200 likes | 380 Views
Mainland, Hong Kong SAR and Macau SAR Intellectual Property Symposium 2003 China Intellectual Property Training Center, Beijing. THEME : Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Hong Kong. ~ By C. K. Kwong ~ Sit Fung Kwong & Shum http://www.sfks.com.hk.
                
                E N D
Mainland, Hong Kong SAR and Macau SAR Intellectual Property Symposium 2003China Intellectual Property Training Center, Beijing THEME : Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Hong Kong ~ By C. K. Kwong ~Sit Fung Kwong & Shumhttp://www.sfks.com.hk
I. Brief Outline of the Present Judicial Procedures A. Civil Procedures Cease and Desist Letter  demands: - an undertaking not to infringe - delivery up - disclosure of past dealings - payment of damages - contribution of legal costs
 Less due diligence before action to save costs Legal Action in the Civil Court  writ  Statement of Claim”  Ex-parte Injunction  Anton Piller K G v. Manufacturing Process Ltd. [1976] CH.55 (CA)
 Interlocutory Injunction American Cyanamid v. Ethicon  Defence  Reply  Other interlocutory applications - further & better particulars, interrogatories, security for costs  Summons for Directions - evidence - trial  Summary judgment
Costs  hourly rates (barrister) HK$2,500 per hour from a reasonably competent junior counsel to HK$8,000 per hour for a Senior Counsel  Solicitors hourly rate ranges from HK$1,000 to HK$4,500  Usually costs recoverable is approximately 60% to 70% of actual amount spent  Difficult to estimate costs. It depends on how aggressive will the litigation be conducted by the parties.
B. Criminal Procedures and Remedies  Copyright Ordinance  Trade Descriptions Ordinance  Judicial Trend
II Reform on Civil Procedure Rules Consultation Paper  “Civil Justice Reform : Interim Report and Consultative Paper” November 2001  report on other relevant jurisdictions, review the Hong Kong situation
 formulate proposals for reform  The Woolf reforms in England used as a frame work  Aim to address problems of expense, delay, complexity and inequality in resources  New system be just, fair, efficient, user friendly, economical and practical  80 proposals put forward
Common Complaints  Too expensive  Too slow  Lack of equality  Too uncertain  Too complicated  Misuse of adversarial system  Take up disproportionate judicial resources
Themes for possible reforms  Proportionality  Re-defining procedural requirements  Encouraging earlier settlement  Limiting interlocutory application  Giving court greater case management  Minimising hearings  Introducing costs transparency  Exploring use of voluntary ADR
Comments from Lord Woolf himself  The idea of proportionality. More complex procedures for more complex case. Small disputes should have simple, cheap and speedy procedure  go to the court only as a last resort  No. of cases dropped by one-third  Court only encourage alternative dispute resolution but cannot order it
 Problems include - Balancing between certainty and flexibility - Controlling costs while encouraging lawyers to incur expenses before litigation starts I.e. “front loading” - inconsistencies in the application of the broad powers  won’t degenerate into a trial by expert instead of trial by judge  principles would be applicable in Hong Kong
The Hong Kong Law Society’s Position  The Chief Justice’s Working Party looked at the system from the top down. The Law Society looked at it from bottom up  The Woolf Reform is not a panacea to the costs and delay problems  Keep the existing rules Acknowledged that litigation in Hong Kong is costly and time consuming. That could be due to other reasons  Proposed that pleadings should be “enhanced”
 Positive and substantive grounds of defence should be put forward  The wide ambit of Peruvian Guano test should apply in discovery of documents  There are pros and cons with active case management by the court  Different judges making different and inconsistent decisions is even worse
The Intellectual Property Practitioner’s View Point  Need to be more efficient and less expensive  Generally, the reforms should be supported  The following proposals are useful - adoption of pre-action protocols - favours specialisation
- pleadings to be verified - offer for settlement at any stage - case management, time tabling and milestones - Special List - limited discovery  Compulsory mediation may not be practical for counterfeiters  In other infringement cases, mediation may be useful where IP specialist are available
 Summary assessment of costs may be adopted providedit does not replace a detailed cost analysis in appropriate cases  Court should have control on the scope and use of expert evidence  A Code of Conduct for expert witnesses should be introduced  Welcome solicitors and barristers (i) to disclose to their clients basis of their charges (ii) to provide best estimates
 A new set of rules rather than piecemeal amendments  Essential to have -adequate judicial and court resources -training programmes to familiarise judges and other court staff with reforms, development of computerised system to perform case-flow management, resource allocation and management statistic function
The Working Party is to provide their final report by the end of this year