1 / 14

Review of Hirsch (1969)

Review of Hirsch (1969). What is a “pure” control theory? How is this different from other theories? What kind of control does the “social bond theory” emphasize? Why? What are the elements of the bond?. Social Support . This is Cullen’s pet theory—his article is in the end of your book

navid
Download Presentation

Review of Hirsch (1969)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review of Hirsch (1969) • What is a “pure” control theory? • How is this different from other theories? • What kind of control does the “social bond theory” emphasize? • Why? • What are the elements of the bond?

  2. Social Support • This is Cullen’s pet theory—his article is in the end of your book • Social Support Matters • As a “precondition” of informal control • As an alternative explanation of why “marriage” or “parental attachment” are important

  3. A General Theory of CrimeGottfredson and Hirschi (1990) “OOPS” -Travis Hirschi

  4. Another “Classic” • Start their theory with a statement of the “nature of crime” • Compare control vs. other theories (rehash of stuff we’ve discussed) • Attempt to explain the “stability” of antisocial behavior • “Heterotypic continuity”

  5. The Nature of Crime and Criminals Criminal Acts… Provide immediate gratification of desires Are risky/thrilling Are easy/simple Require little skill/planning Provide few/meager long term benefits Result in pain/discomfort to a victim Criminals are therefore… Impulsive Risk-taking Physical (as opposed to mental) Low verbal ability Short-sighted Insensitive

  6. Low Self-Control • The cluster of traits (impulsive, insensitive…) tend to come together in people • They are present before “crime” • They tend to persist through life • Personality? • G&H argue against this--LSC doesn’t “require crime” • But, “well within the meaning of personality”

  7. Causes of Low Self-Control • We are all born without self-control • Self Control is established in early childhood (age 8) • Causes must be in early childhood • Parents failure to supervise, recognize, punish • Straight from Patterson, but no role for “positive learning” (positive reinforcement) • “What parent kind of parent would train their kids to be delinquent?” • Biology? Infants might differ on “impulsiveness or verbal ability…but all can be socialized • Is this a cop out? ADHD?

  8. Implications of Low Self-Control • The sole cause of crime and “analogous behaviors” • All Crime? • “Analogous Behaviors?” • Explains “stability” of criminality • Low self-control is stable over time • What does this mean for Hirschi’s social bonds?

  9. 2 Explanations (Social Selection & Social Causation) Social Bonds Low Self Control Crime Pure Social Selection Poverty, Delinquent Peers, Social Bonds, Neighborhood Low Self Control Crime

  10. Empirical Support • Tautology Problems • Only if self control inferred from“behavioral measures” (e.g., delinquency) • Attitudinal measures • I would rather read a book than engage in physical activities. • I tend to be value the “here and now” and do not like to plan my life.

  11. Empirical Support • Moderate to strong relationship • With delinquency, crime, and “analogous behaviors” (smoking cigs, driving fast) • Among the strongest predictors of crime • Similar strength regardless of who is tested (male/female, etc) • BUT: • Controlling for low self-control weakens, but doesn’t eliminate “social” causation • In other words, it appears as though low self-control is not the sole cause of crime • Are white collar offenders different from “street” offenders? (Some evidence they are)

  12. Policy Implications • Low self-control stable after age 8 • Only “early prevention” can reduce crime • Train parents, support parents?? • Hirschi pessimistic about this • BUT, that is the whole point of Patterson’s work • Typical “rehabilitation” won’t reduce crime • Changing “bonds” won’t reduce crime

  13. REIVEW • Central Concepts • Empirical Support? • Scope? • Parsimony?

  14. Criticisms • Why do people desist from criminal activity? • Not the “sole” cause of crime • Bonds still more important? • Social learning measures still important • Old wine in a new bottle? (Single Factor?) • Parenting sole cause of self-control? • Traditional Rehabilitation won’t work? • Trait vs. “Cognitive Skill”

More Related