Information Services. The JCPSG case study UMSLG Summer Residential Meeting 7- 8 July 2005. TRAC and fEC. Why and What?. Principles. Publicly funded research should be fully funded by public funds
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Why and What?
The University of ReadingJCPSG good practice case study
Development of a methodology for the treatment of Information Services costs within the Transparency Review
Service UG PGT PGR Staff
Library:Library lending 1 1.6 1.4 0.7Use of e-sources 1 2.2 8.0 5.6
ITS:e-mails sent/received 1 3.9 6.2 18.8Web use 1 4.6 9.8 11.0e-mail server storage 1 2.1 5.9 8.6Home directory storage 1 2.6 12.7 9.2PC laboratory usage 1 1.7 1.1 0.2
Weighting for PC labs: - UG = 1 - allocated to teaching - PGT = 1.5 - allocated to teaching - PGR = 1 - allocated to research
andSchools weighted by HEFCE multiple
Comparison of existing & new modelsExisting New Teaching 64% 58% Research 25% 30% Other 11% 12%
Varies from School to School within Faculties