1 / 20

Psychotherapists’ handling of sexual attraction to clients: A grounded theory

Psychotherapists’ handling of sexual attraction to clients: A grounded theory. Dr Anthony Arcuri 1,2 and Dr Doris McIlwain 1 1 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

niveditha
Download Presentation

Psychotherapists’ handling of sexual attraction to clients: A grounded theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Psychotherapists’ handling of sexual attraction to clients: A grounded theory Dr Anthony Arcuri1,2and Dr Doris McIlwain1 1 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia 2 National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 13th International – 2nd World Conference of the Association of Psychology and Psychiatry for Adults and Children (A.P.P.A.C.) Athens, Hellas, 20 May to 23 May 2008

  2. Background • Decades of absence from psychotherapeutic discourse • In last 20 years, some progressive research: largely descriptive, sporadic, fragmented, primarily US-based • In particular, no theory • RQ: What is the process of psychotherapists’ handling of sexual attraction to clients?

  3. Method – Grounded Theory • A method where data is collected via interviews and analysed qualitatively • Generator of theory “where existing theory is inappropriate, too abstracted, or absent entirely” (Henwood & Pidgeon, 2003, p. 134). • Aim is to produce an innovative theory that is ‘grounded’ in data • Achieved via a two-way process between the researcher’s conceptualisations and the raw data

  4. The participants • Eleven psychologists who practice psychotherapy • Six men, five women • Mid-twenties to mid-sixties • One to 40 years’ experience • Varying theoretical orientations • Learning theory-based (CBT, DBT, ACT) • Psychodynamic – Narrative • Systemic family therapy – Humanistic • Interviewed about hypothetical experiences of sexual attraction to clients

  5. The theory Sexual attraction develops Appraisal of context  manageability Decision-making  ethics, consequences Actions Consequences Resolution; End therapy

  6. Development of sexual attraction to clients • Client – physical, personality, behaviour, similar in age to psychotherapist • Psychotherapist • Usual attraction to above qualities  mild experience • Unmet needs: intimacy, sexual fulfilment, excitement, validation of self-image; occasioned by relationship break-up, loneliness  more intense experience • Age: decrease of libido with age hinted at • Context of therapeutic relationship – intimate, emotionally intense

  7. Handling the sexual attraction – the psychotherapist’s characteristics • Combined personal and professional identities – values, morals, ethics, boundaries, beliefs • Maturational characteristics – psychotherapy experience, age, life experiences • Psychotherapy training history • Theoretical orientation • Relationship status • Gender

  8. Appraisal of the sexual attraction • Intensity – low to high • Interference with psychotherapy – minimal to great • Mutuality of the sexual attraction • The client’s characteristics – presenting problems, emotional stability, age • Timing – point during therapy at which it emerged • Reasons – self-origin, client/therapy-origin

  9. Perceived manageability • Self-efficacy and self-control • Less manageable contexts: • Highly intense, greatly interfering sexual attraction • Mutual sexual attraction • Especially vulnerable clients • Previous unsuccessful attempts at handling the sexual attraction

  10. Decision-making – Psychic and behavioural management • Acknowledgement and awareness • Repression and ignorance – perhaps more common among those less experienced • Allowing sexual thoughts – conflicting beliefs • Active strategies – self-analysis, self-talk, self-control/willpower, mindfulness • Passive strategies – compartmentalise, disregard, shut off the sexual attraction • Behavioural strategies

  11. Therapeutic use of the sexual attraction • When sexual attraction appraised as relevant to therapy • Use it to understand client’s needs and relational style; assist treatment planning • Mixed opinions regarding self-disclosure • Unethical across all contexts • Unethical only if: client emotionally unstable, immature; sexual attraction due mainly to therapist’s issues; disclosure raw, direct

  12. Self-disclosure of the sexual attraction • Might self-disclose if: • Confident • Received guidance about doing so • Sexual attraction appraised as having emerged via the process of the therapeutic relationship • Perceived as having therapeutic benefit • Direct disclosure – one participant • Indirect disclosure – concepts of transference, countertransference, intimacy, closeness, non-sexualised

  13. Guidance seeking • All believed important for difficult-to-manage sexual attraction • Despite this, many potential barriers: • Anxiety, shame, embarrassment, awkwardness • Same-sex attraction • Available source of guidance unsupportive, insensitive, incompetent, responsible for therapist’s future (trainee) • Past negative experiences of seeking guidance • Perceived as indicator of weakness, maladjustment • Trainee: “underdeveloped self-esteem” • Experienced therapist: maintaining reputation as “in control”

  14. Guidance seeking • Conditions conducive to seeking guidance: • Source of guidance: trustworthy, open-minded, competent; psychodynamic; initiates discussions about sexual issues; self-discloses own experiences • Psychotherapist commonly self-discloses to, has positive relationship with, source of guidance • Psychotherapist desires understanding • Sexual attraction interfering with psychotherapy, difficult to manage

  15. Privileging the sexual attraction • Some disclosed examples: • Special care of physical appearance • Discussing sexual attraction evocatively with others • Sexual fantasy • Some hypothetical examples discussed: • Special treatment of clients • Extended sessions • Manipulation to meet own needs • Socialising with the client • Sexual relationship/contact

  16. Discontinuation of psychotherapy • Where sexual attraction deemed unmanageable • Access to adequate referral networks • Decision in consultation with colleagues, client • How to tell client why referring them? • Genuine reason? • White lie?

  17. Implications • Raise awareness of sexual attraction issues among psychotherapists and the profession • Coverage of sexual attraction issues in psychotherapy training and ethics guidelines • Education: normalising; discussed in and outside of ethics classes; modelling of appropriate behaviour, disclosure; based on sound theory and evidence • Scholars of different theoretical orientations need to articulate their positions on sexual attraction issues • Supervisors: set conditions conducive to guidance seeking

  18. Limitations • Self-reported, mostly hypothetical data • Researcher influence on collection and interpretation of data • Gender • Pre-existing beliefs

  19. Future directions • Many questions remain unanswered • Exploration of actual experiences • Clarification of the role of gender in the process (via quantitative research) • Further examination of the role of intensity • Clients’ experiences • Momentum

  20. For further information or discussion, contact: Anthony Arcuri a.arcuri@unsw.edu.au

More Related