1 / 26

SYLLABUS PROPOSAL

SYLLABUS PROPOSAL. Rebeca Muñoz Trapote María Terán Álvarez Silvia Torres Sánchez Ane Viera Flores. THE WATER STATES. JUSTIFICATION. SPANISH-ENGLISH INFANT INTEGRATED CURRICULUM. DIRECT ENVIRONMENT. DAILY LIFE. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENTS AND AUTONOMY SKILLS. MAIN THEORIES.

nash
Download Presentation

SYLLABUS PROPOSAL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SYLLABUS PROPOSAL Rebeca Muñoz Trapote María Terán Álvarez Silvia Torres Sánchez Ane Viera Flores THE WATER STATES

  2. JUSTIFICATION SPANISH-ENGLISH INFANT INTEGRATED CURRICULUM • DIRECT ENVIRONMENT. • DAILY LIFE. • PERSONAL DEVELOPMENTS AND AUTONOMY SKILLS

  3. MAIN THEORIES Ausubel`sSignificative

  4. BODILY-KINESTESIC. • INTRAPERSONAL. • NATURALISTIC. • MUSICAL-RHYTHMIC AND HARMONIC • VISUAL-SPATIAL GARDNER`S MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES

  5. TELLO TELLEZ DE MENESES • Early Birth Program. • Opened Centre. • School Lunch Room. • School Magazine Humareda. • Publicaciones

  6. ROUTINES

  7. TRAFFIC LIGHTS

  8. BEHAVIOR CALENDAR

  9. CLASSROOM ORGANITATION

  10. METHODOLOGY

  11. ACTIVITIES IMPORTANCE OF THE GAMES

  12. USE OF PUPPET

  13. CULTURAL AWARENESS AND EXPRESSION

  14. PROJECT WATER STATES TOPICS OF THE PROJECT

  15. ACTIVITIES

  16. ASSESMENT AWARDS WATER STATES

  17. CONCLUSION By Canals (2001): «I.E.Constistoncausingseriousworkthattakesintoaccountmanyaspectsinvolved in theact of learning and sometimesweforget. I thinkourjobtokeep up ourchildren. Whentheywork, they are veryserious»

  18. BIBLIOGRAPHYAlario Trigueros, C., Alonso, M.C., Gómez, M.B., y Palacios, L. & R., M.A. (2006). Sunshine C. Madrid, España: LongmanAusubel, D. (1973). Adquisición y retención del conocimiento. Una perspectiva cognitiva. Barcelona: Paidós. Traducción Sánchez Barberán, G. (2002).British Council. Pedagogical guidelines for the Infant stage of the Official Integrated Curriculum (BOE May 2002)Bruner, J. (1988). Desarrollo cognitivo y educación. Madrid: Morata. (2001)Canals, M.A. (2001). Vivir las matemáticas. Barcelona: Octaedro, S.L.Montessori, M. (1928). Ideas generales sobre el método. Madrid: CEPE ciencias de la educación preescolar y espacial. Traducción García Tortosa, F. (1994)Piaget, J. (1969). Psicología y pedagogía. Traducción de Fernández Buey, F.J. (2001). Barcelona: Crítica.Real Decreto 1630/2006, de 29 de diciembre. (BOE nº4 de 04/01/2007).Vigotsky, L. (1934). Pensamiento y lenguaje: cognición y desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós. (1995).WEBGRAPHYAPPE. Portfolio europeo. [Recuperated: 30/January/2014] [Available in: http://www.oapee.es/oapee/inicio/iniciativas/portfolio.html]C.P. Tello Téllez de Meneses. (2014). [Recuperated: 12/01/1014] [Available in: http://ceiptellotellez.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/]Multiple Intelligences. [Recuperated: 25/January/2014] [Available in: http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html]

More Related