1 / 23

KASI Optical Astronomy Division Journal Club

KASI Optical Astronomy Division Journal Club. Main JC. 1. Presentation by the speaker 2. Discussion on the paper 3. Basic questions (off-time?). KASI Optical Astronomy Division Journal Club.

myron
Download Presentation

KASI Optical Astronomy Division Journal Club

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. KASI Optical Astronomy Division Journal Club Main JC 1. Presentation by the speaker 2. Discussion on the paper 3. Basic questions (off-time?)

  2. KASI Optical Astronomy Division Journal Club Evidence of Major Dry Mergers at M* > 2x1011 M⊙from Curvature in Early-Type Galaxy Scaling Relations? - M. Bernardi et al. 2011, MNRAS, 412, L6 - June 23, 2011 Joon Hyeop Lee

  3. Color-magnitude relation (red sequence) of early-type galaxies • : “Brighter early-type galaxies tend to be redder.” • Thought to be mainly because the metal abundance depends on galaxy mass. • More massive → Easier to maintain metal rich gas against galactic winds → Redder color. Kodama et al. (1998) M87

  4. Bernardi et al. (2011b): Color-magnitude relation (CMR) of early-type galaxies differs significantly from a pure power law. • Curving downwards at low L (Mr > –20.5): previously reported (Graham 2008; Skelton et al. 2009) • Curving upwards at high L (Mr < –22.5): first reported by Bernardi et al. (2011). Not due to stellar population effects → Another factors may affect CMRs in addition to the basic metal enrichment. → Merger - Major? Minor? - Wet? Dry? Bernardi et al. (2011b)

  5. Early-type galaxy selection • 1. Hyde & Bernardi (2009) selection: b/a > 0.6, fracDev = 1 (almost purely ellipticals) • 2. Cr > 2.86 (containing many edge-on discs) • For the 2 samples • Investigated the ①sizes, ② velocity dispersions (σ), ③ surface brightnesses (μ), ④ colors, ⑤ axis ratios (b/a) and ⑥ color gradients as functions of stellar mass (M*). • Focusing on the curvature at high L

  6. None of the correlations is pure power laws. • At faint, low-mass end (log M*/M⊙<10.5): • Curve towards bluer colors, larger sizes, fainter μ, smaller axis ratios and color gradients. • At bright, high-mass end (log M*/M⊙>11.3): • Curve towards redder colors, larger sizes, smaller than expected σ, fainter μ, smaller axis ratios and color gradients.

  7. M* is replaced with σ. • Little curvature at log σ/km s-1 > 2.2. • Correlations vs. μ, color gradient and axis ratio are almost flat.

  8. The relation between Mdyn (∝ Rσ2) and M*is well described by a single power law over the entire range: the curvature in the sizes and σ cancel. → Because the objects are virialized, whatever their merger histories.

  9. Major dissipationless (= dry) mergers • Change the sizes in proportion to the masses. • Leave σ and colors unchanged. • -W = 2K, K+W = K – 2K = -K = W/2 • Equial mass merging: -mv2/2 - mv2/2 = -2m (v2/2) • Minor dissipationless mergers • Produce larger fractional changes in size than in mass. • Decrease σ and colors. + = + = < 1 • The curvature in the correlations between M*, size, σ and color have all been discussed in this context (e.g. Davies et al. 1983; Bernardi et al. 2007, 2010, 2011).

  10. What’s new in this letter • All of the curvature occur at the same mass scale. • This mass scale is also important for axis raitos and color gradients. • The curvature is absent when M* is replaced by σ.

  11. Axis ratio • Van der Wel et al. (2009): the width of the b/a distribution changes at log(M*/M⊙) ~ 10.5 → “Above this mass, assembly histories are dominated by major mergers.” → This is not the full story. Van der Wel et al. (2009)

  12. Axis ratio • Comparison of the 2 early-type samples: HB09 (b/a>0.6) and Cr cut (no b/a limit) • → The Cr cut sample – considerably smaller b/a at small M* • → Primarily due to an increased incidence of disks and contamination by Sa galaxies: morphological mix! Log M* [M⊙]

  13. Axis ratio • The real feature of interest is the drop in b/a at at log(M*/M⊙) > 11.3, where morphological mix is no longer an issue. (Van der Wel also found it, but dismissed it.) • The narrowing of the distribution at log(M*/M⊙) ~ 10.5 marks the transition from dissipational (wet) to dissipationless (dry) histories, or a change in relative importance of SNe and AGN feedback. Log M* [M⊙]

  14. Axis ratio • The decrease in b/a at log(M*/M⊙) > 11.3 marks the transition to major dry mergers. • Has been expected for some time (e.g. Gonzalez-Garcia & van Albada 2005; Ragone-figueroa et al. 2010) • First found by Bernardi et al. (2008) • Indicates an increasing incidence of major radial mergers, resulting in more prolate objects. Log M* [M⊙]

  15. Color Gradient • Defined as model color – Petrosian color (approximately half-light radius color – total color). • Maximal at log(M*/M⊙) > 11.3 : consistent with previous estimates (e.g. Roche et al. 2010; Bernardi et al. 2011). • → Onset of major dry merger? • Major mergers: decrease color gradients (di Matteo et al. 2009) • Minor mergers: should not change the gradients significnatly (Kobayashi 2004) or may enhance them slightly • → The smaller bluer object involved in the minor merger is expected to deposit most of its stars at larger distances from the center.

  16. Color Gradient • Major mergers double M*, but do not change σ. • → Color gradient vs. σ plot should show less of a feature than when gradients are ploted vs. M*. • The great scatter at σ > 150 km s-1: a range of merger histories, hence gradients, can all have the same σ. • Even more dramatic increase of the scatter in the gradient–M*relation? – Not easily explained.

  17. Color Gradient • Major merger picture provides a natural explanation for why none of the scaling relations in Fig. 2 shows any feature at log σ / km s-1 > 2.2, and those that are most clearly sensitive to merger histories are almost completely flat. • Feedback picture • Merger is not the only way to produce or alter color gradients • Gradients are related to feedback and winds (pipino et al. 2010). • Interesting challenge: producing the changes in the parameters – M / σ relations.

  18. Because the major dry merger model provides a simple framework for understanding all these relations, the results suggest that M* > 2x1011 M⊙is the scale above which major dry mergers dominate the assembly history. • This particular mass scale also appears in analyses of a local sample (higher quality data, but significantly smaller sample). • Kormendy et al. (2009); Guo & White (2008); Hopkins et al. (2008); Eliche-Moral et al. (2010) • This analysis suggests that above this mass scale, the mergers were not just dry – they were major.

  19. Tension: recent work argues that although mass in the central kpc or so of early-type galaxies has not grown since z~2, the half-light radii have increased by more than a factor of two. • → Inside-out scenario: since z~2, mass has been added to the outer regions only • → Minor mergers? • - Not necessarily! • Tiret et al. (2010): the observation of constant mass in the central regions does not, by itself, exclude major mergers. • Gao et al. (2004): in major dry mergers, the mix of particles in the central regions can change dramatically, even though the total mass in the central regions remains constant.

  20. BCGs (Brightest Cluster Galaxies) • The most massive objects in the local Universe – how they fit into this picture? • Slightly redder than non-BCGs of similar M or L, smaller color gradients (e.g. Roche et al. 2010) → in agreement with the major merger picture • slightly larger sizes (Bernardi 2009) → more size growth than is usually associated with major mergers

  21. BCGs (Brightest Cluster Galaxies) • Two step process? • 1. Major mergers making a BCG erase its color gradient and decrease b/a. • 2. Minor mergers puff up its size. • → in good agreement with a detailed analysis of the age, metallicity and aundance gradients of BCG NGC 4889 (Coccato et al. 2010)

More Related