1 / 65

650 likes | 989 Views

LESSON 6: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT. Outline Supply Chain and Supply Chain Management Supply Chain Database and Planning Supply Chain Management and Competitive Advantage Investment in Supply Chain Transportation Problem. Supply Chain.

Download Presentation
## LESSON 6: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.
Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only.
Download presentation by click this link.
While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

**LESSON 6: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT**Outline • Supply Chain and Supply Chain Management • Supply Chain Database and Planning • Supply Chain Management and Competitive Advantage • Investment in Supply Chain • Transportation Problem**Supply Chain**• A supply chain represents all the stages at which value is added in producing and delivering a product or service from suppliers (and their suppliers) to customers (and their customers). • A conceptual view of the supply chain network is shown on the next slide. In practice, the supply chain network can be quite large and complex.**Supply Chain Management**• Supply chain management is the coordination of the following functions and activities along the supply chain: • Planning and managing of supply and demand • Acquiring material • Warehousing • Inventory control and distribution • Producing and scheduling the product or service • Delivery and customer service**Supply Chain Database and Planning**A supply chain database contains information on flow of items through the supply chain and cater to other planning decisions.**Supply Chain Management and Competitive Advantage**• Competitive advantage may be obtained with a total systems approach to managing flow of information, materials and services along the supply chain • Text p. 307 discusses how Wal-Mart obtained a competitive advantage and won market-share over K-Mart with an investment in information technology towards an efficient supply chain management.**Investment in Supply Chain**• For high profit margin (high tech products, innovative products) products, it’s important to create a responsive supply chain. The goals of investment are: • Reduce stockout • Reduce lead time along the supply chain**Investment in Supply Chain**• For low profit margin (staple products, functional products) products, it’s important to create an efficient supply chain. The goals of investment are: • Reduce cost • Increase resource utilization, minimize inventory, • select vendors on the basis of cost and quality, design products that can be produced depending on such vendors**Investment in Supply Chain**Functional Products Innovative Products Efficient Supply-Chain Match Mismatch Responsive Supply-Chain Mismatch Match**Transportation Problem**• The transportation problem minimizes the total shipping costs of transporting goods from m origins (each with a supply si) to n destinations (each with a demand dj), when the unit shipping cost from an origin, i, to a destination, j, is cij. • The network representation for a transportation problem with two sources and three destinations is given on the next slide.**Transportation Problem**1 • Network Representation d1 c11 1 s1 c12 c13 2 d2 c21 c22 2 s2 c23 3 d3 SOURCES DESTINATIONS**Transportation ProblemExample**The Riverside Disk Drive Corporation produces Ambassador drives for personal computers in two plants located in Waterloo and Toronto. Periodically, shipments are made from these production facilities to three warehouses located in Windsor, London, and Ottawa.**Transportation ProblemExample**Over the next month, the production quantities of the 80 GB drives are expected to be (in thousands of units) Plant Anticipated Production (000 units) Waterloo 70 Toronto 110 So, the total production = 70+110 = 180 (000 units)**Transportation ProblemExample**The amounts shipped to the three warehouses will be Warehouse Shipment Quantity (000 units) Windsor 35 London 55 Ottawa 90 So, the total shipment = 35+55+90 = 180 (000 units) = total production. As it is here, transportation problems generally require total production (supply) = total shipment (demand).In case of inequality a dummy plant or warehouse can be used.**Transportation ProblemExample**The unit costs for shipping 1,000 units from each plant to each warehouse is given below: Plant Windsor London Ottawa Waterloo 420 280 580 Toronto 990 640 820 Determine a pattern of shipping that minimizes total transportation cost.**Transportation ProblemExample: Network Representation**35 Windsor 420 70 280 Waterloo 580 55 London 990 640 110 Toronto 820 90 Ottawa SOURCES DESTINATIONS**Transportation Problem**A Greedy Heuristic • The transportation problem will be solved using a greedy heuristic and Excel Solver. • The heuristic is easy to use, but does not guarantee an optimal solution. The heuristic provides an intuition on the structure of the problem. • An optimal solution can be obtained by solving the problem as a linear programming problem. Excel Solver will be used to solve the linear programming problem.**Transportation Problem**A Greedy Heuristic • The greedy heuristic discussed here is an iterative approach. • In each iteration, a minimum unit cost transportation alternative is chosen and the maximum possible units is transported using that alternative. • Note that the maximum units to transport is actually minimum of production available and shipment required.**Transportation ProblemExample: Greedy Heuristic**Windsor London Ottawa 280 420 580 Waterloo 70 990 640 820 Toronto 110 90 55 35 The initial tableau shows all production volumes (70, 110), shipments required (90, 55, 35) and all unit costs (in boxes)**Transportation Problem**A Greedy Heuristic • Final solution and cost: • From Waterloo transport • 15 units to Windsor, cost = 15(420) = $6,300 • 55 units to London, cost = 55(280) = $15,400 • From Toronto transport • 75 units to Windsor, cost = 75(990) = $74,250 • 35 units to Ottawa, cost = 35(820) = $28,700 • Total cost =$124,650 • As you will see in the next few slides, linear programming technique provides a better solution with a cost of $113,100 when the problem is solved using Excel Solver.**Excel Solution**• Set up the spreadsheet as shown on the next slide. • The cells with question marks are the decision variables. Excel will find numbers to these cells. • The cells with numbers are input cells. • Blank cells B10, C10, D10, E8 and E9 are to be filled up by formula. Cell B10 will contain total amount shipped to Windsor as suggested by the Excel solution. So, the formula for this cell is =B8+B9. Similarly, C10 and D10 will contain total amount shipped to London and Ottawa respectively. Cells E8 and E9 will contain total amount shipped from Waterloo and Toronto respectively. All the formula of these cells are listed on Slide 27.**Excel Solution**Cell Formula E8 =SUM(B8:D8) E9 =SUM(B9:D9) B10 =SUM(B8:B9) C10 =SUM(C8:C9) D10 =SUM(D8:D9) B13 =SUMPRODUCT(B3:D4,B8:D9)**Excel Solution**• After the Excel spreadsheet is set up with input values, formula and blank cells (or, ? cells) for the decision variables, • click Tools, Solver. • complete the • Solver Parameter dialog box, • Add Constraint dialog box (to access this dialog box, click Add button) and • Solver Options dialog box (to access this dialog box, click Options button) as shown in the next three slides and • click Solve button.**Transportation Problem**A Greedy Heuristic • As shown on the next slide, the Excel solution and costs are as follows: • From Waterloo transport • 70 units to Windsor, cost = 70(420) = $29,400 • From Toronto transport • 20 units to Windsor, cost = 20(990) = $19,800 • 55 units to London, cost = 55(280) = $35,200 • 35 units to Ottawa, cost = 35(820) = $28,700 • Total cost =$113,100 • This solution is better than the $124,650 solution given by the heuristic.**READING AND EXERCISES**Lesson 6 Reading: • Section 6.1 pp. 305-312 (4th Ed.), pp. 294-303 (5th Ed.) Exercises: • 6.1 pp. 319-320 (4th Ed.), p. 310 (5th Ed.)**LESSON 7: VEHICLE SCHEDULING**Outline • Vehicle Scheduling Problem • Savings Matrix Method • Identify Distance Matrix • Identify Savings Matrix • Rank Savings • Assign Customers to Vehicles • Sequence Customers within Routes • Construction and Improvement Procedures • Example**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**• Goods and items are delivered from one city to another, one province to another and one country to another. In this lesson, we shall discuss a procedure used to deliver items by a fleet of vehicles. • Suppose that a company owns several trucks. The company needs to deliver items to various customers within the Windsor City. The manager takes a map of the city, plots all the customers on the map and finds that the customers are scattered over the entire Windsor area.**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**• The manager finds that two vehicles will provide a sufficient capacity for all orders. One vehicle will serve the East side and the other the West side. To find out if each vehicle will be able to finish all the deliveries before their due dates, the manager first needs a possible route of each vehicle. Different route provides a different speed limit and risk levels. The manager draws a fast and safe route for each vehicle and estimates delivery times. It turns out that a large number of customers would receive their orders late.**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**• The manager then repeats the process with three vehicles, one to the South side, one to the East side, and one to the West side. This plan appeared suitable to meet all the due dates. • Such problems may appear in case of e.g., an on-line grocery stores such as http://www.peapod.com. See the next slide for a picture of their website. The orders are taken 24 hours on-line. When the manager starts working in the morning, the manager has to decide number of vehicles and their routes.**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**• Assume that • There are orders from 5 different customers • There are 2 trucks each capable of carrying 200 units**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**• The manager must solve two sub-problems 1. Split the city into several smaller regions, each of which will be served by one vehicle. This can be done by considering a customer first, assigning the customer to a vehicle, and then assigning other nearby customers to the same vehicle. So, this sub-problem will be called assigning customers to vehicles. 2. Sequence customers served by the same vehicle.**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**• The objectives of the vehicle scheduling problem can be many. • Following are some examples: • Minimize number of vehicles required • Minimize total distance traveled • Minimize total travel time • Minimize cost • We shall consider the problem with the objective of minimizing total distance.**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**Assume that the customer locations and order sizes are as shown above. The locations are plotted on the next slide. X Coordinate Y Coordinate Order Size W 0 0 1 0 12 48 2 6 5 60 3 7 15 43 4 9 12 92 5 15 3 80**Vehicle Scheduling Problem**The customer locations shown on the previous slide are plotted above.**Savings Matrix Method**• Following are the steps of the Savings Matrix Method: • Identify distance matrix • Identify savings Matrix • Rank savings • Assign customers to vehicles • Sequence customers within routes**Identify Distance Matrix**• First, the Euclidean distances are computed. The formula and a sample computation is shown below. The other distances are computed similarly and shown on the next slide.**Identify Savings Matrix**• Instead of serving two different customers by two different vehicles, if a single vehicle is used to serve both the customers, then some traveling distance is saved. • Savings S(A,B) represents the savings in traveling distance obtained by assigning Customers A and B to the same vehicle instead of assigning them to two different vehicles. • The capacity constraint is not considered at the time of computation of savings. In other words, when computing savings, assume an infinite capacity of the vehicles.**Identify Savings Matrix**• The savings are computed for all pairs of customers using the data from the distance matrix. The formula and a sample computation is shown below. The other savings are computed similarly and shown on the next slide.**Rank Savings**• The next step is to rank the savings.The idea is to merge those two customers to the same vehicle, whose merging gives the highest savings. • The savings are ranked from high to low. • From the savings matrix shown on the previous slide, the highest savings of 27.9 is obtained by merging Customers 3 and 4 to the same vehicle. • Next highest savings of 20.9 is obtained by merging Customers 1 and 3 to the same vehicle. • Similarly the other savings are ranked and shown on the next slide.**Assign Customers to Vehicles**Next, merge the customers. The pair giving the highest savings is merged first if the capacity is available.**Assign Customers to Vehicles**To merge the lowest ranked pair (3,4), the capacity required = 43+92= 135 < 200 = capacity available. So, merge 3 and 4.

More Related