1 / 42

Managerial Economics

Managerial Economics. Lecture One: Why economics matters to managers, marketers and accountants Neoclassical theory of profit maximisation. Admin. Purchase Reader Check subject outline Assessment: 3 parts Group presentation in tutorials 20% Essay on group presentation topic 40% Exam 40%

Download Presentation

Managerial Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Managerial Economics Lecture One: Why economics matters to managers, marketers and accountants Neoclassical theory of profit maximisation

  2. Admin • Purchase Reader • Check subject outline • Assessment: 3 parts • Group presentation in tutorials 20% • Essay on group presentation topic 40% • Exam 40% • My details • Steve Keen • 4620-3016 • 0425 248 089 in emergency • S.keen@uws.edu.au • Thursdays 1-3pm

  3. Economics as the context of business • Management, marketing & accounting focus on specifics • How to manage a company… • How to market a product… • How to quantify & compare corporate performance… • Focus is your personal input to business • Economics is the context of business • “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past” • Focus on constraints on and circumstances of your input • Both opportunities & dilemmas • Quick quiz: who made the above statement?

  4. Economics as the context of business in... The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon Karl Marx • Often the best wisdom in economics isn’t found in standard textbooks! • This subject takes a deeper look at economics you’ve already done (micro, macro); and • considers theories & data you haven’t seen before that are more relevant to business

  5. Economics as the context of business • A hierarchical view: starting from the bottom & working up • The firm • The market/industry • The economy • Finance • International business • A critical view • Conventional theories of above • Profit maximising behaviour, types of competition, Game theory, IS-LM, Efficient Markets, Comparative advantage • Different perspectives • Empirical data • Critiques of conventional theories • Alternative theories

  6. Economics as the context of business • What matters most to your firm’s success may lie outside it: • “For companies, a central message … is that many of a company’s competitive advantages lie outside the firm…” (Porter 1998: xxiii) • Understanding “what lies outside” may therefore be the most important thing you can do to be a successful executive • Economics as the study of “what lies outside” • Relationships with other firms • Interaction with the market • Market interaction with the macroeconomy • Macroeconomy’s interaction with global economy; AND… • Theories about the economy! Because:

  7. Economics as the context of business • Sometimes (not often enough!) theories explain how the real world works • Frequently (too often!) theories affect how people behave in the economy • Government follows economic advice • Firms/unions think about economy in terms of economic models • Government bodies (e.g. ACCC Australian Competition & Consumer Commission) apply economic theory in policies (e.g. competition policy, deregulation of telecommunications, etc.) • So you have to understand economic theory even if it’s wrong! • Which it frequently is…

  8. Economics as the context of business • Emphasis in this course is on realism • Theories presented; but also • Empirical data examined to see whether theories actually work • Frequent conclusion: they don’t (but sometimes they do…) • One consequence: can’t rely upon textbooks for this course! • Textbooks normally • present theory uncritically • only include “case studies” that confirm accepted theory • frequently based on invented rather than real data • Normally don’t go beyond microeconomics

  9. Economics as the context of business • This course • Starts with micro (theory of firm…) • Progresses through theory of the market, economy, finance to international trade • Based heavily on readings volume • You must have a copy • Tutorials and assessments based on contents

  10. “The firm”: real world vs economic theory • The real world: an incredible diversity • Size: from corner store to Microsoft • Operations: from one outlet to almost all countries • Diversity: • from single product (wheat farm) to many (Sony) • From one industry to many • Ownership: from sole proprietor to multinational listed company • Structure: • from one person operations to multi-department • From sole operations (production to sale) to specialisation in manufacturing, wholesale, retail, marketing, consulting…

  11. Economics of the firm: statistics • Firms in the Australian economy • Range in size from sole proprietor/employee to multi-employee institutions • From single product to diversified conglomerates • Over 610 thousand “entities” in 2000 (ABS 8140.0) • 3229 “large” entities employing 200 or more workers • 607,663 “other” employing less • “Average” employment 10.1 persons per firm • “Average” large firm employed 750 workers • “Average” other firm employed 6.5 workers • Legal multitude of businesses masks much smaller number of operating units: 15,870 units with 700,024 legal entities in 1998/99

  12. Economics of the firm: statistics • Concentration obvious (ABS 8140.0.55.001) • Top 20 units responsible for 13.9% of sales • 15,850 others responsible for remaining 86.1% of sales • Economic theory abstracts from this concentration & diversity • Claims firms share several essential common properties • Profit maximising behaviour • Under conditions of diminishing marginal productivity • Selling on “spot” market (no stocks) to anonymous buyers • Only interest buyers have is in getting lowest price • No interest in continuing relationship between buyer/seller; “arms length” transactions

  13. “The firm”: economic theory • The economic simplification: diversity ignored to focus on alleged essence of profit maximising behavior: • Basic model • single industry & product • one location • privately owned, sole proprietor • No internal structure considered • No specialisation: firm does everything from manufacturing to sales • Some generalisations allowed later (e.g., agency theory) • But basic theory abstracts from these details • Core model: profit maximising behaviour under conditions of diminishing marginal productivity

  14. Economic theory of the firm • Profit maximising behavior: • Seeking highest possible profit given constraints of • Falling price as quantity offered for sale rises • Rising costs as quantity offered for sale rises • Falling price as quantity offered for sale rises: • “Law of demand”: can only sell additional units if price is lowered • Mathematically: a negative relationship between price and quantity • To quantity sold must  price • Simple example: linear demand curve P(Q) = a –b Q

  15. Economic theory of the firm • Key consequence of “law of demand”: • Total revenue is price times quantity • Total revenue rises for a while as increase in Q more than outweighs decline in P • But ultimately fall in P overwhelms increase in Q: total revenue peaks and then falls… • Graphing price as a function of quantity:

  16. Economic theory of the firm • If firm produces 20,000 units, market price is 80 • Total revenue = 80 * 20,000 = $1.6 million Slope=0 Slope=40 20,000x80 • 40,000 units sold, price 60 • Total revenue = 60 * 40,000 = $2.4 million • Change in total revenue $0.8 m 40,000x60 60,000x40 • Change in unit revenue=$0.8 m/20,000=$40 • 60,000 units sold, price 40 • Total revenue $2.4 million • Change in revenue per unit zero

  17. Economic theory of the firm • Change in revenue called “marginal revenue” • “In the limit”, marginal revenue equals slope of total revenue curve: • Value of marginal revenue (x) equals slope of total revenue curve at same point (o) • Other side of profit equation is costs: • Fixed: costs incurred regardless of how many units produced (research, development, factory construction, rent, etc.) • Variable: costs that depend on level of output: wages, raw materials, intermediate goods, etc.)…

  18. Economic theory of the firm • Theory argues per unit costs rise as quantity offered for sale rises: • Slope of total cost curve is marginal cost: • Rises as output rises because of diminishing marginal productivity • After some point, each new worker hired (variable input) adds less to production than previous worker • With constant wage and diminishing output per worker, unit cost of output rises • “Please explain”…

  19. Economic theory of the firm • Rising marginal cost: the argument… • Production occurs in “the short run” • “Short run”: period in which at least one crucial input to production can’t be varied (normally machinery) • Therefore to increase output, more “variable factors” must be added to the fixed factors • Economic models normally consider just two factors: • Labour • “Capital”: grab-bag for all non-human inputs to production • Factory buildings • Machine tools • Electrical circuitry, computers • Raw materials and intermediate inputs (e.g., car stereo units for cars) • As you add more & more variable factors to fixed factors…

  20. Economic theory of the firm • There is some ideal worker:machine ratio (e.g., one worker per jackhammer) • In short run, firm has fixed number of jackhammers ? If this sounds weird to you, good! You’re on to something… • To dig holes, firm has to hire workers • 1st worker operates all six jackhammers at once: pretty inefficient! • Additional workers might show increasing productivity per worker for a while (two workers operating 3 jackhammers each less messy than one operating 6, ditto three workers operating two each…)

  21. Economic theory of the firm • Eventually ideal ratio reached (6 workers for 6 jackhammers) • Then to dig more holes, have to have more than one worker per jackhammer: ? ? • More holes can be dug with 2 workers per jackhammer than with one… • But productivity of two workers per jackhammer less than one worker per jackhammer… ? ?

  22. Economic theory of the firm • So productivity per worker might rise for a while; • But ultimately falls as more output can only be produced by adding more variable inputs (labour) to fixed input (capital) past ideal labour:capital ratio • Addition to output from each additional worker falls (but doesn’t become negative) • “Diminishing marginal productivity” (DMP) • DMP leads to rising marginal cost • Example: “Cobb-Douglas production function” Relative labor/capitalproduct coefficient Quantity produced No. workers Technology coefficient Amount of capital

  23. Economic theory of the firm • Cobb-Douglas production function allegedly fits aggregate economic data well (but see Shaikh, A. M., (1974). “Laws of Algebra and Laws of Production: The Humbug Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 61: 115-20) • Example with a=10, K=100, b=.4, L between 0 and 250: With 250 workers,output is 1,443 With 100 workers,output is 1,000 Change in ouputfrom next 250 is 443 Change in ouputfrom 1st 100 is 1000

  24. Economic theory of the firm • Each additional worker adds to output, but adds less than previous worker: diminishing marginal productivity • As usual, this is slope of total product curve: (maths unimportant, but here it is!): • Differentiate with respect to Labour… • Graphing marginal product:

  25. Economic theory of the firm • Output with 49 workers = 752 • Output with 50 workers = 758 • Marginal product of 50th worker  6 • Using formula, it’s exactly 6.063 • Output with 99 workers = 996 • Output with 100 workers = 1000 • Marginal product of 100th worker  4.012 • Using formula, it’s exactly 4 • Diminishing marginal product leads to rising marginal cost…

  26. Economic theory of the firm • First step is to “flip the axes”: graph labour input (on Y axis) needed to produce output (on X axis): • Just reads in reverse: • 1,000 units of output desired; • 100 workers needed • To get total (variable) cost, multiply Y axis by wage rate (say $12 an hour)…

  27. Economic theory of the firm • Rate of change of variable cost is marginal cost • Rising because of diminishing marginal productivity… • So firm trying to maximise profits is (according to economic theory) faced with • Falling price • Rising cost… • How to maximise profit? • Find biggest gap between revenue and cost • Production level of 1000 units has variable costs of $1200 • Marginal cost of 1000th units is about $3

  28. Economic theory of the firm • Graphically, it’s easy: (using earlier example) • But economists prefer to make it complicated by working in average & marginal revenue & cost • Converting diagrams to averages by dividing by quantity gives us:

  29. Economic theory of the firm • What it means: “maximise profit by finding the biggest gap between revenue and cost” • Gap between curves is biggest when tangents (marginal revenue & marginal cost) are parallel: • As economists like to show it: “maximise profit by equating marginal revenue and marginal cost”

  30. Economic theory of the firm • So it’s “really easy” to manage a firm: • Objective is to maximise profits • Procedure is • (1) Work out marginal cost • (2) Work out marginal revenue • (3) Choose output level that equates the two • For competitive firms, it’s even easier… • Competitive firms are “price takers” • Too small to affect market price/take price as “given” • Marginal revenue therefore equals price • (MR less than price for less competitive industries) • Profit maximisation rule is “produce output level at which marginal cost equals price”:

  31. Price Price Quantity quantity Economic theory of the firm • “Perfect competition” Downward sloping market demand curve Horizontal demand curve for single firm Marginal Cost Supply Pe Pe Demand Qe qe

  32. Economic theory of the firm • So the economic theory rules are: • If you’re a monopoly or oligopoly • Work out your marginal cost and marginal revenue • Produce the output level at which they are equal • If you’re in a competitive industry • Work out your marginal cost • Produce output level at which marginal cost equals price • If you’re in an industry with a small number of large firms • More complicated: game theory… • More on this later • As a typical text (Thomas & Maurice 2003, Managerial Economics, McGraw-Hill, Boston) summarises it:

  33. Economic theory of the firm • It’s a breeze for competitive industries (p. 450): • A bit more complicated for monopoly (p. 500): • And a real pain for oligopoly (p. 560)…

  34. Economic theory of the firm • What to do? So many choices… Reality check time! • How does theory stack up against reality?

  35. Economic facts of the firm • Theory makes many predictions; e.g. • Firms should have rising marginal costs • Competitive firms should have elastic demand curves: • Elasticity: how much demand changes for a change in price: • Value of E can be low (less than 1) for an industry, but in limit is infinity for competitive firms (horizontal demand curve…) • Relative prices should move frequently as supply & demand shift • Problem: not observed in reality • Relative prices seem stable • Money prices tend to move up, not down… • “Price stickiness”

  36. Economic facts of the firm • Dispute in economics over whether prices “sticky” or “flexible” • Ideological division in dispute • Neoclassicals/Free marketeers believe prices “flexible” • Prices adjust rapidly to changes in demand, supply Price • Economic problems caused by government, union, monopoly behavior that makes some prices (e.g. wages) more rigid than others Supply Pe Demand Quantity Qe

  37. Economic facts of the firm • Keynesians/Mixed economy supporters believe “sticky” • Prices adjust sluggishly • Key markets (e.g. labour) can’t be “cleared” (unemployment eliminated) simply by price movements • Can have underemployment for substantial time; government intervention needed for full employment • Ideological dispute continues, but statistical results imply “sluggish” price adjustments the rule • Theory implies rapid adjustments should occur • Why the difference? • Plenty of theories as to why prices are sticky; • Alan Blinder (in Readings) decided to ask firms “Why?” • Alan S. Blinder et al., (1998). Asking About Prices: a new approach to understanding price stickiness, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

  38. Economic facts of the firm • Enormous volume of theoretical research in economics • Huge amount of statistical (“econometric”) research too • Relatively little empirical research • Finding out what actually happens at firm/consumer level • Also asking firms why they do what they do • Frequency and rapidity of price changes etc. • How behavior compares to different theories of price stickiness

  39. Economic facts of the firm • Blinder’s procedure • Survey random sample of GDP so that results statistically applicable to whole US economy • 200 firms surveyed • Structured survey to ensure objectivity • Questions tailored to test economic theory • Key economists consulted on design of questions • Face to face interviews of top executives (25% President/CEO, 45% Vice President, 20% Manager) by Economics PhD students • Questionnaire taken seriously, informed answers • Interviewers could help clarify questions • Interviews took 45-70 minutes for 30 questions • Trial surveys undertaken prior to real thing to improve uniformity of presentation, interpretation

  40. Economic facts of the firm • Sample representative of private, for profit, unregulated, non-farm industry (71% of US GDP) • Reflects relative weight of industries in US GDP • Excluded companies with < $10 million in sales • Excluded group represents 25-50% of GDP • Weight of industries in which small firms common increased to compensate • Farms excluded because “no-one believes farm prices to be sticky” (60) • Perhaps price dynamics of farm sector different to manufacturing? • Random sample selected, of those approached 61% took part to yield 200 firms—high response rate

  41. Economic facts of the firm • Distribution of sample differs from GDP with respect to firm size: • But big firms overwhelmingly important component: • Average sales of firms surveyed $3.2 billion! • (even though 36% of surveyed firms had sales < $ 50 m) • 7 biggest firms had sales > $20 billion each & represented 58 per cent of total sales by sample • Firms surveyed represent 7.6% of US GDP • “we interviewed an astounding 10 to 15 per cent of the target population—a large fraction by any standard.” (68)

  42. Economic facts of the firm • Blinder’s survey serious coverage of US economy • Results give serious evaluation of economic theory • If survey results consistent with theory, theory a good guide to functioning of economy & to how managers should manage • If survey results inconsistent with theory, relevance of economic theory seriously jeopardised: could be irrelevant to functioning of economy (& how managers should manage) What do you think the results were? And the correct answer is... Write your answer down • Results contradict most of economic theory • Most sales to other businesses, not end consumers • Most sales to repeat customers, not “impersonal” • Marginal costs fall for most firms, not rise • Most firms face inelastic demand (E<1), not elastic • Fixed costs more important than variable costs

More Related