1 / 15

Shaping Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies Policy Issues and Quantitative Insights

Shaping Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies Policy Issues and Quantitative Insights Prepared for presentation at the International Conference on: ”Flexible Mechanisms for an Efficient Climate Policy” July 27-28, 1999 Stuttgart Christoph Böhringer

neron
Download Presentation

Shaping Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies Policy Issues and Quantitative Insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shaping Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies Policy Issues and Quantitative Insights Prepared for presentation at the International Conference on: ”Flexible Mechanisms for an Efficient Climate Policy” July 27-28, 1999 Stuttgart Christoph Böhringer Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim

  2. Guidelines for Climate Policy: Efficiency (positive) Equity (normative) Insights from Applied Economic Analysis for Decision Making: magnitude of cost distribution of cost for alternative policy strategies efficiency/equity trade off } 1 Policy Guidelines: Efficiency and Equity Motivation and Structure of Presentation

  3. Consensus: • Need for policy measures to control GHG concentrations • Disagreement: • Critical level of concentration and risks of climate change • Scope and the timing of emission reductions (risk aversion / willingness to pay) • Learn then Act (Wait and see) Act then learn • (USA) (EU) • Need for quantitative cost-benefit analysis 2 Issues: Buying Global Warming Insurance - Total Costs of Abatement Motivation and Structure of Presentation

  4. Marginal Marginal abatement abatement costs costs (MAC) mac (MAC) 2 A MAC 2 mac 1 C MAC * B MAC 1 Emission abatement Emission abatement by 1 by 2 Δ E/2 Δ E * Δ E * 1 2 Δ E ¹ Efficiency losses (MAC MAC ) 1 2 2 Issues:Alternative Policy Instruments - Cost Efficiency Motivation and Structure of Presentation

  5. Efficiency Conditions: • Spatial dimension: equalized MAC across sources (regions) • ==> where-flexibility • Temporal dimension: equalized MAC over time • ==> when-flexibility • Efficient policy instruments: • Emission taxes: price-based (abatement to be determined) • Emission permits: quantity based (emission price to be determined) • Role of revenue recycling: double dividend debate • Need for systematic quantitative cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative policy strategies 2 Issues:Alternative Policy Instruments - Cost Efficiency Motivation and Structure of Presentation

  6. Global Warming Global Problem Global Solution: • Need for cooperative approach which includes all major emitters • Cooperation depends on “fair” burden sharing • What does “fair” mean? - Variety of equity criteria • “Equity is so hopelessly subjective that it cannot be analyzed scientifically” (Young, 1994) • Need for quantitative estimates of the economic implications associated with alternative equity rules 2 Issues:Distribution of Costs - Burden Sharing Motivation and Structure of Presentation

  7. Appraisal of Quantitative Models for Climate Policy Analysis: • Operationalization of policy experiments • Consistent analysis of complex mechanism (feed-back, spill-overs) • Systematic sensitivity analysis (robustness test) 3 The Role of Quantitative Economic Analysis

  8. Quantified Emission Limits under the Kyoto Protocol: • No emission constraints for developing countries • Annex B countries keep emissions constant after 2010 • International emissions trading (TRD) versus no trade (NTR) 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Kyoto

  9. Impacts of Kyoto on Lifetime Consumption: 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Kyoto

  10. Significant international spill-over effects • Burden shifting from developed to developing countries via terms of trade • - “Income” effect • - “Substitution” effect • - “Fossil fuel market” effect • TRD reduces total adjustment costs - gains from trade are relatively small due to • limited low-cost abatement options • TRD needs not be beneficial for all countries (adverse terms of trade may • dominate gains from permit trade) 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Kyoto

  11. Beyond Kyoto: • Physical requirement ==> contraction of global emissions: • - Further more stringent constraints for the developed countries • - Inclusion of developing countries • „Moral“ requirement ==> convergence of per capita rights (egalitarian) • Contraction and Convergence: • 30% reduction in global emissions as compared to 1990 levels • Linear convergence of current per capita emission to equal per capita emission • rights in 2050 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Beyond Kyoto - Contraction and Convergence

  12. Per Capita Emission Rights under Contraction and Covergence: 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Beyond Kyoto - Contraction and Convergence

  13. Impacts of Contraction and Convergence on Lifetime Consumption: 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Beyond Kyoto - Contraction and Convergence

  14. Large efficiency gains from emissions trading (<== range in marginal • abatement costs between 0 and 1500 $US per ton of CO2 in 2050) • Trade in permits is beneficial to all countries • Where-flexibility (permit trading) as a no-regret strategy for all countries • Major developing areas improve economic welfare over BaU levels • Under trade Contraction and Convergence may be politically feasible 4 Applied Policy Analysis: Beyond Kyoto - Contraction and Convergence

  15. Key Determinants of Climate Policy: • Magnitude and distribution of adjustment costs • Insights from Applied Economic Analysis: • Flexible instruments provide substantial efficiency gains: • Buy a higher level of insurance for the same amount of money • Get the same level of climate insurance for significantly less money • Flexibility/Cost-efficiency relaxes the problem of burden sharing: • Feasibility of long-term sustainable strategies such as Contraction and Convergence 5 Summary and Conclusions

More Related