working group 2a self evaluation of infrastructure development status l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on

Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status. Difficulties and Solutions. 2A Questions/Difficulties. Availability of expertise for self assessment Political commitment More detailed description within IAEA documents

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status' - myron


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
working group 2a self evaluation of infrastructure development status

Working Group 2ASelf-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

Difficulties and Solutions

2a questions difficulties
2A Questions/Difficulties
  • Availability of expertise for self assessment
  • Political commitment
  • More detailed description within IAEA documents
  • Re-evaluation of 19 infrastructure issues should be periodically made
  • International cooperation should be fostered both bilateral and multilateral
  • Clear responsibilities should be defined
2a questions difficulties3
2A Questions/Difficulties

7. Consistency of three documents, (Milestones, Evaluation, Guidelines) needs to be assured. (NEPIO and others as well)

8. What is the optimal number of self evaluations?

9. Evaluation of infrastructure for mature nuclear power programs should also be encouraged.

10. There is a lack of available international experience to do the assessments

11. Objectivity of self evaluation needs to be ensured

12. Clear criteria of to determine status is needed, i.e, significant action needed, minor action needed and no action needed.

2a questions difficulties4
2A Questions/Difficulties

13. Economic and industrial capabilities for developing nuclear power program need to assured as well as ones for nuclear.

2a needs solutions
2A Needs/Solutions
  • Comprehensive training program for internal and external evaluators
  • Human resources continue to be needed
  • Generation of documentation for internal and external use (reports for public consumption)
  • External consultants should be considered for realistic assessment
  • International cooperation (sharing experiences, lessons learned) --- IAEA should facilitate
2a needs solutions6
2A Needs/Solutions

6. Cooperation with neighbouring countries

7. Walk-through simulations (tabletop exercise as a part of workshop)

8. IAEA observers on self assessment

9. Milestones document is useful tool but only one tool

10. Action plans based on self assessment are needed

2a needs solutions7
2A Needs/Solutions

11. Computer models for assessment assistance should be developed by IAEA.