1 / 27

What Sustains Fiscal Consolidations in Emerging Market Countries?

This study examines the factors affecting the persistence of fiscal consolidation in emerging market countries and proposes a new approach to defining spells of fiscal consolidation. It applies this new approach to a sample of emerging market countries and finds that the probability of ending a fiscal adjustment is influenced by previous fiscal failures, deficit size, spending composition, and total revenues.

nottingham
Download Presentation

What Sustains Fiscal Consolidations in Emerging Market Countries?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What Sustains Fiscal Consolidations in Emerging Market Countries? Sanjeev Gupta International Monetary Fund

  2. Outline • What are the factors affecting the persistence of fiscal consolidation in emerging markets? • New approach proposed for defining spells of fiscal consolidation. • Empirical application of the new approach to a sample of emerging market countries. • The results indicate that the probability of ending a fiscal adjustment is affected by the legacy of previous fiscal failures, the size of the deficit, the composition of spending, and level of total revenues.

  3. Background • Controlling public debt and implementing durable fiscal adjustments remain major challenges. • Public debt in emerging markets has risen sharply in the mid-90s, now it exceeds 70 percent of GDP. • There potential risks of increasing public debt in emerging market countries, including to macro stability. • Importance of safeguarding fiscal sustainability (quasi fiscal activities; contingent liabilities).

  4. Background • There are many benefits of fiscal consolidation: • For countries with unsustainable debt burdens, the benefits of sustained fiscal reforms are largest. • Fiscal adjustment can reduce interest rates and expectations of larger future tax liabilities, generating a positive wealth effect in the private sector. • Fiscal consolidation can signal that policymakers are committed to long-term fiscal sustainability with positive effects on private investment.

  5. Background • The persistence of fiscal consolidation is also important: • Fiscal consolidations that are short lived can be harmful for growth. • Persistent fiscal imbalances reduce national savings, leading to lower private investment and more tepid economic growth.

  6. Methodology • What determines the persistence of fiscal adjustment? • Alesina and Perotti proposed a two-step procedure to answer this question (Traditional Approach) : • Identify episodes of large fiscal consolidation. Successful consolidation is defined as the maintenance of fiscal control over a specified period of time. • A comparison of the main characteristics of “successful” and “unsuccessful” episodes is provided.

  7. Methodology • Studies employing this approach to a sample of industrial countries during the 1980s and 1990s find that: • Fiscal adjustments that rely primarily on reducing outlays on transfers and the wage bill are more likely to be sustainable. • Revenue increases are easily reversed and lead to short-lived adjustments.

  8. Methodology • Critics of this approach have noted the following: • The classification of episodes (into successful and unsuccessful consolidations) is arbitrary. • Causal inferences cannot be made on the basis of the simple comparison of group averages. • This approach does not provide a description of how long adjustments typically last. • It does not assess the factors that influence the duration of fiscal consolidation episodes.

  9. Methodology • Alternative methodologies have been proposed to address the last shortcoming • However none of the methods deals with the first three problems of the traditional approach

  10. Methodology • A new approach to has been used: duration analysis. • A number of recent papers have tackled the issue of how to model the duration of fiscal adjustment. • In these studies, the duration of fiscal consolidations over time is endogenous to the covariates of sustained fiscal consolidation determined through survival analysis. • This new method makes use of all the information available in the data, rather than constraining the analysis to episodes of large fiscal consolidation.

  11. Duration Analysis • Assess the factors affecting the probability of ending a fiscal consolidation period; • A fiscal consolidation ends when the deficit reductions falls below a given threshold; • The duration of fiscal adjustment is based on fiscal consolidation spells; • The probability of ending the adjustment is mathematically linked to the duration.

  12. Duration Analysis • Fiscal adjustment spells can have different durations. • For example one spell lasting three years means a continuous reduction of the fiscal deficit over this period. • Three spells lasting each one year are periods in which the fiscal consolidation is interrupted and then restarted.

  13. Duration Analysis • Two functions are critical to duration analysis. • Hazard rate. This is equivalent to the mortality rate in human population. • Survival function. Proportion of individuals surviving at the end of the period over individuals at risk at the beginning of the period.

  14. Duration Analysis Model specification: • The hazard rate is a function of country’s characteristics similar to ordinary regression. • The regressors rescale the baseline hazard function. • The baseline hazard function does not need to be specified (Cox proportional hazard model).

  15. Duration Analysis • Adam and Bevan provide a useful typology of the definition of “fiscal consolidation and persistence”: • (1) the “level” approach, which provides a specified threshold for the deficit; • 2) the “gradient” approach, under which a fiscal consolidation is considered ongoing in year t as long as the deficit falls in year t relative to t-1 (e.g., by ½ percentage point of GDP); and • (3) the composite approach or a combination of (1) and (2).

  16. Duration Analysis • The level and gradient approaches both have methodological weaknesses. • First, the level approach imposes a common threshold on a diverse group of countries facing different policy environments. • Second, the level approach classifies as a “failure” instances where significant fiscal adjustments may have already taken place. • Weaknesses in the gradient approach as well.

  17. Duration Analysis • A more suitable approach seems to be a “composite” approach. • This approach recognizes that further reductions in the fiscal deficit are difficult as an economy moves closer to sustainable deficit levels. • The distance from sustainable deficit levels may signal the commitment (or lack thereof) to fiscal sustainability. Moving closer to sustainable levels may therefore reinforce government credibility.

  18. Duration Analysis • We use two definitions of sustained fiscal consolidation. • First, the baseline model defines the persistence of fiscal consolidation on the basis of the gradient approach, but conditions the estimates of the probability of ending the fiscal consolidation effort on the existing level of budget deficit. • Second, an alternative estimate is presented in the robustness section, where the definition of sustained fiscal consolidation is based explicitly on both a specified minimum rate of reduction of the fiscal deficit and a specified threshold for the targeted level of the deficit.

  19. Data • This paper examines fiscal adjustment in a sample of 25 emerging markets over the period 1980-2001. • Periods of fiscal adjustment are identified by the observed change in the overall fiscal deficit as a share of GDP. (above 1 percentage point of GDP). • The results of the nonparametric analysis suggest that 56 percent of the episodes of fiscal consolidation end within a year. • Also use primary surplus to check robustness (it reduces the sample size)

  20. The Model • The probability of interrupting a spell of fiscal consolidation is regressed on fiscal and macroeconomics variables that are likely determinants of the duration of the adjustment. • The fiscal variables include: (1) fiscal history, measured as the number of previous failures at fiscal consolidation; (2) the composition of spending and (3) the level of total revenue in percent of GDP. • The model also controls for: (4) the stock of initial debt in percent of GDP; (5) increases in oil prices; (6) exchange rate depreciation; (7) unemployment rate; (8) corruption; and (9) the interaction between corruption and capital spending.

  21. Baseline Results • The probability of ending a spell of fiscal adjustment is positively and significantly affected by fiscal history, or the number of previous failures at fiscal reform. • Exchange rate depreciation and corruption are also positively associated with failure, though this result is weaker and much less robust. • The level of public debt is negatively associated with the risk of ending a spell of consolidation. • Expenditure composition matters. • Buoyant tax revenues support fiscal adjustment in emerging markets.

  22. Baseline Results • The distance from the deficit threshold is positively associated with the probability of ending fiscal adjustment. • Sustained fiscal consolidation becomes easier as the fiscal policy stance moves closer to the deficit threshold.

  23. Robustness • The results are robust to alternative specifications. • The dummies for IMF-supported programs and capital accounts crises are all insignificant • The negative impact of debt and the distance variable increases with duration of the spell. The positive impact of capital spending on fiscal consolidation is offset by the adverse impact of increased corruption.

  24. Alternative Definition • We generate a new dummy variable called “failure,” which takes a value of one when the annual variation of the budget deficit is equal to or lower than 1 percentage point of GDP and the deficit is more than 2 percentage points of GDP (lack of adjustment), and takes a value of zero otherwise (years of fiscal consolidation). • Using this definition, the average survival rate after one year of fiscal consolidation increases from 44 percent in the baseline model to 52 percent in the current model.

  25. Results • The new regression results are similar to the baseline results. • In contrast to the baseline results, the change in exchange rate and the level of spending on goods and services are no longer significant. • One important departure from the baseline results is the insignificance of the initial stock of debt.

  26. Conclusions and Policy Implications • The reallocation of public expenditure toward more productive uses is important for achieving more sustained fiscal adjustments. • Revenue increases are also found to be critical to the persistence of fiscal consolidation. • Poor governance and high unemployment are obstacles to achieving sustained fiscal adjustments.

  27. Conclusions and Policy Implications • These results imply that: • Strong institutions and a good policy track record are critical to achieve fiscal sustainability. • Fiscal deficit reductions should be based on cuts in wasteful spending and revenue mobilization efforts. • Revenue increases are associated with more durable fiscal adjustments. Enhancing revenue collection also helps minimize fiscal vulnerability stemming from low and volatile revenue bases. • In view of the adverse effects of unemployment on the persistence of adjustment, there is an important role for social safety nets in ensuring there is a social consensus in favor of fiscal consolidation.

More Related