1 / 57

Presented by Wayne E Thomas, CLU® Member Agent, The Nautilus Group A service of New York Life Insurance Company May 23,

Issues of Interest to Advisors Today. Presented by Wayne E Thomas, CLU® Member Agent, The Nautilus Group A service of New York Life Insurance Company May 23, 2012. Disclaimer.

Download Presentation

Presented by Wayne E Thomas, CLU® Member Agent, The Nautilus Group A service of New York Life Insurance Company May 23,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Issues of Interest to Advisors Today Presented by Wayne E Thomas, CLU® Member Agent, The Nautilus Group A service of New York Life Insurance Company May 23, 2012

  2. Disclaimer This seminar is for informational purposes only. Neither New York Life Insurance Company (NYLIC) nor its employees or agents are in the business of providing tax, legal or accounting advice, and none is intended nor should be inferred from the foregoing comments and observations. Everyone should be advised to seek the counsel of their own tax, accounting and legal advisors who must form their own independent opinions on these matters based upon their independent knowledge and research. Wayne E. Thomas, CLU® is an Agent of New York Life Insurance Company. Wayne E. Thomas, CLU® is a Member Agent of the Nautilus Group, a service of New York Life Insurance Company.

  3. The “Hidden” Assumptions “Once the policy is in force, I won’t have to look at it again.” • Life insurance – can’t get it and forget it • Long-term • Requires ongoing evaluation • Advisor may be asked for advice in managing • the life insurance results • Doesn’t have to be an expert. • Does have to know what to look for and where the problems areas lie.

  4. The “Hidden” Assumptions “Get along with the grantor and all is well.” • Trustee may think working for grantor but accountable to beneficiary “Interest rates will stay the same.” • Most policies placed more than 5-10 years ago designed to benefit from higher interest rate. • No action now, may require higher premiums later. • Will money be available? • Will gifting be available to transfer funds to trust?

  5. Longevity is the Key Word • When buying policy - longevity of the: • Insured • Policy • Life insurance provider • Responsible advisor must synchronize duration of insured, policy and provider • Looked at individually • Coordinated together • Assessed on a regular basis • How long does policy need to last?

  6. Longevity of a Person • Starting point – life expectancy • Expected number of years of life remaining at given age based upon average • Actual number of years remaining varies widely • Selecting the right policy – not insured’s life expectancy, but how long insured might live. Chances that a 65-year-old will live… Source: Annuity 2000 Basic Mortality Table; projected with Scale G.

  7. Advisor Checklist • Questions about the Insured • Do you know the insured’s life expectancy? • Do you know what the chances are of the insured living beyond his/her life expectancy? • Have you reviewed how long the policy is projected to stay in force? • If the policy ends, would your client qualify for new coverage?

  8. Longevity of a Policy • Life insurance intended to be in force at death • Policy purchased based on assumptions in force at that time • In real life, circumstances change, which may alter expected results • Advisor should continually measure performance by actual results

  9. Frequently Asked QuestionsAbout a Policy • How accurate are illustrations? • Illustrations based on assumptions • Actual experience may be different than illustrated projections • What would cause the policy to terminate before your client dies? • Type of policy • Assumptions used • What assumptions were made for the policy?

  10. Product Basics • Term Life • Whole Life • Universal Life

  11. Pricing Basics • Financial models built to develop and price products • Need to make assumptions about the future • Each product group has distinct assumptions and drivers of profitability

  12. Why Would Term Insurance End? • Policy designed to end after term of years • Premiums not affordable • Premiums not paid

  13. Why Might a Whole Life Insurance Policy End? • Premiums not paid • Whole life policies have non-forfeiture options • Default option varies by company • Reduced paid-up policy – reduced face amount • Extended term policy – same face amount for a period of years • Loans taken, interest due not paid, interest and loans exceed available cash value* * The cash value in a life insurance policy is accessed through policy loans, which accrue interest at the current rate, and withdrawals. Loans and withdrawals will decrease the cash surrender value and death benefit.

  14. Key Drivers of UL Pricing • Product design • Determination of policy charges • Policyholder behavior • Premium funding pattern • Lapse/surrender/loan • Mortality • Proper underwriting • Reinsurance • Interest crediting strategy • Portfolio vs. new money • Spread

  15. Key Drivers of UL Pricing - continued • Reserves • UL reserve requirements • Financing solutions • Cash Surrender Value • Expenses and Taxes • Required Capital • Company ratings matter • Higher rated companies = more supporting capital • Producer Compensation

  16. Post Pricing Hurdles • Filing & State approval process • Illustration certification • Illustrated scales must qualify as disciplined current scales (DCS) • Must break-even within certain period • Cannot be overly reliant upon surrenders • Prevents bait & switch • Non-guaranteed Elements (NGE) testing • Must declare method for changing in advance • Must demonstrate profitability is higher/lower than declared before NGE can be changed

  17. Why Might a Universal Life Insurance Policy End? • Two types of coverage • Guaranteed UL* • Non-guaranteed UL • Non-guaranteed UL • 3 elements • Premiums • Crediting Rate • Mortality charges • Policy no longer has enough cash value to pay monthly insurance charges. * All guarantees are subject to the claims paying ability of the issuing company

  18. Why Might a Universal Life Insurance Policy End? Premium Paid $ $ • Most policies originally designed to endure, but something changes: • Less premium paid • Lower crediting rate than expected • Higher expenses than expected $ % Rate Credited $ $ $ Monthly Expenses

  19. Advisor Checklist • Questions about the Policy • When was the last time the life policy was reviewed? • At current levels of interest, charges, and premium payments, how long will your client’s policy stay in force? • Have any premium payments been late, reduced, or missed? • Have any loans or cash withdrawals been taken?

  20. Advisor Checklist • Questions about the Policy – continued • For term insurance policies • Will the policy remain affordable as long as you need it? • Are there conversion privileges to a competitive permanent product? • Is your client’s policy subject to dramatic market fluctuations?

  21. Advisor Checklist • Questions about the Policy – continued • Will the death benefit be jeopardized or lost if cash is withdrawn or borrowed? • What guarantees are there that the policy will be around when the beneficiaries need it the most? • Is the policy subject to dramatic market fluctuations?

  22. Longevity of a Life Insurance Provider • Why are ratings important? • What if insurance provider’s rating are downgraded?

  23. Advisor Checklist • Questions about the Insurance Provider • Has the financial strength of the insurance company changed? • What is the current insurance provider’s rating/financial outlook? • Does the insurance provider have an adequate surplus of assets? • What is the investment policy for the provider’s general account assets?

  24. Life Insurance Financial Strength Ratings • If you do estate planning or individual income tax planning you have probably been asked to evaluate life insurance policies • Compare specific policies of different companies • Find best coverage for the money • But, the financial strength of the carrier may be equally important • Need to know that the company will be able to pay off future claims

  25. Overview • Why is financial strength a critical issue? • Current rating systems • Validity of the ratings • Company presentation of the ratings • How the ratings are determined • What happens when a company fails

  26. Importance of Financial Strength • More important for an insurance company than for other companies because of the very long-term obligations • For a 50-year-old insured, claims may be paid up to 40 to 50 years in the future • Should deal with a company having a conservative long-term perspective

  27. Possibility of Financial Impairment • Rare for large companies with a long history • Risk is much greater for smaller companies • At least 69 insurance companies taken over by state insurance departments since 1983* • In today’s environment, even some large companies not run properly (but with midpoint ratings) could experience financial impairment • Current recession might make financial impairment more common in the future *National Organization of Life and Health Guarantee Associations (NOHLGA) Website, Facts & Figures, Impairments & Insolvencies

  28. Possibility of Financial Impairment • Current recession might make financial impairment more common in the future • National Organization of Life and Health Guarantee Associations (NOHLGA) Website, Facts & Figures, Impairments & Insolvencies • A.M. Best Special Report, July 19, 2010, 1976-2009 Impairment Review.

  29. Rating Agencies • Four main life insurance company ratings agencies: • Moody’s • Fitch • Moody’s, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s are sometimes referred to as the “Big 3” Ratings Agencies • Better known for their bond ratings • Also rate sovereign debt • A.M. Best is the oldest and rates only insurance companies • Standard & Poor’s • A.M. Best

  30. Rating Scales • The rating scales are very different • The following slides show the scales for the four main rating agencies and an explanation of what the ratings mean • The ratings are sometimes divided into two categories—secure and insecure • The secure ratings on the first chart are shown in green and the insecure ratings in red

  31. Rating Scales

  32. Meaning of the Ratings (See pages 16-17 of the Special Section in Resource Guide for complete chart.)

  33. Comdex Ratings • Composite score for ratings of Moody’s, Fitch, Standard & Poor’s and A.M. Best • A company must have ratings from at least two of the rating agencies to receive a Comdex score • Companies rated on a scale of 1 to 100 in relation to other companies • The numbers reflect percentiles • A score of 90, for example, would mean the company scored higher than 90% of all companies rated • In this environment, recommend only buying from companies with the highest possible Comdex score

  34. How Good are the Ratings? • Criticisms • Conflict of interest because most rating agencies are paid by the companies they rate • Percentage of ratings paid for by insurance companies: • Moody’s………………………………100% • A.M. Best…………………………….100% • S&P…………………………………….82% • Fitch……………………………………44% • Too slow to spot negative trends and revise ratings • Particularly troubling is their recent failure to spot problems with mortgage backed securities.

  35. How Good are the Ratings? • Evidence • 2003 Federal Reserve study • Rating agencies more concerned with guarding reputation than pleasing clients • Only minor distortions in ratings • Ratings ordinarily reliable

  36. A.M. Best Study - Conclusions • Conclusions • Ratings correlate strongly with future financial impairment • Significant difference even between A++/A+ and A/A- ratings • Suggests that although a AA rating or 90 Comdex score is considered very good, an A++ rating or 95-100 Comdex score might be significantly better over a long period of time • Percentages increase rapidly over time • What would they be after 30 or 40 years? • Extremely important given the long-term nature of policy obligations

  37. Company Presentation of Ratings • Insurance companies and/or agents could selectively present ratings in their marketing materials • These ratings can be difficult to assess for several reasons • The scales are not directly comparable • Companies present their ratings in the most favorable manner possible • Ratings tend to minimize differences between the higher rating categories

  38. Differences in the Rating Scales • A given letter might mean something quite different in one scale than in another • B is “fair” for A.M. Best, but “weak” for Fitch • A+ is “superior” for A.M. Best, but only “strong” for Fitch and S&P • A letter might have a higher rank in one system than in another • For A.M. Best, A+ is the second highest rating • For Fitch or S&P, A+ is only the fifth highest rating

  39. Differences in the Rating Scales • The rating systems have different numbers of categories • Fitch, Moody’s and S&P all have 21, while A.M. Best has only 15 • A given rank on the A.M. Best scale may not be comparable to the same rank on one of the other scales

  40. Favorable Presentation • A company with ratings at or near the top from every rating agency would simply present all of the ratings • Companies with somewhat lower ratings might present only their better ratings, perhaps making the company look better than it really is

  41. Caution—What the Ratings Do Not Show • The ratings reflect expectations that a company will be able to make good on its future policy commitments. • They are not an evaluation of: • Any specific insurance product • Whether a company’s products provide good value for the money • Whether specific policy provisions are desirable

  42. How are the Ratings Determined? • The rating agencies have somewhat different methodologies, but the method used by A.M. Best, summarized below, is typical • Four factors considered: • Balance sheet strength • Recent operating performance (profitability) • Business profile • Information from meetings with management team on a company’s prospects

  43. Balance Sheet Strength • Three general factors— • Capitalization • Adequacy of loss reserves, asset valuation reserve (AVR) and surplus • Quality, diversification and liquidity of assets

  44. Capital Adequacy • Moody’s provides the following chart showing capital as a % of total assets for various ratings* • Aaa…………………….>12% • Aa……………………….8%- 12% • A…………………………6%- 8% • Baa……………………..4%- 6% • Ba………………………< 4% *Moody’s Global Rating Methodology for Life Insurers, 2006

  45. Quality of Assets • Moody’s provides the following chart showing the percentage of high risk assets held by companies with various ratings* • Aaa…………………….<10% • Aa………………………10% - 20% • A…………………………20% - 30% • Baa……………………..30% - 40% • Ba………………………>40% *Moody’s Global Rating Methodology for Life Insurers, 2006

  46. Diversification • Investment portfolio diversification • Spreading investment funds among a variety of assets and asset classes to: • Minimize risk for any given level of expected return, or • Maximize expected return for any given level of risk • Product and business line diversification • Diversify by insurance product and region • Possible diversification into related businesses like capital management • Highly rated companies are well diversified in both ways and have efficient investment portfolios

  47. Liquidity • Ability to meet policy obligations without selling long-term assets. • Most important measure is liquid assets as a percentage of policyholder reserves. • Other measures: • Quick liquidity ratio • Liquid assets/total liabilities • Current liquidity ratio • Total current assets/total liabilities

  48. Liquidity, Cont’d • Moody’s provides the following chart showing liquid assets as % of policyholder reserves for various rating categories* • Aaa…………………….>80% • Aa………………………60% - 80% • A…………………………40% - 60% • Baa……………………..20% - 40% • Ba………………………<20% * Moody’s Global Rating Methodology for Life Insurers, 2006

  49. Profitability • Profitability is an important part of a company’s ability to meet policy obligations • Basic measure = return on equity (ROE) • ROE = Net income/shareholder’s equity • For a stock company both earnings and capital appreciation are important • For a mutual company, earnings and surplus are the key indicators

More Related