بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

1. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

2. Second Session

3. Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

4. Commitment for the review process TimeEffort Mission Activities* criteria * protocols Show courtesy Comments Judgment Confidentiality October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

5. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement * Establishing a sound evidence base * Agreeing Priorities * Team planning TRD * Keeping to schedule but also flexible October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

6. Building on the evidence base Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement * FAR * Initial commentaries * Identify gaps and requests * Observations and meetings * Formative judgments October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

7. Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement The reviewer tools Observing Questioning Listening October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

8. Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement Relation to the facilitator Meeting attendance Daily Academic staff Final oral feedback But, he will not attend - Students - Stakeholders - Final meeting of review team October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

9. Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement Relation to the facilitator Significance of meeting attendance • Clarification on matters addressed in or omitted Understanding of line of enquiries • Matters • context of the institution’s activities October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

10. Feedback on the initial commentaries * Use the handbook * FAR & any supple. information * Record apparent (+) & (-) and further enquiry (?) * Identify of gaps, apparent inconsistencies and requests * Sharing of information & request * Activities during site visit * Formative judgment each day October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

11. Formal judgements When ? Requirements ? Characteristics ? Pit falls ? October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

12. The Developmental Engagement Report Essential qualities of the report Structure (annex Q) Skills of effective reporting Production of the report October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

13. Essential Qualities of a report Report Should be Compliant Annex Q Evaluative Judgment C orrectlearoncise All the team Fair Balanced October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

14. The Structure of the Reportreference Part 4 paragraphs 55-56 and annex Q * Preface * Executive Summary * Main text comprising • Introduction • Evaluation • Conclusions * Conclude that the [institution] EITHER [is ready to receive an accreditation visit] OR [is not yet ready to receive an accreditation visit.] * The strength include. * Matters that should be addressed before an accreditation visit are: October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

15. The skills of effective reporting Notes Evidence Test & verify Team Discussions Annexes I & Q Use Formative judgment October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

16. Cont. The skills of effective reporting Evaluative frame work Comments & suggestions Over defensive Drafts Trivial details October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

17. Production of the report Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q Sharing formative judgments & draft paragraphs in the team Decision-making in the team Making judgments + & -- Conclusion either / or Prepare oral feedback script (annex J) October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

18. Cont. Production of the report Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q After the site visit Polishing written report Editing stage (ref. para. 56) Send draft 3 Institution Send draft 4 NQAAC Completion in 20w with milestones October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

19. How to conduct meetings? Situation Task Action Result October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

20. How to deal with the staff members? Self esteem Constructive Job related Arguments Provide evidence Credible judgment October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

21. Success of the review process depends on Review team NQAAC Facilitator Institution October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

22. Thank you October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

23. Discussion October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

24. Group Exercises At end of this session you will be able to: 1- Apply the structure of the report 2- Apply the written guidelines on judgements for the production of the Report contained in Part 4 and Annex Q 3- Draft a section of a report using early draft paragraphs 4- Make and write judgements that are supported by evidence 5- Identify matters that require further evidence before sound judgements can be made 6- Consider what has been learned about making and reporting judgments supported by evidence October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project

25. Using the site-visit schedulereference Part 4 paragraphs 45 to 51 and annex H Group Exercise Using the schedule of a site-visit, and the faculty annual report, identify from the prompts in annex I and the list of documentation in paragraph 49 the best source(s) of evidence for satisfying the points (questions or ?) you raised in your initial commentaries. From this, prepare a brief check list for the team’s first team meeting. October, 2006 National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project