1 / 12

Civil Service

UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006. Civil Service. Kiev, 5-Jul-06. Julio Nabais SIGMA. Reforming CS - Why?. Condition of building a modern state To provide appropriate governance to society To support economic and social development.

nay
Download Presentation

Civil Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Civil Service Kiev, 5-Jul-06 Julio Nabais SIGMA

  2. Reforming CS - Why? • Condition of building a modern state • To provide appropriate governance to society • To support economic and social development Having a professional, independent and accountable CS as a condition for implementing other major reforms

  3. Main problematic areas… • Current LCS • Salary system • Training policy • Integrity system • HRM tools • Guidance capacity …leading to weak professionalism in CS

  4. Current LCS - problems • Adopted before the Constitution… • Several (non systematic) amendments (gaps, overlaps, fragmented) • Main areas of problems: • Scope: unclear • Rights and Duties, recruitment, promotion, performance appraisal, discipline: vagueness = arbitrariness • Remunerations – unbalanced • The Labour Code ruling part of the CS statute

  5. Scope Scope: unclear • Different legal acts, from different entities • Mixture of political and administrative positions • Lack of consistent criteria to define CS

  6. Rights & Duties, Recruitment, Promotion, Performance appraisal, Discipline • Vagueness of the regulation • Arbitrariness in implementation • Weak guarantees

  7. Remunerations • Non unitary system • Complex (scheme of bonuses) • Room for arbitrariness in defining individual salaries • Low salaries

  8. Training • Confusing roles (MCSD/NAPA) • Lack of consistent needs assessment • Priorities • Funding • Evaluation

  9. Integrity system • Ethics • Corruption • Incompatibilities • Conflicts of interest • Patronage

  10. HRM tools • Recruitment • Job descriptions • Performance appraisal • Discipline • Mobility • Promotion – professional development • Motivation mechanisms

  11. Guidance • At political level: • The President? • The Government? • The Verkhovna Rada? • At administrative level: • The positioning and the role of the MCSD

  12. Recommendations • Clarification of institutional responsibilities • Redesign the role and positioning of the MCSD • Adopt a new LCS • Reform the salary system • Review training policy

More Related