1 / 14

Seminar on Territorial Cohesion: Policy Intervention at Different Scales

This seminar explores the challenges and strategies for spatial planning in Germany, focusing on territorial cohesion and evidence-based planning. It discusses the role of metropolitan regions and the need for alliances for growth and joint responsibility. The seminar also highlights the concept of functional regions and the importance of urban-rural partnerships.

nixonr
Download Presentation

Seminar on Territorial Cohesion: Policy Intervention at Different Scales

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Manfred SinzBundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und StadtentwicklungFederal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs Seminar “Territorial Cohesion: what scale of policy intervention?” Brussels, TCUM 12 March 2010 Neo Rauch: Landschaft mit Sendeturm 1996 Strategies for Spatial Development in Germany -An Approach Based on Functional Regions

  2. Content • Change of Reality: Challenges for Spatial Planning • New “Leitbilder”: Evidence-based Planning • Metropolitan Regions: Alliances for Growth and Joint Responsibility

  3. Change of Reality:Challenges for Spatial Planning • Globalization and European integration • Bigger markets: more competition • “Metropolization”: concentration of economic potentials, expansion of functional regions: greater areas of influence as empirical evidence • Question for the planning system: adaptation or opposition? • Answer: evidence-based planning

  4. Hamburg Randstad London Berlin Rhein-Ruhr Frankfurt Paris Lux. Stuttgart Wien Strasb. München Basel Zürich Genf Mailand Multi-indicator accessibility model of metropolitan potentials. Independent from administrative borders. Nürnberg Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (2009) Rom

  5. Traditional Concept of Central Places

  6. Growth and Innovation: The Concept of Metropolitan Regions Metropolitan Cores and Important Cities Metropolitan Regions Areas of Influence „New“ Boundaries Rural Growth Centres Regions to be stabilized New Spatial Planning Concept for Germany 2006

  7. Strategic Elements of the Concept for Growth and Innovation • Regional Governance and European Competitiveness: “European Metropolitan Region” as a Brand and as an Issue of European Spatial Development Policy • Metropolitan Regions as Alliances for Growth and Joint Responsibility: Synergy and Solidarity across Borders and Jurisdictions • Strengthening Metro Functions: International Gateways and Connections, Nodes and Networks of the Knowledge Society, Culture and Ability for Social Integration, Quality Places • Coping with Metro Deficits: Traffic Congestion, Pollution, Social Handicaps and Disadvantaged Neighborhoods, Lagging Financial Resources

  8. Fostering Urban-RuralPartnership • General concept as consensus between federal government and “Länder” governments responsible for spatial planning (top down) • Organization and territorial definition of territories and alliances as self binding discourse at the regional and communal level (bottom up) • Functional Metropolitan Regions transgressing administrative limits of “Länder” (states) and municipalities with variable territorial geometries • No new institutional level; not based on new legal or financial instruments • Strong role of communities, private companies and civic society (stakeholder networks) • Transferring the concept to other regional levels (Regiopoles) and to cross-border metropolitan regions (i.e. ESPON/Metroborder)

  9. Two examples: Nuremberg and Rhine-Neckar

  10. Leitbild (Detail) metropolregionnürnberg Hof Coburg Bayreuth Bamberg 50 km Radius Würzburg Amberg Nürnberg About Nuremberg Metropolitan Region:With approximately 3.5 million inhabitants and 150.000 companies, the Nuremberg Metropolitan Region is a trendsetting centre of national and international importance for Europe. It is impetus for different developments concerning social, cultural, economic and technological aspects.

  11. Concept and Activities • Governing council of 54 rural district administrators, lord mayors and mayors acting on a voluntary basis, openness and dynamics, eye-to-eye dealings, subsidiarity and the principle of consensus without governmental pressure • Entrepreneurs, scientists, politicians and cultural managers prepare strategic decisions and projects for the council • Around 400 players from the entire region contribute to six specialised forums "Industry and Infrastructure", "Transport and Planning", "Science", "Culture and Sport", "Tourism" and "Marketing". The region's own marketing association develops and implements marketing for the metropolitan region • At present 11 projects are supported by committee financing. The activities range from a nation-wide advertising campaign, through presence at international trade fairs, to a metropolitan card with which the citizens of the metropolitan region can travel with bus and train.

  12. Frankfurt Rhein-Neckar Stuttgart 50 km Radius

  13. Thank You Neo Rauch Akademie im Wald 1998 Contact: manfred.sinz@bmvbs.bund.de

More Related