS AND TOOLS • to Prevent GMO contamination of qualityagricultural products; • to Preserve their identity; in a CO-EXISTENCE REGIME 4

  5. Partnership Promoter: ASSAM Partners: ASSOCIAZIONE TERRE DELL’ADRIATICO ASTERIA s.r.l. ISTITUTO ZOOPROFILATTICO MARCHE-UMBRIA COMUNE DI URBINO REGIONE MARCHE TERRABIO s.c.a.r.l. 5

  6. Promoter ASSAM (Agenzia Servizi del Settore Agro-alimentare Marche) Marche Region Agrofood Sector Services Agency Public body Extension Agency via Alpi, 21 - 60131 - Ancona ITALY tel. 0039-071-8081 Fax: 0039-071-85979 - www.assam.marche.it 6

  7. Partner 1 ASSOCIAZIONE TERRE DELL’ADRIATICO No profit Organic Farmers Private Association organic farming services & vocational training via C. Pisacane, 32  60019 SENIGALLIA (AN)  ITALY tel. +39-071-7930864 fax +39-071-7912529 http://www.adrialand.it 7

  8. Partner 2 ASTERIA s.r.l. Agenzia per lo Sviluppo Tecnologico e la RIcerca Applicata Technological Development and Applied Research Agency Public/private Body Research Institute via 81.a Strada, 19 63033 MONTEPRANDONE (AP) tel. + 39 0735 703761 fax + 39 0735 711424http://www.asteriasrl.it 8

  9. Partner 3 ISTITUTO ZOOPROFILATTICO MARCHE UMBRIA Zooprophylaxis Institute for Marche and Umbria Regions Public Body Food Security & Controls Agency via G. Salvemini, 106126PERUGIA (PG) tel. + 39 075 343261fax + 39 075 323 297http://www.pg.izs.it 9

  10. Partner 4 COMUNE DI URBINO Muncipality of Urbino Public Body Local Government via Puccinotti, 361029 URBINO (PU) tel. + 39 0722 3091fax + 39 075 323 297http://www.comune.urbino.ps.it 10

  11. Partner 5 REGIONE MARCHE – Servizio agricoltura Marche Region (Agriculture Sector) Public Body Regional Government via Gentile da Fabriano, 960125 ANCONA (AN) tel. + 39 071 8061fax + 39 0718062410http://www.regione.marche.it 11

  12. Partner 6 TERRABIO s.c.a.r.l. Organic Producers Cooperative Organic Farming Agrofood Production via Battista Sforza, 58/6061029 URBINO (PU) tel. + 39 0722 58178fax + 39 0722 599329 12

  13. Project Aim 1 PROJECT AIMS - 1 • Analyse the GMOstate-of-the-art in agricultural sector and the problems concerning accidental contamination of productions – through collecting and cataloguing the existing literature; •    13

  14. Project Aim 2 • Map the different aspects of the local situation at a regional level, with informatic (GIS) tools • (productions flows, location of critical areas, productions at risk, etc.); •    14

  15. Project Aim 3 • Analyse legal context, paying particular attention to technical-juridical and disputes at law coexistence problems in agriculture; •    15

  16. Project Aim 4 • Identifying, monitoring, surveying and controlling tools and methods to be applied on wide areas by public institutions in charge of checking and preventing GMO pollution; •    16

  17. Project Aim 5 • Identify general practices, methods and procedures to be used by production, transformation and trading single or associated firms to prevent GMO pollution; •    17

  18. Project Aim 6 • Develop and certify GMO-free products Identity Preservation methods and standardsfor farmers and producers’ Associations refusing the use of GMO in their production (e.g. Organic farmers); •    18

  19. Project Aim 7 • Train up public officers in the use of surveying, monitoring and controlling techniques already identified and tested on field; •    19

  20. Project Aim 8 • Train up entrepreneurs in the use of GMO-free products Identity Preservation certified standards; •    20

  21. Project Aim 9 • Constitute an usable on-line permanent database and technical forum to exchange knowledge and experience about coexistence. • Disseminate at EU level the obtained technical/operative results. 21

  22. TASK 1 – MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING TO THE EC 1.1 – Establishment of a working-group 1.2 – Assignment of roles, duties and tasks 1.3 – Internal training 1.4 – GO/NO GO analysis 1.5 – Reporting systems 1.6 – Feasibility study 1.7 – Planning of the managerial, administrative and accounting control, risks analysis, alternative technical plans. 22

  23. TASK 2 – STATE-OF-THE-ART ANALISYSABOUT GMO/NON GMO COEXISTENCE • 2.1 – Collecting the existing bibliography (researches, studies, pubblication, comunications, ecc.) about GMO diffusion in agriculture and about problems connected with their coexistence; • 2.3 – Analisys of the statistical and distributive data of the agriculture production system and identification of critical areas for coexistence; • 2.3 – Data processing on GIS. • Results: • 1. DATABASE containing the state-of-the-art about GMO/non GMO coexistence; • 2. GIS CARTOGRAPHY of the TERRITORY ASSESSMENT 23

  24. TASK 3 – ANALYSIS OF LEGAL CONTEXT • 3.1 – Collecting both the set of rules at EC, national, regional level, and the technical regulation (proceedings and technical analysis, sampling methods); • 3.2 – Conflictual aspects analysis: different regulation levels (EC, national, regional and local); disputes at law; possible solutions; • 3.3 – Evaluation standards and methods for damages due to Gmo accidental. • Results: • IDENTIFICATION of juridical tools for technical-administrative control and for disputes at law resolution; • IDENTIFICATION of technics and methods to evaluate economical and environmental damages. 24

  25. TASK 4 – WIDE AREA OPERATIVE GMO POLLUTION CHECKING MODELS • 4.1 – Map possible sources of Gmo spreading and contaminating material in agrofood chain; • 4.2 – Evaluate GMO presence analysis technics and methodologies in agrofood chain and related costs; • 4.3 – Evaluate coexistence monitoring technics and methodologies in risk areas and related costs; • Results: • OPERATIONAL MODELS FOR GMO CONTAMINATION CHECK; • OPERATIONAL MONITORING MODELS FOR COEXISTENCE CRITICAL AREAS; • ELABORATION OF REGIONAL COEXISTENCE PLAN 25

  26. TASK 5 – PROTECTION AGAINSTGMO CONTAMINATIONAND IDENTITY PRESERVATION METHODS • 5.1 – Set up methods for prevention and protection from GMO pollution in farms and no GMOagrifood firms; • 5.2 – Set up precautionary methods to be adopted in farms belonging to the GMO supply chains; • 5.3 – Costs and cost/effective relation analysis; • 5.4 – Certify and recognize Identity Preservation Management Systems. • Results: • SETTLEMENT OF AN IDENTITY PRESERVATION DISCIPLINARY FOR AGRIFOOD PRODUCTS • IDENTIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL NEEDS AT LOCAL LEVEL (logistics, platforms, laboratories, etc.) 26

  27. TASK 6 – TESTING ON REPRESENTATIVESUPPLY CHAINS • 6.1 – Identify coexistence critical homogeneous areas; • 6.2 – Inform agrofood system operators in such identified areas; • 6.3 – Test identity preservation certification standards and checking methods, with particular attention to cereal and zootechnical supply chains; • 6.3 – Systemic (economical, logistical, legal) interaction analisys. • Results: • METHODS AND STANDARDS FIELD-TEST RESULTS • METHODOLOGY CORRECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION • INTERACTIONS TESTING (public/private, producer-consumer, economical-environmental) • SET UP OF THE REGIONAL INTEGRATED COEXISTENCE PLAN 27

  28. TASK 7 – SUPPLY-CHAINS OPERATOR TRAINING PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (7) • 7.1 – Plan vocational training courses for producers, processing, trading and distribution operators, professional organizations’ and consumers’ representatives; • 7.2 – Prepare appropriate didactic material; • 7.3 – Carry out training courses for target-groups, enabling the operators to apply Identity Preservation and GMO pollution prevention methodologies and certification standards; • 7.4 – Training results testing. • Results: • BEST PRACTICESINTRODUCTION AND SPREADING ALL OVER THE TERRITORY • TRAINING ACTIONS RESULTS EVALUATION 28

  29. TASK 8 – CONTROL OFFICER TRAINING PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (8) • 8.1 – Plan vocational training courses for officers, technicians • and managers from controlling and monitoring centres; • 8.2 – Prepare appropriate didactic material; • 8.3 – Carry out training courses to target-groups, enabling the public control operators to adopt checking and monitoring best practices and to apply correctly the Regional Coexistence Plan; • 8.4 – Test the training results. • Results: • BEST PRACTICE INTRODUCTION AND SPREADING ALL OVER THE TERRITORY • TRAINING ACTIONS RESULTS EVALUATION 29

  30. TASK 9 – DISSEMINATION OF RESULTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (9) • 9.1 – Certification standards formalization; • 9.2 – Knowledge instruments preparation: booklets, brochures, web-pages, videocassettes, cd-roms; • 9.3 – Translations in English, French, German, Spanish, Polish; • 9.4 – Results spreading towards OGM Free Regions Working Group, Professional Organizations, Local Government bodies, etc.; • 9.5 – Create an Internet Web-site (www.sapidelife.net), containing all project technical and operational information. • Results: • KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION AMONG OPERATORS • TRANSNATIONAL SAPID TECHNICAL INFORMATION PERMANENT EXCHANGE THROUGHOUT OPERATORS 30

  31. SAPID ACTIVITY LOCALIZATION PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (9) 31

  32. SAPID OGANIZATION CHART PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (9) 32

  33. www.sapidlife.net – www.sapidlife.org PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (9) 33

  34. Project Timeline PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS (9) PROJECT DURATION: 42 MONTHS 1st NOVEMBER 200530th APRIL 2009 34

More Related