1 / 59

Topic and Focus in Old French V1 and V2 structures

Topic and Focus in Old French V1 and V2 structures. Marie Labelle (UQAM) & Paul Hirschbühler (U. d’Ottawa). Problem. Traditional analysis: Old French = V2 of the Germanic type : V2 in CP  : [ CP XP V [ TP ….]] (e.g. Adams, Vance…)

naida-giles
Download Presentation

Topic and Focus in Old French V1 and V2 structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Topic and Focus in Old French V1 and V2 structures Marie Labelle (UQAM) & Paul Hirschbühler (U. d’Ottawa)

  2. Problem • Traditional analysis: Old French = V2 of the Germanic type : • V2 in CP  : [CP XP V [TP ….]] (e.g. Adams, Vance…) (or V2 in TP  : [TP XP V [VP ….]] (e.g. Lemieux)) • Rinke & Meisel (2009) : Old French as Topic initial  : • V under T; SpecTP = Topic : [TP XPTop V [VP …...]Foc ] • R&M: “[Subject] inversion in Old French is contingent on the topicalisation of a non-subject constituent” (like contemp. It., Sp., Port.) • R&M: “An incompatibility of the post-verbal subject with an interpretation as information focus or as part of a thetic sentence would cause the subject to move to the pre-verbal position.” (p.17)

  3. Rinke & Meisel German Old French Preverbal constituent topic adverb that links with the previous discourse (+/- topic) Postverbal subject (part of the) focus (based on Villehardouin & Les 7 sages de Rome, beginning 13th c.) • Preverbal constituent • topic • informational focus • contrastive focus • adverbthatisneithertopicnor focus • Postverbal subject • topic • (part of the) focus

  4. Old High German(Hinterhölzl & Petrova) • Hinterhölzl & Petrova (2005, 2010) : • « ... the position of the finite verb serves to distinguish the information-structural domains of Topic and Focus in sentences of the Old High German period. » (2005:2) • verb-second = topic initial : [XPgiv/acc]TOP [Vfin ...…]COMMENT/FOCUS • verb-initial = all focus : [Vfin…XPnew…]FOCUS • (Modern German = grammaticalization of V2) Hinterhölzl & Petrova. 2005. Rhetorical Relations and Verb Placement in Early Germanic Languages : Evidence from the Old High German Tatian Translation (9th century)

  5. Aims of the study • Evaluate the hypothesis that, in Old French, the preverbal position hosts topics & that constituents belonging to the focus remain in postverbal position. • Identify and date eventual grammatical changes in the discursive functions of preverbal elements and postverbal subjects. • Evaluate the possibility that a Topic-first stage intervened in the transition from V2 to SVO: V2 > Topic first > Subject first

  6. Definitions Topic • “The topic constituent identifies the entity or set of entities under which the information expressed in the comment constituent should be stored in the [Common Ground] content.” (Krifka 2007 Basic notions of information structure) • Typically a definite constituent, referring to an entity given in the discourse or accessible.

  7. Information focus • Pragmatic principle of progression (e.g. Charolles 1978): If a sentence is to be informative, it must contain material that is new in relation to previously known information. • The part of the sentence containing new information that should be stored in the common ground. • Gundel & Fretheim (2004) : Topic/Information Focus = Theme/Rheme, Topic/Comment... : relationally given/new information respectively. (In Handbook of Pragmatic Theory.)

  8. DefinitionsInformation focus • Some sentences may be all-focus (Thetic) • e.g. presentative sentences: There are two cats in the garden. • Büring (2005:5): not all the information in a comment is new: A: When did [Aristotle Onassis]Topic marry Jacqueline Kennedy? B: [He]Topic [married her [in 1968]Focus]]Comment (Krifka 2007: ex. 41) « a focused expression would be an informative part of the sentence, a backgrounded one an uninformative one. »

  9. DefinitionsContrastive Focus • Contrastive Focus : “material which the speaker calls to the addressee’s attention, thereby often evoking a contrast with other entities that might fill the same position.” (Gundel & Fretheim 2004) (Krifka 2007: Focus indicates the presence of alternatives that are relevant for the interpretation of linguistic expressions.)

  10. DefinitionsContrastive Focus • Contrastive Focus : “material which the speaker calls to the addressee’s attention, thereby often evoking a contrast with other entities that might fill the same position.” (Gundel & Fretheim 2004) (Krifka 2007: Focus indicates the presence of alternatives that are relevant for the interpretation of linguistic expressions.) • May be marked by expressions like: even, only, also

  11. DefinitionsContrastive Focus • Contrastive Focus : “material which the speaker calls to the addressee’s attention, thereby often evoking a contrast with other entities that might fill the same position.” (Gundel & Fretheim 2004) (Krifka 2007: Focus indicates the presence of alternatives that are relevant for the interpretation of linguistic expressions.) • May be marked by expressions like: even, only, also • A contrastive focus may be part of a topic. • A: What do your siblings do? • B: [My [SIster]Focus]Topic [studies MEDicine]Focus, and [my [BROther]Focus]Topic is [working on a FREIGHT ship]Focus.

  12. The corpus • 19 parsed Old French texts dated between 980 and 1309 (7 in verse, 12 in prose – from MCVF & Penn supplement) • All positive declarative matrix IP’s with a full DP subject • V1 and V2 clauses only

  13. V1 clauses Are post-verbal subjects in V1 clauses always (part of) the focus of the clause?

  14. V1 clauses other than thosewhere V introduces direct discourse* • Taking into account the context, coding of subjects as being • T = Topics; F = (part of) Information Focus; Unclear (Only strict V1 clauses considered, i.e. not introduced by a coordinator) *These will be discussed independently.

  15. V1 clauses other than thosewhere V introduces direct discourse* • Taking into account the context,we coded subjects as being • T = Topics; F = (part of) Information Focus; Unclear • “It does not seem that the postverbal position in V1 sentences is pragmatically specialized.” (Rouveret 2004: 196) (Only strict V1 clauses considered, i.e. not introduced by a coordinator) *These will be discussed independently.

  16. Examples Topic subjects • Curecerent s' en les princes des Philistiens get-angry-PST refl-gen the princes of the Philistians ‘Got angry at this the princes of the Philistians’ (1170-QLR1-2,.1332) • Cunuit Brandans a l' air pluius ‘knew Brendan from the wet wind Que li tens ert mult annüus. ‘that the weather was very worrysome’ (1120-BRENDAN,56.675)

  17. Orange underline: prose texts • Alternation between Topic & Focus before 1200 • V1 declaratives disappear around 1200. • When they re-emerge at the end of the 13th c., the subjects seem to • be foci; but few examples.

  18. V1 with verbs introducing direct discourse • VS = V1 • Dit Roland: « ... » • SVX = V2 with preverbal subject • Roland dit: « ... » • XVS = V2 with a postverbal subject • Ço dit Roland: « ... » = preverbal object • Donc dit Roland: « ... » = preverbal adverb • Same informational function of the subject: signal a new speaker or a change of speaker

  19. Excluded (subjectalways postverbal): • Parentheticals: "Deus",dist li quens, "or ne saijo que face." (1100-ROLAND,148.2000) • Clauses following the direct discourse: "Si fus," (ce) dist li empereres. (1267-CASSIDORUS,659.4349)

  20. Subjects of verbs introducing direct discourse are almost always definite

  21. VS sentences were replaced, not by XVS sentences, but by SVX sentences.

  22. V2 clauses

  23. Rinke & Meisel German Old French Preverbal constituent topic adverb that links with the previous discourse (+/- topic) Postverbal subject (part of the) focus (based on Villehardouin & Les 7 sages de Rome, beginning 13th c.) • Preverbal constituent • topic • contrastive focus • informational focus • adverbthatisneithertopicnor focus • Postverbal subject • topic • (part of the) focus

  24. Can a contrastive focus be preverbal? YES.

  25. Contrastive focus - subjects • Meïsmes la pucele y fu, ‘even the girl was there’ (1267-CASSIDORUS,149.1211) • Sul David é Jonathas le sourent. ‘only David and Jonathan knew it’ (1170 QLR1-2,.757) • nes li oisel s' an istront fors; ‘even the birds will leave’(1170-YVAIN,13.394)

  26. Contrastive focus – non-subjects • Meïsmes a l' empereour sont les lermes venues aus yex, ‘even to the emperor have the tears come to the eyes’ (1267-CASSIDORUS,664.4447) • Et li jorz meïsmes fu emprise la queste dou saint Graal ... ‘and that very day was started the quest for the holy Grail’ (1225-QUESTE,104.2769) Example with a null subject : • del tranchant, non mie del plat, le fiert ... ‘with the cutting edge, not with the flat side, (he) hits him’ (1170-YVAIN,128.4433)

  27. Subjects • Given that: • Definite subjects tend to be topics; • Indefinite subjects make bad topics & are often found in thetic sentences; • Is there a tendency to find definite subjects preverbally and indefinite subjects postverbally?

  28. Strictly V2 clauses:

  29. Whether preverbally or postverbally, definite subjects strongly dominate. • A large number of the post-verbal definite subjects should be topics. (Not quantified)

  30. Indefinite subjects appear more often in postverbal position: Total number of indefinites: 192. Increase in tendency of indef. sbj. to appear in postverbal position:

  31. Can preverbal subjects be part of the information focus? YES.

  32. Examples Preverbal indefinite subjects = focus • Uns seinz hermites i maneit ‘A saint hermit lived there’ (1180-MARIE-DE-FRANCE,182.3715) • Une musteile vint curant, ‘A weasel came running’ (1180-MARIE-DE-FRANCE,187.3815) • Doi gentil homme du paÿs, qui pas ne l' amoient, saillirent hors a un trespas, ‘Two gentlemen of the country, who didn’t like him, jumped out at a passage’ (1267-CASSIDORUS,643.4056)

  33. Preverbal constituents that can’t be topics & are part of information focus Adj, Q, Pred, Non-finite V

  34. Preverbal Q, non finite V • QP: Mut est LanvalTop en grant esfreie! ‘much is Lanval in great fright’ (1180-Marie de France, 78.1592) • nfV: Trenchet li ad li quensTop le destre poign, cut him has the count the right hand ‘The count cut his right hand’ (1100 Roland,142.1926)

  35. Preverbal adj, pred. • adj: Malade ot geü longuemant la pucele, ‘sick has laid a-long-time the girl’ (1177-YVAIN,177.6235) • prd: Male chose est murmure, ‘bad thing is whisper’ (1279-SOMME-ROYAL,1,64.1758)

  36. Objects • Is a preverbal object an informational topic or focus? • There was a change.

  37. Work of Marchello-Nizia (1995) • Roland (1100) [verse] OV(S) extremely frequent, all types of O’s • O more often rhematic than thematic (M-N. p. 99-100) • Queste (1225) [prose] OV(S) more limited; serves to • thematize the O • place the rheme in first position (marked) • in expressions of type donner conseil (give advice) • when O is modified by an intensifier like grant (great), maint (many) (Same found by Zaring (2010) for OV with non-finite verbs)

  38. 253 preverbal objects Preverbal objects tend to be focus before 1220 and topics afterwards.

  39. Preverbal indefinite focus object • .XX. escheles ad li reis anumbrees. ‘twenty columns has the king counted’ (1100-ROLAND,112.1459) • et divers chanz chantoit chascuns; ‘and various songs sang each one’ (1170-YVAIN,15.453)

  40. Preverbal definite focus object • La main destre leva adonques la dame, ‘The hand right raised then the lady’ (1177 Yvain,202.7065) • La maniere comment il pristrent la cité de Baudas et le calife nous conterent les marcheans; ‘The manner how they took the city of Baudas and the calife told us the merchants’(1309 Joinville,289.3370)

  41. Preverbal adverbials and PP’s • Are they topics? • Preverbal adverbs & PP are rarely the topic. • They may (or not) link with the previous discourse. • Postverbal definite subjects tend to be topics (still to quantify)

  42. Preverbal focus PP • En grant effrei erent amdui. ‘In great fright were both (of them)’ (1180-MARIE-DE-FRANCE,20.359) • Here the PP is clearly the informational focus • The post-verbal subject is the topic.

  43. Preverbal PP linking with discourse • Por ce panse mes sire Yvains qu' il l' ocirra premieremant; ‘For this thinks my lord Yvains that he will kill him first’ (1177-YVAIN,102.3563) • Del colp chancelad li gluz ‘At the blow faltered the giant’ (1170 QLR1-2,.470) • The postverbal subjects are the topics; • The preverbal PP may link with the previous discourse without being the topic.

  44. Preverbal adv + topic subject • Si demora laienz Perceval avec s' antain. ‘thus stayed there Perceval with his aunt’ (1225-QUESTE,107.2806) • donc pres Lethgiers a predier, ‘ thus starts Leger to pray’ (0980-SAINT-LEGER,XXXI.206) • Puis vaitli emfes l' emperethur servir. ‘then goes the child the emperor to serve’ (1090-SAINT-ALEXIS,7.80)

  45. Is there an evolution? • What is the distribution of preverbal constituents in V2 sentences with a full DP subject? (6336 clauses)

  46. Only V2 clauses not introduced by a coordinator Other = acc, dat, adj, pred, non-fin V. Means XP V : Verse: sbj = 55%; avp+pp = 31%; other = 14% Prose: sbj = 57%; avp+pp = 39%; other = 5%)

  47. Sentences of type : coord XP V Coord = et, ou, mais, car (/que)

  48. Stronger tendency of coordinated sentences to be SVX. Coord. = et, ou, mais, car (/que)

  49. All V2 sentences: strictly V2 + coord. V2 Coord.: et, ou, mais, car (/que) Means XP V : Verse: sbj = 58%; avp+pp = 29%; other = 17% Prose: sbj = 64%; avp+pp = 33%; other = 5%)

  50. XP V and coord XP V:

More Related