1 / 27

Medulloblastoma

Medulloblastoma. Sidnei Epelman, M.D. Medulloblastoma. Most common malignant brain tumor of childhood - 20% Diagnosed in children less than 15 years Bimodal distribution – 3- 4 years and 8 – 9 years Male predominance Undifferentiated blue round cell tumor - WHO IV

naomi
Download Presentation

Medulloblastoma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Medulloblastoma Sidnei Epelman, M.D.

  2. Medulloblastoma • Mostcommonmalignantbrain tumor ofchildhood - 20% • Diagnosed in childrenlessthan 15 years • Bimodal distribution – 3- 4 yearsand 8 – 9 years • Male predominance • Undifferentiatedblue round cell tumor - WHO IV • Originatingfrompluripotentneuroectodermalstemcells • Cerebellar PNET • Rareinheritedsyndromes • Sporadicevolution

  3. MedulloblastomaPrognosticMarkers • Age • M stage • Extentofresection • Histologicvariant • Molecular markers • Beta catenin • MYCN, MYCC • ERBB2 • SHH

  4. Genes andSignalingpathways • WTN pathwayaberrant in Turcot`s syndrome– 15% - betterprognosis • Amplificationof MYCC oncogene – largecellvariant – pooreroutcome • ExpressionofTyrosinekinase receptor ERBB2 – 40% - pooreroutcome • Increasedexpression neurotrophin-3 receptor (TYKC) – bettersurvival • Amplificationof OXT2 homeobox gene – anaplasticvariant • Elevationsof beta catenin in expressioninvolved in Wntsignalingpathway – improvedsurvival

  5. Genes andSignalingpathways • Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome – inheritedgermlinemutationof PTCH gene onchromosome 22 – encodessonichedgehog (SHH) receptor PATCHED1 (PTC1) thatnormallyrepresses SHH • Somaticmutation PTC1 associated – desmoplasticvariant – potentialtarget – 10-20%

  6. Metastatictumors • Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta • Memberof RAS-MAP kinasepathway

  7. Histologicalvariants • Classicorundifferentiated – 70% • Desmoplastic / extensivenodularity – betterprognosis • Largecell / anaplastic – poorerprognosis

  8. Prognostic Markers

  9. MEDULLOBLASTOMA in children less than 3 years Medulloblastoma/PNET of young children are more aggressive than those of older children: • It grows more rapidly • Recurrence occurs usually within one year from diagnosis • Higher chance to metastasize from the primary tumor site to other parts of the brain and spine

  10. Medulloblastoma in younger than 3 years • Management is complicated • Avoiding use ofRadiotherapydue to late effects to thebrain • 40% disseminatedatdiagnosis • Betterprognosisfactor – biologyofthe tumor • Desmoplastic – 75% cure withchemotherapyalone

  11. Symptoms at presentantion Those children less than 3 years old: • Behavioral (48%) • Headache (12%) • Not reported in those less than 2 years old • Seizures (7%) • Enlarging head in less than 1 year old • Gastrointestinal symptoms like

  12. Treatment • Systemictreatment for tumorslikely to metastatize • Reduce tumor burden prior to use ofanothertreatmentmodality • Used in children < 3 years in order to sparesideeffectsofradiationtherapy • Limitations • Bloodbrainbarrier

  13. Treatment • Multi-modalitytreatment – dependentupon • Histology • Location • Age • Surgery • RadiationTherapy • Chemotherapy

  14. Surgery • Total ornear-total – bettersurvival • Cerebellarmutismsyndrome – 25% • Nystagmus • Truncalhypotonia • Dysmetria • Dysphagia • Markedemotionallability

  15. Neuroradiographic staging • Central review of international studies – inadequate spinal neuroimaging or misinterpreted in 25% of patients

  16. Effects of radiotherapy on the developing brain of the young child • Learning difficulties • Attention/concentration difficulties • Short-term memory deficits • Social adjustment problems • Hearing, speech and language problems • Impaired physical growth (hypothalamus, pituitary, spine)

  17. RadiationSideEffects Late effects Neurocognitive Endocrine Vascular Secondarymalignancies • Acuteeffects • Generallyrelated to tumor inflammation • Dependentupon tumor location • Nausea • Vomiting • Headaches • Weighloss • Mucosites • Fatigue

  18. ManagementAlternatives with increased efficacy • Intensivechemotherapywithperipheralstemcellsupport • Protocolwithhigh-dosemethotrexate • Focal radiationtherapy to primary site

  19. Survival of Young Children with Medulloblastoma and Supratentorial PNET • Event-free survival is poor with conventional chemotherapy strategies attempting to either • delay (Baby POG 1) • avoid irradiation (CCG-921; CCG-9921; BB-SFOP; St.Jude/Duke/CHOP “Baby” & UK-CCG “Baby” protocols): • Medulloblastoma =<10-34% 2 to 3 year EFS • ST PNET=0-19% 2 to 3 year EFS • Median time to relapse for pts. <3 years of age at diagnosis…6 to 9 mos

  20. Head Start treatment strategy • Delivery of highly intensive chemotherapy over a relatively short time period after diagnosis (less than 6 months) • Avoidance of brain irradiation in children achieving complete responses to initial treatment • Reduction in the doses and volume of brain irradiation for those children either with incomplete responses to initial treatment or older children (6 to 10 years old)

  21. TreatmentLocalizeddisease • Geyer – 9921 - SystemicChemotherapy – 92 pts • 5 year EFS – 32% • 83% ofEventfree - survivorshad no RT • Grill – SFOP - intensifiedsalvagestrategies - 79 pts • ProlongedchemoplusHdosisand local RT/CSA • M0R0 - 73% - 5y-OS • M0R+ – 41% • M+ - 13%

  22. TreatmentLocalizeddisease • Rutkowski – Systemicand intraventricular chemotherapywithMethotrexate • HIT-SKK 92 – 43 pts • M0R0 – 82% – 7yPFS • M0R+ - 50% • M+ - 33% • Survivalaccordinghistology • Desmoplastic - 85% • Classic - 34%

  23. Proposal COG - SIOP< 3-5years – M0 Desmoplastic • Regimen A – modified HIT without IT • Regimen B – Modified 99703 • Regimen C – HITSKK92 • No Radiotherapy Classic • Regime D – 99703 with focal conformalRt • Regime E – 99703 with focal conformal RT andlow dose CSI • No/Low dose CSI

  24. TretamentMetastaticdisease • HIT 2000 – M+ - IntensifiedChemotherapy + RT • IntenseInduction (CDDP, CFM, VCR, hdMTXandI.ventr)+ HD Chemo + Conventional RT 24 Gy + boostwhen residual tumor • Objetive response rate 82% • Chi – Head start 2 – regime A2 • Induction (CDDP, CFM, ETO, VCR, hdMTX) + HD Chemo (Carbo, ETO, TT) + or – RT local/CSA • 60% 3yOS • 49% 3yEFS

  25. Santa Marcelina Hospital/ TUCCAMedulloblastoma/ < 3 yearsof age • 9/14 patients - H Dosis MTX withcarboplatinandCyclowithout RXT • 4 alive • 4 Progressivedisease • 1 Diedof LMA , 6 yearsafterdiagnosisofMedulloblastoma in remission • 5/14 otherprocotolswithlowdosis • 4 progressivedisease • 1alive 5 years

  26. Conclusions M0 • Stratificationaccordinghistology • Desmoplastic • Chemo-only management • Classical • Evaluationofintensifiedchemoandattempt to avoid as much RT M+ • Desmoplastic • Reductionoftreatment • Classical • Intensifiedchemo + Hdosis+ RT; newagents?

  27. Future

More Related