html5-img
1 / 27

E-PRTR vs. UWWTD Eurostat JQ - IW vs. UWWTD Data Streamlining

E-PRTR vs. UWWTD Eurostat JQ - IW vs. UWWTD Data Streamlining. Hana Prchalová Petra Ronen Miroslav Fanta CENIA. 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA. Content of the Presentation. E-PRTR vs. UWWTD

neron
Download Presentation

E-PRTR vs. UWWTD Eurostat JQ - IW vs. UWWTD Data Streamlining

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. E-PRTR vs. UWWTDEurostat JQ - IW vs. UWWTDData Streamlining Hana Prchalová Petra Ronen Miroslav Fanta CENIA 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  2. Content of the Presentation E-PRTR vs. UWWTD - E-PRTR basic data structure and content - UWWTD basic data structure and content - E-PRTR vs. UWWTD – Main inconsistencies conformity, comparison Methodology of comparison Results of comparison Recomendations 2) Eurostat JQ - IW vs. UWWTD - Eurosatat JQ – overview, main tables - UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ - Conclusions 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  3. Discharges of treated or non-treated water to surface water body – effluents of urban waste water treatment plants and industrial discharges; activities and emissions are reported above min. treshold value only E-PRTR – basic data structure and content Organisation ID, Name, Address Facility ID, name, address, coordinates, RBD All data are provided per facility and year (exception – disaggregated data in case of disaster) Summarized discharge volume from the facility cca 80 polutants can be reported: Hazardous Substances Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus … 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  4. E-PRTR – basic data structure and content (2) Industrial facilities repoted without limitation Minimum urban waste water facility capacity: 100 000 p.e. (smaller UWWTPs should not be reported) Reported discharges: calculated / measured / estimated Values exceeding minimum treshold are reported only: Total Nitrogen 50 000 kg / year Total Phosphorus 5 000 kg / year 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  5. UWWTD – basic data structure and content Treatment plant ID, name, coordinates, Link to agglomeration, discharge points, receiving areas Detailed information about treatment plant technology and technical equipment are provided: type of collecting system level and type of treatment: primary, secondary treatment N-removal, P-removal, UV, chlorination, ozonation, sand filtration, micro filtration … 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  6. UWWTD – basic data structure and content (2) Load entering (p.e.), Treatment plant capacity (p.e) Treatment performance for: BOD5, COD, Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, … Incomming loads, discharged loads: Measured / calculated / estimated for each of main substances: BOD5, COD, Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, … Treatment plants linked to the agglomerations > 2000 p.e. reported only 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  7. E-PRTR vs. UWWTD data structure – main inconsistencies Different treatment plant IDs in E-PRTR and UWWTD size (capacity) of reported treatment plants (100 000 p.e vs. > 2 000 p.e.) all (mostly industrial) sources of waste water vs. urban waste water only cca 80 substances reported vs. main substances in detail only (BOD5, COD, Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus) – voluntary parameter in UWWTD reporting data exceeding treshold value reported only vs. no minimum treshold value used 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  8. E-PRTR vs. UWWTD data structure – conformity, comparison Selection of E-PRTR facilities with the main activity Urban waste water treatment plants Selection of UWWTPs from UWWTD with the load entering to plant or capacity of plant > 50 000 p.e. (E-PRTR facilities reported in many cases with capacity < 100 000 p.e.) Common determinands - Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus discharges can be compared only Limitation: miminum reporting treshold in E-PRTR voluntary parameter in UWWTD 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  9. Comparison of E-PRTR data with UWWTD reporting - methodology Spatial comparison (facilities with distance < 10 km) Comparison of names Comparison of discharges (if reported in UWWTD) 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  10. Comparison of E-PRTR data with UWWTD reporting - results E-PRTR data – 2007 2007 UWWTD reporting: 2006 data (9 countries) or 2005 data (16 countries) Results reported by ETC Water (Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen) on UWWTD (6.11.2009, Brussels) and E-PRTR (21.1.2010, Copenhagen) workshops: Maps and tables of common UWWTPs Number of common UWWTRs with similar load 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  11. 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  12. 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  13. 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  14. 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  15. Comparison of E-PRTR data with UWWTD reporting - recomendations Establish 1:1 relation between UWWTP (> 50 000 or > 100 000 p.e.) and E-PRTR facilities IDs in the most feasible reporting stream: - UWWTD reporting – add E-PRTR facility ID parameter (already provided by Slovenia in 2009 UWWTD dataset) - E-PRTR reporting – add UWWTD treatment plant ID Check the units of discharge in UWWTD reporting 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  16. Comparison of E-PRTR data with UWWTD reporting - recomendations Fill the information about entering load or capacity of plant and incoming + discharged loads of Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus in UWWTD reportning (voluntary -> mandatory parameters for 2011 UWWTD reporting ?? - has to be aggreed by MS if proposed) Check UWWTPs in E-PRTR without N or P discharges (below the minimum treshold value?) 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  17. Eurostat Joint Questionaire – Inland Waters Type of data: - mainly generated waste water (= waste waters before or without treatment) - discharges – only effluents of UWWTPs - total emissions per country - no tresholds (all emissions included) Examples of reported substances: BOD, COD, N, P, Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb, Zn Geographical coverage: 33 European countries + Turkey Period: 2006 (13 countries), 2007 (3 countries) 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  18. Eurostat JQ Tables 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  19. Objective: pre-filling of Eurostat JQ by UWWTD data Table 4: Population connected to wastewater treatment plants – no available data (parameter aggGenerated [p.e.] can not be used – population equivalent contains influence of industry, tourism and other activities recalculated to the „relevant“ number of inhabitants from the point of view of waste water amount; therefore, population equivalent can be very different from the number of inhabitants, especially in industrial areas) UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  20. Table 5: Treatment capacity of WWTPs - in terms of BOD5 – UWWTD: uwwCapacity [p.e.] -> can be recalculated Independent treatment (amount of waste water from each agglomeration, which is treated by IAS) – data partly available from UWWTD check identical definition of term „Independent treatment“ in JQ and „IAS“ (Individual Appropriate System) in UWWTD other (non-urban) WWTPs – no available data UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  21. Table6: Sewage sludge production and disposal – from UWWTP: unit [kg] UWWTD: uwwWasteWaterTreated [m3/year] – can not be recalculated to [kg] other (non-urban) WWTPs – no available data UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  22. Table7: BOD, COD: part of data*) available from UWWTD: uwwBODDischargedMeasured / Calculated / Estimated uwwCODDischargedMeasured / Calculated / Estimated or from WISE-SoE Emissions Total Phosphorus, Total Nitrogen: part of data*) available from UWWTD: uwwPDischargedMeasured / Calculated / Estimated uwwNDischargedMeasured / Calculated / Estimated or from WISE-SoE Emissions *) part of data = voluntary parameter in UWWTD, data not reported by all coutries and / or not for all treatment plants UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  23. Table7 (cont.): Volume: Water Quantity - only wastewater connected to urban wastewater collecting system from UWWTD uwwWasteWaterTreated [m3/year] check identical definition of term „Water Quantity“in JQ and „uwwWasteWaterTreated“in UWWTD Suspended Solids: no available data; Population equivalent: UWWTP data available from UWWTD: uwwLoadEnteringUWWTP [p.e.] uwwCapacity [p.e.] UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  24. Table7 (cont.): Heavy metals except Cr: Total data available from WISE-SoE Emissions; Cr: no available data. UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQ 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  25. Very limited utilization Different aggregatiom level in JQ and UWWTD JQ – whole country aggregation UWWTD – agglomerations / treatment plants above 2000 p.e reported only Harmonisation of terms needed check / confirm identical definition – e.g. „Indepentent Treatment“ Many usable parameters in UWWTD are voluntary only discharges of BOD, COD, N, P WISE-SoE reporting could be used as data source for JQ in certain cases - 13 coutries had reported Emissions in 2009 only - diverse amount of data UWWTD Data Possibility for Eurostat JQconclusions 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  26. Comparison E-PRTR with the new UWWTD database: scope similar as in2009; limited utilization Comparison new Eurostat JQ IW data with new UWWTD database: only effluents of UWWTD – total annual load per country Comparison new WISE-SoE Emissios data with new UWWTD database : scope similar as 2009 ETC Water – planned work in 2010 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

  27. Thank you for your attention 1. - 2. 2. 2010 WISE TG Meeting Stockholm Hana Prchalová, Petra Ronen, Miroslav Fanta CENIA

More Related