1 / 15

Factors that Affect Productivity in Wintering Lakes: An Analysis of Lake Zones and Snow Depth

Factors that Affect Productivity in Wintering Lakes: An Analysis of Lake Zones and Snow Depth. Kristen Kernan Winter Ecology- Spring 2012. Relevant Terminology. Productivity- Amount of photosynthesis occurring due to phytoplankton

myrna
Download Presentation

Factors that Affect Productivity in Wintering Lakes: An Analysis of Lake Zones and Snow Depth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Factors that Affect Productivity in Wintering Lakes: An Analysis of Lake Zones and Snow Depth Kristen Kernan Winter Ecology- Spring 2012

  2. Relevant Terminology • Productivity- Amount of photosynthesis occurring due to phytoplankton • Limnetic Zone- Open surface water in a lake, well-lit, and can contain many aquatic organisms • Littoral Zone- near shore area that can maintain aquatic plants • Chlorophyll- a pigment present in phytoplankton used to absorb light for photosynthesis

  3. Why Should I Care? • Phytoplankton remain active during the winter and adjust to changing light conditions (Marchand, 1987) • Lake productivity is related to nutrient content and affects the number of species found in a lake • Light is a limiting factor in wintering lakes and snow coverage can make light penetration more difficult

  4. Background • Evergreen Lake in Evergreen, Colorado • Within the Bear Creak watershed and created by damming Bear Creek in 1927 • Elevation= 2,200.656 meters • Size= .1699 km^2

  5. Bear Creek Watershed

  6. Background (cont.) • Heavily used for recreational purposes: ice skating, ice fishing, resides on the outskirts of a golf course • Completely ice covered • Snow covered on ~90% of the lake except for the area cleared for ice skating

  7. Research Question and Hypotheses • Question: Is the limnetic zone or the littoral zone more productive? • If the limnetic zone is less productive then levels of chlorophyll will be higher in the littoral zone • Question: How is productivity affected by snow coverage? • If productivity is affected by snow coverage then sites with less snow will have higher levels of chlorophyll

  8. Methods: Sample Collection • Samples were collected using a 2-liter Van Dorn and then stored in a cooler to limit light exposure and temperature change • Limnetic • Central Location • Depth= 4.1 meters • Ice Thickness=30 cm • Snow Depth= 35 cm • Samples were taken at 1meter and 3 meter depths • Littoral 1 • Near-shore site • Depth=1.5 meters • Ice thickness= 15 cm • Snow Depth= .5cm • Sample taken at 1 meter depth • Littoral 2 • Depth=1.5 meters • Ice thickness= 25 cm • Snow Depth= 35 cm • Sample taken at 1 meter depth

  9. Methods: Filtration, Extraction, and Analysis of Chlorophyll • Samples were filtered using a glass fiber and stored in a plastic test tube and kept in a freezer until extraction • 10 mL of ethanol was placed in each test tube • Chlorophyll was extracted at 78 degrees Celsius (the boiling point of ethanol) • Post extraction samples were filtered once more and then ran on a spectrophotometer at wavelengths of 665nm and 750nm.

  10. Results: Limnetic Vs. Littoral 6.3 ug/l • Chlorophyll was fairly uniform from Limnetic to Littoral • Increasing lake depth at limnetic site showed a decrease in chlorophyll by .3ug/l 6.2 ug/l 6.0 ug/l Littoral: 1 meter Limnetic: 1 meter Limnetic: 3 meters

  11. Results: Snow Depth Comparison 8.2 ug/l 6.2 ug/l • Higher amounts of chlorophyll at littoral site with half centimeter of snow Littoral 30cm Littoral .05 cm

  12. Discussion • Rejection of hypothesis that littoral zone is more productive than limnetic zone in winter lakes • Chlorophyll at both locations about equal • Acceptance of hypothesis concerning snow depths affect on productivity • More snow coverage=less algae=less photosynthesis • Chlorophyll levels indicate the lake is on the low side of being Mesotrophic (Carlson R.E. and J. Simpson, 1996) • Some evidence suggesting that this may be a characteristic of a wintering lake (French et al., 2007)

  13. Discussion (cont.) • Bear Creek Reservoir in comparison(Clayshulte 2010): • Same watershed • Lower elevation • Eutrophic lake • February of 2010 chlorophyll 14 ug/l • Has experienced algal blooms

  14. Conclusion • Near shore versus open water doesn’t appear to be much of a factor concerning chlorophyll in wintering lakes • Snow depth has a larger impact on productivity due to the availability of light • If given the opportunity to re-do project: • Couple data with hydrolab depth analysis • Pick a known eutrophic lake • Collected more samples

  15. Literature Cited • Carlson R.E. and J. Simpson. “A Coordinator's Guide to Volunteer Lake Monitoring Methods.” North American Lake Management Society. (1996):96 pp. Print. • Clayshulte, Russell. “2010 Annual Report for the Water Quality Control Commission.” Bear Creek Watershed Association (2010): 1-38. Print • French, Todd, and Ellen Petticrew. "Chlorophyll a seasonality in four shallow eutrophic lakes (northern British Columbia, Canada) and the critical roles of internal phosphorus loading and temperature." Hydrobiologia 575 (2007): 285-299. Print. • Marchand, Peter J. Life in the cold: an introduction to winter ecology. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1987. Print.

More Related