1 / 29

Lai Swee Choo Patricia Goh Deline Victoria Soh

A Study of Achievement Goals in a Single Sex Independent School: Student interest, Learning Strategies and Performance. Lai Swee Choo Patricia Goh Deline Victoria Soh. Why Motivation?. Students: Learn more from a motivated activity They retain that learning better

nhu
Download Presentation

Lai Swee Choo Patricia Goh Deline Victoria Soh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Study of Achievement Goals in a Single Sex Independent School: Student interest, Learning Strategies and Performance Lai Swee Choo Patricia Goh Deline Victoria Soh

  2. Why Motivation? • Students: • Learn more from a motivated activity • They retain that learning better • Are involved in their own learning and development • Exhibit behavioral characteristics such as persistence, and are more ready to meet challenges in life when they leave school

  3. Why Achievement Motivation? • Achievement Motivation: • Achievement motivation is seen as the driving force that directs an individual towards a goal and the reason for engaging in a task is related to an individual’s goal orientations . • Elliot (1999) • It affects what happens in the classroom because it influences how students approach tasks, how they interpret and evaluate achievement-related information, and how they set goals and effort expenditure for tasks. • Seegers, Putten & Brabander (2002)

  4. Literature Review • Taiwanese students’ motivation, cognitive engagement, and grades were positively associated with mastery goals. • Performance-approach goals were adaptive in terms of children's use of cognitive strategies and their grades. • Performance-avoidance goals were related to students' maladaptive motivation. • Shih (2005)

  5. Literature Review • Singaporean students who scored high on mastery goal orientations were likely to score high on deep processing such as critical thinking and self-regulation. • Lam (2008) • Another study documented that Singaporean students who scored high on mastery goal orientation were likely to score high on adaptive learning strategies such as critical thinking and self-regulation. • Jang (2008)

  6. Literature Review • In another study in an autonomous school, mastery goals were related to interest. • Critical thinking and self regulation positively related to Mathematics results. • Goh (2010)

  7. Achievement Goal Theory

  8. Theoretical Background • A mastery goal orientation is defined in terms of a focus on learning, mastering the task according to self-set standards or self-improvement, developing new skills, improving to developing competence. • A performance goal orientation represents a focus on demonstrating competence or ability and how ability will be judged relative to others. • Elliott and Dweck(1988)

  9. Theoretical Background • Mastery goals will promote mastery-orientated response to obstacles • strategy formulation, positive affect, and sustained performance. • Performance goals will render an individual vulnerable to helpless response in the face of failure, low ability attributions, negative affect, and impaired performance.

  10. Theoretical Background • Mastery approach: to be more skillful in the task • Mastery avoidance: to avoid forgetting the task • Performance approach: to show that he/she is better than others • Performance avoidance: to avoid appearing dumb relative to others • Elliott and McGregor (2001)

  11. Theoretical Background • Pattern for mastery approach goals was found to be more positive than that for mastery avoidance goals. • Mastery avoidance goals more positive than that for performance approach and performance avoidance goals. • Elliot & McGregor (2001) • Zusho & Pintrich (2000)

  12. Purpose of Study • To examine students’ achievement goals, students’ learning strategies, interest and results. • To examine the predictors of students’ interest and results.

  13. Participants and Procedures • Participants • 158 Secondary Four Students • Procedures • One questionnaire with 66 items: • Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ) (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), • Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Pintrich, 1989) • Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (McAuley, Duncan, & Tammen, 1989). • 7 point scale (1 = Not true at all to 7 = very true) • Pearson correlations • Basic regression

  14. Internal Consistency (Alpha)

  15. Internal Consistency (Alpha)

  16. Internal Consistency (Alpha)

  17. Results & Discussions Achievement Goal • Mastery approach goal positively related to results

  18. Results and DiscussionsLearning Strategies • Positive correlation between learning strategies and results • Significant positive correlation between organisation & critical thinking • Significant positive correlation between organisation & self regulation

  19. Results and DiscussionsPredictors of Results • Mastery approach are significant predictors of results.

  20. Results and Discussions Predictors of Interest • Mastery approach are significant predictors of interest • Performance approach are significant predictors of interest.

  21. Implications for Teachers • Teachers should help students become aware of how to think, learn and reason within the particular discipline. • Pintrich (1995)

  22. Implications for Teachers • Teachers are encouraged to emphasize on mastery, personal improvement, and understanding in the classroom. • Research has demonstrated that when students perceive a strong mastery goal structure in the classroom, they are more likely to pursue personal mastery goals • Urdan & Midgley (2003)

  23. Implications for Teachers • TARGET Framework : • Task Design • Distribution of Authority • Recognition of Students • Grouping Arrangements • Evaluation Practices • Time allocation • Epstein (1988) & Ames (1992)

  24. Implications for Teachers

  25. Implications for Teachers • Encourage learning strategies such as organization, critical thinking and self regulation. • Organization • active effortful action and it includes clustering, outlining and selecting the main idea in reading passages. • Pintrich, McKeachie, & Smith (1989)

  26. Implications for Teachers • Critical Thinking: • The degree to which students report applying previous knowledge to new situations in order to solve problems. • Pintrich, McKeachie, & Smith (1989) • Teachers should teach students to question, to analyze and to look beyond the superficial for all possible answers • Carr (1988) • Four techniques of clarification. • Stating what you are saying explicitly and precisely. • Elaborating on your meanings, • Giving examples • Using analogies, metaphors, pictures, or diagrams to illustrate • Paul & Elder (2001)

  27. Implications for Teachers • Four Techniques of Clarification: • State what you are saying explicitly and precisely • Elaborate on the meanings • Give examples • Use analogies, metaphors, pictures, or diagrams to illustrate • Paul & Elder (2001)

  28. Implications for Teachers • Self regulation: • refers to the awareness, knowledge and control of cognition. • Pintrich, McKeachie, & Smith (1989) • Teachers should encourage goal setting and then teach students to revisit or self-monitor their progress towards their goal that they have set for themselves. • Goal setting and self-monitoring as cornerstones of self regulation. • Harris, Reid, and Graham (2004)

  29. ~ Thank you ~ Feel free to contact us at sweechoo@nygh.moe.edu.sg patricia_goh@ngeeannsec.edu.sg deline@nygh.moe.edu.sg End

More Related