1 / 47

Estimating Uncertainty in Ecosystem Budgets

Estimating Uncertainty in Ecosystem Budgets. Ruth Yanai, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse Ed Rastetter, Ecosystems Center, MBL Dusty Wood, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse. Ecosystem Budgets have No Error. Hubbard Brook P Budget Yanai (1992) Biogeochemistry. Replicate Measurements.

nieve
Download Presentation

Estimating Uncertainty in Ecosystem Budgets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Estimating Uncertainty in Ecosystem Budgets Ruth Yanai, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse Ed Rastetter, Ecosystems Center, MBL Dusty Wood, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse

  2. Ecosystem Budgets have No Error Hubbard Brook P Budget Yanai (1992) Biogeochemistry

  3. Replicate Measurements

  4. Disparate measurements, all with errors?

  5. How can we estimate the uncertainty in ecosystem budget calculations from the uncertainty in the component measurements? Try it with biomass N in Hubbard Brook Watershed 6.

  6. When adding, the variance of the total (T) is the sum of the variances of the addends (x): For independent errors. If they’re correlated, use the sum of covariances. Mathematical Error Propagation

  7. Mathematical Error Propagation When adding, the variance of the total (T) is the sum of the variances of the addends (x): Biomass N content = wood N content + bark N content + branch N content + foliar N content + twig N content + root N content

  8. Mathematical Error Propagation When adding, the variance of the total (T) is the sum of the variances of the addends (x): Biomass N content = wood mass · wood N concentration + bark mass · bark N concentration + branch mass · branch N concentration + foliar mass · foliar N concentration + twig mass · twig N concentration + root mass · root N concentration

  9. Mathematical Error Propagation When multiplying, variance of the product is the product of the means times the sum of the variance of the factors:

  10. Mathematical Error Propagation When multiplying, variance of the product is the product of the means times the sum of the variance of the factors: wood mass · wood N concentration But • log (Mass) = a + b*log(PV) + error • And • PV = 1/2 r2 * Height • log(Height) = a + b*log(Diameter) + error

  11. Mathematical Error Propagation “The problem of confidence limits for treatment of forest samples by logarithmic regression is unsolved.” --Whittaker et al. (1974)

  12. Monte Carlo Simulation

  13. Monte Carlo Simulation Tree Height • log (Height) = a + b*log(Diameter) + error

  14. Monte Carlo Simulation Tissue Mass • log (Mass) = a + b*log(PV) + error • PV = 1/2 r2 * Height

  15. Monte Carlo Simulation Tissue Concentration • N concentration = constant + error

  16. Monte Carlo Simulation

  17. Monte Carlo Simulation Calculate the nutrient contents of wood, branches, twigs, leaves and roots, using species- and element-specific parameters, sampling these parameters with known error. After many iterations, analyze the variance of the results.

  18. A Monte-Carlo approach could be implemented using specialized software or almost any programming language. This illustration uses a spreadsheet model.

  19. Lookup Lookup Lookup Height Parameters ***IMPORTANT*** Random selection of parameters values happens HERE, not separately for each tree • Height = 10^(a + b*log(Diameter) + log(E))

  20. Biomass Parameters Lookup Lookup Lookup • Biomass = 10^(a + b*log(PV) + log(E)) • PV = 1/2 r2 * Height

  21. Biomass Parameters Lookup Lookup Lookup • Biomass = 10^(a + b*log(PV) + log(E)) • PV = 1/2 r2 * Height

  22. Biomass Parameters Lookup Lookup Lookup • Biomass = 10^(a + b*log(PV) + log(E)) • PV = 1/2 r2 * Height

  23. Concentration Parameters Lookup Lookup • Concentration = constant + error

  24. COPY THIS ROW-->

  25. Paste Values button After enough interations, analyze your results

  26. Repeated Calculations of N in Biomass Hubbard Brook Watershed 6 How many iterations is enough?

  27. Repeated Calculations of N in Biomass Hubbard Brook Watershed 6 Two different sets of 250 iterations: Mean settles down over many iterations

  28. Repeated Calculations of N in Biomass Hubbard Brook Watershed 6 Uncertainty in Biomass N: 110 kg/ha Coefficient of Variation: 18%

  29. Hubbard Brook W6 is surveyed in 208 25m x 25m plots. How much variation is there from one part of this watershed to another? This is a more common way to represent uncertainty in budgets. Approaches to Estimating Uncertainty: Replicate Measurements

  30. Replicate Samples Variation across plots: 16 Mg/ha, or 5%

  31. Replicate Samples Variance across plots: 30 Mg/ha, or 10% with smaller plots

  32. Which is More Uncertain? Parameter uncertainty doesn’t affect comparisons across space. But it matters when you take your number and go.

  33. The Value of Ecosystem Error • Quantify uncertainty in our results

  34. The N budget for Hubbard Brook published in 1977 was “missing” 14.2 kg/ha/yr Borrmann et al. (1977) Science

  35. Net N fixation (14.2 kg/ha/yr) = • hydrologic export • + N accretion in the forest floor • + N accretion in mineral soil • + N accretion in living biomass • precipitation N input • weathering N input • change in soil N stores

  36. We can’t detect a difference of 1000 kg N/ha in the mineral soil…

  37. The Value of Ecosystem Error • Quantify uncertainty in our results Identify ways to reduce uncertainty

  38. Better than the sensitivity estimates that vary everything by the same amount--they don’t all vary by the same amount! “What is the greatest source of uncertainty in my answer?”

  39. “What is the greatest source of uncertainty to my answer?” Better than the uncertainty in the parameter estimates--we can tolerate a large uncertainty in an unimportant parameter.

  40. Other Considerations Independence of error (covariance) Distribution of errors (normal or not)

  41. Additional Sources of Error Bias in measurements Errors of omission Conceptual errors Measurement errors Spatial and temporal variation

  42. The Value of Ecosystem Error • Quantify uncertainty in our results Identify ways to reduce uncertainty Advice • One way or another, find a way to calculate ecosystem errors, and report them. • This is not possible unless researchers also report error with parameters.

More Related