490 likes | 503 Views
This presentation highlights the importance of collaboration in effectively using new materials. It discusses the evolution of designs, understanding material properties, and development of forming technologies. Examples of wood to metal and metal to plastic substitutions are provided. The presentation also explores the unique properties of polymers and the importance of accurate simulation results. It concludes with the collaborative approach and the involvement of various collaborators in the research process.
E N D
Collaborative Research Drives Technology Development Peter K. Kennedy & Rong Zheng Presented at iMUG05 in Orlando FL, October, 2006
It Takes Time to Use a New Material Effectively • People use their experiences with other materials initially • Substitution of old with new • In time designs evolve that use the intrinsic advantages of a material • Requires understanding of material properties • Development of forming technologies • Understanding of forming technologies • Examples • Wood to Metal • Metal to Plastic
Wood to Metal - Substitution • Iron Bridge 1779
Optimized Metal • Sydney Harbour Bridge 1932
Metal to Plastic - Substitution • Electric Drill • Note use of texture
Metal to Plastic • Evolved Design • Some special features
Metal to Plastic • Highly Evolved Design
It Takes Time to Use a New Material Effectively • In time designs evolve that use the intrinsic advantages of a material • Requirement • Understanding of material properties • Wood -> Metal -> Plastic • Characterization of properties • Development of forming technologies • Understanding of forming technologies • Simulation
Polymers – Relatively New Materials • Natural Polymers date back thousands of years • E.g. Rubber • Search for replacement of ivory • Billiard balls, pianos
Properties are temperature and time dependent Polymers can fail in different modes Processing determines properties Color wood and steel by painting Color polymers Create a different material Polymers – Very Different Materials
Why Are Polymers so Different? • Structure • Aspect ratio of 20,000 • Pasta • Processing determines properties
Getting Good Simulation Results • User Skill • Setting up of process/analysis conditions • Accuracy of geometry • Interpretation of results • Material Properties • Accuracy of Solution • Mesh • Mathematical models • Numerical methods
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and Temperature • Coefficient of expansion and modulus • pvT data • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
Our Approach • Moldflow • Modeling and implementation of models • Numerical methods • Implement best available models from academic/industrial collaborations • Rely on collaboration for some areas • Specialized measurement/equipment • Validation examples
Collaborators • SWIM, SCOOP, FISH (9 years) • ENSAM (France) (Shrinkage, morphology and properties) • Universite de Lyon (France) (Crystallization) • Universite de Nantes (France) (Thermal measurement and crystallization) • Solvay and Legrand (Belgium and France) • CRC Polymers (6 years) • Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO) (Synchrotron Studies of Crystallization and molecular orientation, Neutron scattering) • University of Sydney (Australia) (Crystallization, solidification and thermal conductivity) • Monash University (Australia) (Properties of polymers) • Technical University Eindhoven (Netherlands) • Fast cooling pvT data • Long term properties
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and Temperature • Coefficient of expansion and modulus • pvT data • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
Flow Analysis - Thermal Conductivity • Work by Venerus and Schieber et al. (IIT) • Anisotropic conductivity of PIB • Give melt a step shear of 8 in 75ms (shear rate ≈ 100s-1) • Measure diffusivity = • in shear direction • 20% increase • and normal to shear • 5% decrease
A Practical Example • Rough example • Gives • 17% increase in k in flow direction • 12% decrease in k transverse to flow
A Practical Example (Ctd.) • What about fiber filled material? • Glass is around 5 times as conductive • Random Case • kf =1.04 W/(K°m), km=0.2 W/(K°m) • Flowing Case • kf =1.04 W/(K°m)
A Practical Example (Ctd.) • Use Micromechanics to compute composite properties • Does it matter?
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and Temperature • Coefficient of expansion and modulus • pvT data • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
Flow Analysis - Viscosity • Amorphous Materials • No-flow is Tg • Viscosity goes up fast enough from Cross-WLF model • Semi crystalline • Viscosity does not go up fast enough • Use no-flow • Depends on cooling rate • Depends on flow
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and temperature • Coefficient of expansion and mechanical properties • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
Experimental Mold • ISO Plate size is 60mm x 60mm • Pressure transducer (4mm Ø) 47mm from gate (Kistler) • Restraints around edges • Delaunay et al. (Polym. Eng. Sci. 2000) 1.5mm (0.8mm) 3mm (1mm) 3mm Pressure transducer
Pressure Evolution • Pressure at node 178
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and temperature • Coefficient of expansion and mechanical properties • pvT data • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
Temperature Calculation • Moldflow has used average specific heat for decades • Ok for energy balance • Not for temperature at specific time • Introduce crystallization kinetics in energy equation
Temperature Evolution • Delaunay et al. used heat flux to determine temperature field through thickness in situ • Delaunay et al. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2000 • Between 10 and 15 seconds increase in temperature due to crystallization
Material Data for Simulation • Crystallization model as described • Viscosity function • Cross-WLF • Pressure dependant viscosity D3 = 2.0E-7. • Specific heat and conductivity • Delaunay et al. Polym Eng. Sci. 2000 • Density from pVT
Temperature Evolution • Calculated Result
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and temperature • Coefficient of expansion and mechanical properties • pvT Data • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
Coefficient of Expansion and Modulus • Most simple (analytic) models require an isotropic matrix • Rosen Hashin – Coefficient of expansion • Tandon – Weng – Mechanical properties • Not suitable • LCP • Highly oriented material? • Can overcome with numerical method • Anisotropic matrix • Anisotropic inclusion
Thermo-mechanical Models (Ctd.) • Glass fiber filled LCP • Constituent properties
Thermo-mechanical Models (Ctd • Carbon fiber filled LCP • Constituent properties
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and temperature • Coefficient of expansion and mechanical properties • pvT Data • Long time behavior • Structural analysis
pvT Data • Crystallization depends on cooling rate and temperature • Also depends on shear Tc = 140°C / without shear : Tc = 140°C / g. = 0.5 s-1 / ts = 10s : Koscher & Fulchiron Polymer 2002 Tc = 140°C / g. = 5 s-1 / ts = 10s :
Commercial pVT data is static No shear effects New machine High cooling rate Shear treatment van der Beek et. al. Inter. Polymer Processing, 20, 111-120, (2005). pvT Data
pvT Data – Affect of Cooling Rate • Decrease in density for fast cooling • Decrease in “no-flow” temperature van der Beek et. al. Inter. Polymer Processing, 20, 111-120, (2005).
pvT – Affect of Shear • Shear has little effect on final density • Increases “no-flow” temperature van der Beek et. al. Inter. Polymer Processing, 20, 111-120, (2005).
pvT – Affect of Shear • Calculated and experimental shear effects • Wi = 1, 10 and 50 are 1.8, 17.7 and 88.6 1/s respectively. • Material is not identical van der Beek et. al. Inter. Polymer Processing, 20, 111-120, (2005).
Properties of Immediate Interest • Flow Analysis • Thermal conductivity • Viscosity • No flow • Warpage • Pressure and temperature • Coefficient of expansion and mechanical properties • pvT Data • Long term behavior • Structural analysis
Prediction of Failure – Short and Long Term • Vital for efficient product design
Long Term Property Prediction • Intrinsic deformation of polymers From E. Klompen, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University Eindhoven, 2005.
Ageing and annealing increases yield stress Material can be rejuvenated mechanically Ageing and Mechanical Rejuvenation Meijer and Govaert, Prog. Polym. Sci. 30, 915-938, 2005.
Long Term Property Prediction • Can predict yield stress from cooling history of the molding Govaert et al. Intern. Polymer Processing 20, 2005.
Getting Good Simulation Results • User Skill • Setting up of process/analysis conditions • Accuracy of geometry • Interpretation of results • Material Properties • Accuracy of Solution • Mesh • Mathematical models • Numerical methods
Conclusion • Collaborators provide invaluable assistance to development • Experimental data • Specialized measurements and techniques • New models • Much of this work will be implemented in commercial software • A consortium for post molding shrinkage and warpage is starting this year
Thank you • To you • Our collaborators • ENSAM, Univ. Lyon, Univ. Nantes, Solvay, Legrand • Crystallization, pvT, experimental data, thermo-mechanical models • Tech Univ. Eindhoven • pvT, Long term properties • Univ Sydney, ANSTO, Monash Univ. • Properties and crystallization • Univ. Leeds