data quality issues affecting statistical uses of federal and state criminal records n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Data Quality Issues Affecting Statistical Uses of Federal and State Criminal Records PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Data Quality Issues Affecting Statistical Uses of Federal and State Criminal Records

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12
natara

Data Quality Issues Affecting Statistical Uses of Federal and State Criminal Records - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

121 Views
Download Presentation
Data Quality Issues Affecting Statistical Uses of Federal and State Criminal Records
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Quality Issues Affecting Statistical Uses of Federal and State Criminal Records 2012 FCSM Statistical Policy Seminar, December 5, 2012 Gerard F. Ramker, Deputy Director U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics

  2. Simplified Criminal History Record - “Rap Sheet”

  3. Administrative/Operational Uses of Criminal History Records • Criminal Justice Uses • Police name checks • Charging decisions • Pre-trial release decisions – held in custody or released on recognizance • Sentencing • Correctional classification – housing assignments in jails/prisons • Public registries (sex offender) • Firearm purchases, licenses, permits, etc. • Non-Criminal Justice Uses • Pre-employment screening • Professional/Occupational licenses • Permits

  4. Research & Statistical Uses of Criminal History Records • Studies of recidivism – pre-post comparisons of arrests, convictions, incarcerations • Program evaluation • State-level studies: • Legislative impact studies/models • Forecasting prison/jail populations

  5. International Justice and Public Safety Network (Nlets) Interstate Identification Index State C State B FBI State Criminal History Record Repository Law Enforcement Agency Correctional Agency State A Prosecutor Court

  6. BJS Record Improvement Efforts • Funded state efforts • to automate manual records. • to add state records to national system including various NCIC records AND criminal history records. • Improve the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and availability of such records. • Have provided over $560 million to the states since 1995.

  7. Prisoner Recidivism Study • Administrative data from BJS’s National Corrections Reporting Program provided by state departments of corrections. • Sample of 74,000 released prisoners representing more than 400,000 persons released in the 32 states during 2005.

  8. BJS Memorandum of Understanding between BJS, the FBI, and Nlets. International Justice and Public Safety Network (Nlets) State A State C Interstate Identification Index FBI State B State D

  9. Data Acquisition/Processing • Raw rap sheet data (the state’s electronic response) • Parsed into a database containing five segments • Identification • Demographic • Arrest • Court • Corrections • Standardized database created • BJS research database • Public-use research database

  10. Application of DQ Assessment Tool • Focused on the BJS research database and the public-use file. • Files that derive in large measure from data that, in its native state: • Is highly unstructured. • Originates in different states guided by provisions of their separate criminal codes and codes of criminal procedure. • Ensuring that record parsing and standardization does not introduce errors. • Assessing/documenting other data quality issues

  11. Application of DQ Tool (continued) • Secondary focus on broader data quality issues and improvement strategies relating to operational uses of these records. • “Fitness for operational use” • State profiles for record repositories which highlight record completeness issues • Discussion with: • Associations representing record repositories on multi-state issues • Advisory bodies on policy issues involving reporting and representation standards

  12. Contact InformationDr. Gerard F. Ramker, Deputy DirectorBureau of Justice Statistics810 7th Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20531(202) 307-0765 - Gerard.Ramker@usdoj.gov