1 / 34

What is parametrization? Processes, importance and impact. Testing, validation, diagnostics

Introduction to Parametrization of Sub-grid Processes Anton Beljaars (anton.beljaars@ecmwf.int room 129). What is parametrization? Processes, importance and impact. Testing, validation, diagnostics Parametrization development strategy. Why parametrization.

nerina
Download Presentation

What is parametrization? Processes, importance and impact. Testing, validation, diagnostics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Parametrization of Sub-grid Processes Anton Beljaars(anton.beljaars@ecmwf.int room 129) • What is parametrization? • Processes, importance and impact. • Testing, validation, diagnostics • Parametrization development strategy Introduction to parametrization

  2. Why parametrization • Small scale processes are not resolved by large scale models, because they are sub-grid. • The effect of the sub-grid process on the large scale can only be represented statistically. • The procedure of expressing the effect of sub-grid process is called parametrization. Introduction to parametrization

  3. What is parametrization and why is it needed • The standard Reynolds decomposition and averaging, leads to co-variances that need “closure” or “parametrization” • Radiation absorbed, scattered and emitted by molecules, aerosols and cloud droplets play an important role in the atmosphere and need parametrization. • Cloud microphysical processes need “parametrization” • Parametrization schemes express the effect of sub-grid processes in resolved variables. • Model variables are U,V,T,q, (l,a) Introduction to parametrization

  4. Reynolds decomposition e.g. equation for potential temperature: advection source molecular diffusion Reynolds decomposition: Averaged (e.g. over grid box): : source term (e.g. radiation absorption/emission or condensation) : subgrid (Reynolds) transport term (e.g. due to turbulence, convection) Introduction to parametrization

  5. Space and time scales Introduction to parametrization

  6. Space and time scales 100 hours 1 hour 0.01 hour Introduction to parametrization

  7. Numerical models of the atmosphere Hor. scales Vert. Scales time range • Climate models 200 km 500 m 100 years • Global weather prediction 15 km 200 m 10 days • Limited area weather pred. 5 km 200 m 2 days • Cloud resolving models 500 m 500 m 1 day • Large eddy models 50 m 50 m 5 hours Different models need different level of parametrization Introduction to parametrization

  8. Parametrized processes in the ECMWF model Introduction to parametrization

  9. Applications and requirements • Applications of the ECMWF model • Data assimilation T1279L91-outer and T95/T159/T255-inner loops: 12-hour 4DVAR. • Medium range forecasts at T1279/L91 (16 km): 10 days from 00 and 12 UTC. • Ensemble prediction system at T639L62 (32 km) for 10 days, and T319 (65 km) up to day 15; 2x(50+1) members. • Short range at T1279L91 (15 km): 3 days, 4 times per day for LAMs. • Seasonal forecasting at T255L91(80 km): 200 days ensembles coupled to ocean model. • Monthly forecasts (ocean coupled) at T319L62: Twice a week, 50+1 members. • Fully coupled ocean wave model. • Interim reanalysis (1979-current) is ongoing (T255L60, 4DVAR). • Basic requirements • Accommodate different applications. • Parametrization needs to work over a wide range of spatial resolutions. • Time steps are long (from 10 to 60 minutes); Numerics needs to be efficient and robust. • Interactions between processes are important and should be considered in the design of the schemes. Introduction to parametrization

  10. Importance of physical processes • General • Tendencies from sub-grid processes are substantial and contribute to the evolution of the atmosphere even in the short range. • Diabatic processes drive the general circulation. • Synoptic development • Diabatic heating and friction influence synoptic development. • Weather parameters • Diurnal cycle • Clouds, precipitation, fog • Wind, gusts • T and q at 2m level. • Data assimilation • Forward operators are needed for observations. Introduction to parametrization

  11. Global energy and moisture budgets Energy Moisture 5 mm/day =P-E Hartman, 1994. Academic Press. Fig 6.1 and 5.2 Introduction to parametrization

  12. Sensitivity of cyclo-genesis to surface drag control Pcentre=918 hPa Pcentre=923 hPa analysis Pcentre=925 hPa difference Introduction to parametrization

  13. T-Tendencies Introduction to parametrization

  14. T-tendencies Introduction to parametrization

  15. T-Tendencies Introduction to parametrization

  16. T-Tendencies Introduction to parametrization

  17. T-tendencies Introduction to parametrization

  18. T-Tendencies Imbalance (physics – dynamics) due to: (a) Fast adjustment to initial state (“data assimilation problem”); (b) Parametrization deficiencies Introduction to parametrization

  19. Validation and diagnostics • Compare with analysis • daily verification • systematic errors e.g. from monthly averages • Compare with operational data • SYNOP’s • radio sondes • satellite • Climatological data • CERES, ISCCP • ocean fluxes • Field experiments • TOGA/COARE, PYREX, ARM, FIFE, ... Introduction to parametrization

  20. Day-5, T850 errors Viterbo and Betts, 1999. JGR, 104D, 27,803-27,810 Introduction to parametrization

  21. History of 2m T-errors over Europe in the ECMWF model (step60/72) Standard deviation Mean error Increased turbulent diffusion + soil moisture freezing Reduced outer layer diffusion in stable situations New land surface scheme • Model temperature errors are influenced by many processes. • Observations at process level are needed to disentangle their effect Introduction to parametrization

  22. TSR: JJA 24 hour forecasts (CY31R1/23R4 - CERES) CY31R1 - CERES CY23R4 - CERES Introduction to parametrization

  23. Lat. Heat Flux-DJF (ERA_40_Step_0_6 vs. DaSilva climatology) ERA40 model Introduction to parametrization

  24. PYREX experiment Introduction to parametrization

  25. PYREX mountain drag (Oct/Nov 1990) Lott and Miller, 1995. QJRMS, 121, 1323-1348 Introduction to parametrization

  26. Latent heat flux: ERA-40 vs. IMET buoy Introduction to parametrization

  27. Cloud fraction (LITE/ECMWF model) Cross section over Pacific 45N/120E – 45S/160W (16-09-1994) Model LITE Introduction to parametrization

  28. Data assimilation – 1D-Var of cloud radar reflectivity • Observations • First guess 20070123 over Pacific • Observations: • CloudSat cloud • radar reflectivity • Analysis

  29. Parametrization development strategy -Invent empirical relations (e.g. based on theory, similarity arguments or physical insight) To find parameters use: • Theory (e.g. radiation) • Field data (e.g. GATE/TOGA/COARE for convection; PYREX for orographic drag; HAPEX/SEBEX/FLUXNET for land surface; Kansas for turbulence; ASTEX/Cloudsat for clouds; BOREAS for forest albedo) • Cloud resolving models (e.g. for clouds and convection) • Meso scale models (e.g. for subgrid orography) • Large eddy simulation (turbulence) • Test in stand alone or single column mode • Test in 3D mode with short range forecasts • Test in long integrations (model climate) • Consider interactions Introduction to parametrization

  30. Measure diffusion coefficients unstable stable Introduction to parametrization

  31. Convert to empirical function Diffusion coefficients based on Monin Obukhov similarity: MO-scheme (less diffusive) Operational CY30R2 MO-scheme (less diffusive) Operational CY30R2 Introduction to parametrization

  32. Column test Cabauw: July 1987, 3-day time series Observations versus model (T159, 12-36 hr forecasts) Introduction to parametrization

  33. Test in 3D model: Data assimilation + daily forecasts over 32 days March 2004 Effect of MO-stability functions Introduction to parametrization

  34. Concluding remark Enjoy the course and Don’t hesitate to ask questions Introduction to parametrization

More Related