1 / 13

Internalized Stigma and Clinical Harm Reduction

Internalized Stigma and Clinical Harm Reduction. Sheila Vakharia, LMSW Florida International University Housing Works, Inc. sheila.vakharia@gmail.com. Stigmatization – Definition. “Stigmatization is entirely contingent on access to social , economic and political power that allows

navid
Download Presentation

Internalized Stigma and Clinical Harm Reduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internalized Stigma and Clinical Harm Reduction Sheila Vakharia, LMSW Florida International University Housing Works, Inc. sheila.vakharia@gmail.com

  2. Stigmatization – Definition • “Stigmatization is entirely contingent on access to social, economic and political power that allows • the identification of differentness, • the constructionof stereotypes, • the separationof labeled persons into distinct categories and • the full execution of disapproval, rejection, exclusion, and discrimination” Link & Phelan, 2001

  3. The Public Stigma of Addiction:Current Research (and what we already know) • Attributing responsibility and blame onto users for their problems(Corrigan, Kuwabara & O’Shaughnessy, 2009) • Criminalization of illicit substance possession and/or use(Cross, Johnson, Davis & Liberty, 2001; Lee & Rasinski, 2005) • Association with violence and danger(Rasinski, Woll & Cooke, 2005; Corrigan et al. 2009) • “Drug-free” work environments and mandatory drug screening(Macdonald, Hall, Roman, Stockwell, Coghlan & Nesvaag, 2010) • Mandated abstinence-oriented substance abuse treatment by criminal justice system, child protective services, social services, etc. (Radcliffe & Stevens, 2008) • Negative portrayal in the news and media(Corrigan, Watson, Gracia, Slopen, Rasinski & Hall, 2005)

  4. Individual Reactions to Stigmatization • Being energized by it – • Experience what some call “righteous anger” and use it to fuel advocacy, protest and other empowerment activities • Also known as “stigma resistance” or “stigma reactance” • Turning a negative into a positive • Some studies of members from some stigmatized groups that actually have higher self-esteem than majority group members Corrigan & Watson, 2002

  5. Individual Reactions to Stigmatization • Neutrality or indifference – • an awareness of the stigma, but no personalization or net impact • Some studies which have shown that members of some stigmatized groups have equal self-esteem when compared to majority group members • Developing self-stigma – • Stigmatized individuals “living in a culture steeped in stigmatizing images, may accept these notions and suffer diminished self-esteem and self-efficacy as a result” Corrigan & Watson, 2002

  6. What mediates these different responses? 1. Six domains of stigma (Jones et al., 1984) • Concealability – Hidden or obvious? Is visibility controllable? • Course – Pattern of change over time. Ultimate outcome? • Disruptiveness – Block/hamper interaction/communication? • Aesthetic qualities – To what extent is it repellant, ugly? • Origin – Where did it come from? Who responsible? Why? • Peril – What kind of danger is posed? How imminent? 2. Individual “contingencies of self-worth” (Crocker & Wolfe, 2001) “A domain or category of outcomes on which a person has staked his/her self-esteem” • Examples – Approval, appearance, family support, competency, competition, God’s love, virtue

  7. What mediates these different responses? 3. Social cognitive model (Watson & River, 2005) • Incorporated contributions of Crocker (2001) and added “perceived legitimacy” and “group identification” • Low/high levels of PL and Low/high levels of GI predict responses to stigma 4.Self-stigma components (Corrigan, Watson & Barr, 2006) • Stigma Awareness • Stigma Agreement • Self-concurrence • Self-Esteem Decrement

  8. Brief Summary Before Moving on… • Stigma does not impact every member of a stigmatized group • If it does, does not affect them all in the same way and may affect them for different reasons • Self-stigma is not necessarily a fixed “trait,” can be fluid and influenced by situations • LIMITATION: There is no specific theory about the particular impact of stigma on drug-using populations, rather, we must apply pre-existing theories based on other stigmatized groups.

  9. The Self-Stigma of Addiction:Current Research (and there’s not much) • Lower self-esteem and self-efficacy (Link & Phelan, 2001) • Negative attitudes about drug treatment and early treatment drop-out (Radcliffe & Stevens, 2008) • Mistrust of providers and low satisfaction (Conner, Rosen, Wexle & Brown, 2010; Conner & Rosen, 2008) • Continued substance use and negative beliefs about recovery (Boeri, 2004) • Deviant identity development (Copes, Hochstetler & Williams, 2008; Rodner, 2005) • Limits meaningful interpersonal relationships (Mateu-Gelabert, Maslow, Flom, Sandoval, Bolvard & Friedman, 2005) • Judgment and mistrust of other users (Simmonds & Coomber, 2009; Rodner, 2005)

  10. How does it look in Clinical Practice? • Client’s use of language: “clean,” “dirty,” “strong,” “weak” • Client’s use of labels: “crackhead,” “junkie,” “drunk” • Underreporting or not reporting current drug use/ risk behaviors • Shame • Guilt • Limiting oneself from pursuing opportunities • Transference and projection onto provider • NOTE* Can be mistaken for symptoms of co-occurring mental illness, but also vice versa

  11. Treatment Approaches:(not a lot of empirical evidence) • Engaging in empowerment and advocacy activities • Brief interventions have mixed results • Psychoanalysis, long-term therapies • Cognitive therapy to address schemas – contingencies of self-worth, perceived legitimacy, stigma agreement and self-concurrence • But then are we being complicit to public stigma?

  12. Importance of having the discussion • There is still not enough research about the actual experiences of self-stigma from the perspective of drug users themselves • Limited intervention options for CBOs • Need for more research • Until then, we can learn from lessons of the theoretical literature and begin to write about what is working for us with our populations…

  13. Thank you!

More Related