1 / 9

SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative

National Science Foundation. Division of Science Resources Statistics. SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative. Lynda T. Carlson Division Director SBE Advisory Committee November 8, 2007 National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics (SRS) www.nsf.gov/statistics.

nbrister
Download Presentation

SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics SRS Data and the SciSIP Initiative Lynda T. Carlson Division Director SBE Advisory Committee November 8, 2007 National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics (SRS) www.nsf.gov/statistics

  2. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics With SciSIP funding SRS has underway significant improvement/Expansion Activities to enhance the comparability, scope and availability of data on the Science and Engineering enterprise. Why?

  3. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Industry R&D Context: Then and Now 1950s • Government largest source of R&D $$$ • Business largest basic research performer • Manufacturing • Large companies dominate R&D $$$ • Domestic focus • Focus on in-firm S&T resources (central research labs) 2000s • Business largest source of R&D $$$ • Academia largest basic research performer • Services • Large companies not as dominant • Global focus • Increased leveraging of S&T resources outside the firm

  4. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Academic R&D: Then and Now 1970s • Government largest source of R&D $$$; state government and institution own funds ~10% each • Research at the bench • Single discipline focus • Life sciences ~50%; physical sciences ~11%; social sciences ~8% • Individual PI research • Individual labs • Basic research and publications 2000s • Government still largest source; relative decline in state government; large growth in institution own funds (cost sharing) • Computer & IT assisted research • Increase in multi- and interdisciplinary research • Life sciences ~60%; physical sciences ~8%; social sciences ~4% • Increase in collaborative research • Growth in centers • Interest in commercialization (Bayh-Dole Act; patents; IP; technology transfer)

  5. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics S&E Higher Education: Then and Now 1970s • Disciplinary focus • U.S. a world leader in higher education • Students predominantly white and majority male • Predominantly U.S. citizen students and postdocs • Public and Private non-profit campus based degree programs 2000s • Greater interdisciplinary focus • Growth in higher education abroad • Greater racial/ethnic diversity and higher proportion of female students • Increase in foreign students and foreign postdocs • Growth of for-profit institutions and online programs

  6. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics S&E Workforce: Then and Now 1960s • Workers in S&E occupations a small proportion of total workforce • Individuals with S&E degrees and skills primarily work in S&E occupations • Individuals primarily work within a single discipline • S&E workforce predominantly U.S.-born/white/male • U.S. a leader in attracting S&E talent from all over the world • Mobility of S&E workers (across sectors, jobs, economies) is limited 2000s • Workers in S&E occupations larger proportion of total workforce • Those with S&E degrees and skills work in a wide variety of S&E and non-S&E occupations • Great increase in collaborative and multi-disciplinary work • Increase in proportion of foreign-born/minority/female workers • Greater competition from other countries in attracting S&E talent • S&E workers making frequent moves across sectors, jobs, economies

  7. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics • SRS Improvement/Expansion Activities and SciSIP • Some activities accelerated or expanded to support SciSIP: • - Redesigning the Industry R&D Survey • - Working with the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) to develop an • R&D satellite account • - Working to improve information about those in postdoctorate • positions • - Exploring approaches to gathering information on innovation • - Redesigning the Academic Research and Development Survey • - Adding a Field of Degree question to the American Community Survey • - Exploring issues and approaches for surveys of the federal sector R&D • - Exploring ways of collecting information about the interdisciplinary and collaborative nature of S&E jobs

  8. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics • SRS Improvement/Expansion Activities and SciSIP (cont’d) • Establishing ongoing Experts Panels in major topical areas: Industry, • Human Resources and Academic R&D • Exploring the feasibility of linking SRS data with other data sets to increase the relevance of SRS data for SciSIP issues • Exploring the feasibility of collecting SciSIP relevant information from non-profit institutions • Improving the usability, coverage and data quality of the Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates. • Holding many workshops with data users on specific S&E issues related to SRS data

  9. National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics • SRS International Data Improvement Efforts • Working with OECD/NESTI on the development of new S&T indicators • to better reflect the global knowledge economy • Working with U.S. PTO, OECD, European and Japanese Patent Offices and the World International Patent Office to build a high-value patents database • Working with OECD, UNESCO/UIS, and the EU/Eurostat to improve the quality of internationally comparable education, workforce and mobility data as well as continually improving R&D data • Participating in OECD/Chinese project to map the Innovation System of China

More Related