1 / 8

Plans for 05-06

Plans for 05-06. Baseline goals: Verify structural integrity of basic RICE-II design Biggest concern = OF ability to survive re-freeze Will have to rely on previous AMANDA experience in assessing cladding requirements. Verify 1 ns timing resolution

nasnan
Download Presentation

Plans for 05-06

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Plans for 05-06 • Baseline goals: • Verify structural integrity of basic RICE-II design • Biggest concern = OF ability to survive re-freeze • Will have to rely on previous AMANDA experience in assessing cladding requirements. • Verify 1 ns timing resolution • Ping RICE-II receivers with RICE-I Tx and vertex in conjunction with current RICE array • Verify 1 ns transient waveform response • Estimate and collect data on noise for an Rx on surface for possible surface co-deployment • Verify ray tracing effects through firn (impacts decision to use surface antennas, etc.) • Set groundwork for full-scale 06-07 deployment.

  2. 2005-06 plan, cont. • With existing, or to-be-drilled dry holes, measure noise @surface & examine surface waves beyond TIR. • Re-do RF reflection off bed; investigate coupling to snow, position-dependence of R(bottom), etc. • If access into IceCube holes possible: • Determine robustness of OF to freeze-in: • Drop ~300 m length of well-clad OF into IceCube hole (no attached electronics). OTDR during freeze-in; evaluate loss of signal • Radioglaciology/coupling of horn to firn: • Transmission thru firn: Drop aluminum reflector, on rope, into IC hole to depth of ~250 m. Ping with RF transmitter; look at reflected signal. • Submitting proposal to NSF for additional hole drilling

  3. Comment on drilling/geometry • Co-deployment in IC holes~1/3 Veff at high end relative to “ideal” geometry, but lower threshold relative to sparse array • Simulations tuning on ESS events: • dz~dQc at R~latten (R=distance to neutrino vertex) • ~100-120 m vertical spacing b/w Rx • dr ~latten/2 • ~500 m - 1 km horizontal spacing b/w Rx

  4. ICP geometry vs. 1 km-spacing

  5. ICP vs. 1km-hole spacing Veff 3x Veff at high end, but flux~E-3

  6. General comment on schedule • As attention increasingly focuses on GZK end of neutrino spectrum, increasing likelihood that GZK-expt will be built • ANITA, SalSA, OWL, etc (Rolf talk)… • Aside: have run salt vs. ice sims (ICRC05): • Salt signal~1/3 ice-signal, but higher density compensates in overall event rate • ANTARES+acoustic & IceCube+acoustic/radio are unique opportunities for a detector with sensitivity in range 102 GeV1011 GeV.

  7. Goals of NSF proposal • 3 dry holes, to depth of 300m @Pole, at r=0, r=2/3 km, r=2 km • Transparency measurements, horizontally, as f(z) • Birefringence measurements require <1ns timing at receiver. • Utility for acoustic measurements?

More Related